____twoism

no, i just like moogs

aha

i was close

yeah, it's a moog, as is the musonics one. might not be the exact same model, but it's the same panel.

iirc, what's used on this track is a slightly off harmony in fifths... which is based on the golden ratio or the fibonacci ratio (which are very close numerically, but not the same thing). in other words, the harmonies within the pad are very slightly out of tune... which adds to the queasy feel ...

iirc, what's used on this track is a slightly off harmony in fifths... which is based on the golden ratio or the fibonacci ratio (which are very close numerically, but not the same thing). in other words, the harmonies within the pad are very slightly out of tune... which adds to the queasy feel ...

or an opinion.

The problem with their first full-length album, Music Has The Right To Children (Warp, 1998), is that it is too obviously inspired by their mentors Autechre.

WTF!!! Those reviews are immoral! :roll:

i can hear little traces of an ae influence in musc has the right, just transplanted to a much ...

Archrival wrote: please please leave this forum for everyones sake.

please, please stop being a fucking dick for everyone's sake.

the focus group

their stuff is very indebted to 70s library music, as is SPB

a sample:
http://www.ghostbox.co.uk/mp3s/thefocusgroup_activityandscales.mp3
i checked this site out and immediatley fell in love...

i am going to order the focus group cd, belbury poly, eric zahn, and the advisory ...

the focus group

their stuff is very indebted to 70s library music, as is SPB

a sample:
http://www.ghostbox.co.uk/mp3s/thefocus ... scales.mp3

the cs80 deserves an article of its own, wikilinked. at the moment my personal concern is to add an infrastructure to the wiki. so i've been making navbars (people, releases, and songs ) and infoboxes and shit.

a song infobox template added and a people navbar added. if anyone can contribute anything to the bios, it's appreciated innit. i can make it nice later; if you have verifiable information, add it!

oh, absolutely anything! the only guideline i would recommend observing is separating speculation into a ==Theories== section, or something.

not my brainchild either, but i just jumped on board(s) - i edit a lot on lostpedia, and a little on wiki.

fredd-e and moebius have done a tremendous amount of work on the wiki section of narfum; i've added a bit tonight, navbars and infoboxes and stuff...

errm i guess this post is a recruitment drive. i'm fairly sure that a lot of posters here have a fairly in-depth knowledge of the releases. have a ...

The only MBV album I have is Loveless. Are the others as good... because that one is classic...

Yes they are as good! Try "Isn't Anything", "Tremolo", "Glider", "You Made Me Realise", "Feed Me With Your Kiss", "Ecstacy and Whine". All great albums.

totally agree. i was very disappointed with ...

i recently found that mbv site as well (via wikipedia iirc)... the two instrumentals which are bonus tracks on loveless are pretty amazing. an awful lot of loveless has a lot in common with, especially, geogaddi, i think,

polar sky wrote: Agreed. They never said once in any interview or in the past that they have ever played at a Red Moon event. I think the code and all that was for the Red Moon only.

uhhh yes they have. a quick google on 'redmoon' will verify there have been events in the past.

boc are gonna lose half their fans, and all is well in the world once miore.

i love it... definitely one of my favourite albums of last year.

but some people have found it patchy, alright.

he made it in buzz