Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:22 pm
christ.
Aesthetics wrote:It's ok, I've read the topic and I see what happened. I don't want to point any finger, it is just that "we" at twoism aren't used to topics/discussions like this.
There usually is a pretty pleasant association here and I think that's what makes Twoism different to other well known messageboards. I guess I can speak for the maturity that we'd like to keep it that way.
oscillik wrote:Aesthetics wrote:It's ok, I've read the topic and I see what happened. I don't want to point any finger, it is just that "we" at twoism aren't used to topics/discussions like this.
There usually is a pretty pleasant association here and I think that's what makes Twoism different to other well known messageboards. I guess I can speak for the maturity that we'd like to keep it that way.
it's ok, i think i'll make a point of not posting in future at all. this has left a rather sour taste. i still have no idea how people could misconstrue my original post as being one trying to hurry the release of an album.
oscillik wrote:Aesthetics wrote:It's ok, I've read the topic and I see what happened. I don't want to point any finger, it is just that "we" at twoism aren't used to topics/discussions like this.
There usually is a pretty pleasant association here and I think that's what makes Twoism different to other well known messageboards. I guess I can speak for the maturity that we'd like to keep it that way.
it's ok, i think i'll make a point of not posting in future at all. this has left a rather sour taste. i still have no idea how people could misconstrue my original post as being one trying to hurry the release of an album.
oscillik wrote:Aesthetics wrote:It's ok, I've read the topic and I see what happened. I don't want to point any finger, it is just that "we" at twoism aren't used to topics/discussions like this.
There usually is a pretty pleasant association here and I think that's what makes Twoism different to other well known messageboards. I guess I can speak for the maturity that we'd like to keep it that way.
it's ok, i think i'll make a point of not posting in future at all. this has left a rather sour taste. i still have no idea how people could misconstrue my original post as being one trying to hurry the release of an album.
Archrival wrote:novayshun wrote:what a load of twaddle. warp is in a much healthier position than ever. it will only cease if they decide to cease.
basically you are just sour because they are not releasing what you want at the times you want.
and at boc's productivity rate they will be contractually tied to warp for infinity+3 years
I completely agree. Warp is just fine (signing more commercial artists then ever) and selling better than ever.
I mean come on !!! (Chk Chk Chk), Grizzly Bear (playing on Letterman and Leno), Maximo Park, Battles etc etc all shit bands except for maybe Grizzly Bear...
Its all bullshit that Warp is going under.
Boards Of Canada will keep releasing albums on their own or Warp no worries, maybe mdg could fill us in.

Yeah but mdg just gives you info that you could guess or assume yourself. What makes him semi-legit is the fact he doesn't spread obnoxious false-hoods. But any information we get from the inside seems to be just as vague as our imaginations in respect to the future of the band.
oscillik wrote:the whole situation with Warp lately (and indeed labels in general) has gotten me thinking...what will happen to the roster of artists currently signed to Warp?
Warp have been making some rather questionable decisions lately, and to me it points to a label that is trying to stay afloat in an industry that is admittedly dying out due to the internet and piracy.
So what will happen to BoC when Warp sinks? because it will happen, and i would be bold enough to say that there won't be any Warp30 celebrations.
i personally see two choices:1. Boards of Canada do the whole "Nine Inch Nails" style self-distribution through the internet thing
or
2. Quit releasing music publicly altogether
since Boards of Canada have openly shown their disdain for the internet in the past, i really don't think they would embrace digital distribution in the same way that Reznor has. ok, the internet presence of Boards of Canada has improved somewhat with the intermittent cryptic clues from our dear mdg, but on the whole i think that BoC would go for option 2, simply because their whole stance on music has been that they make it for their own enjoyment, and for the enjoyment of people close to them. i think they have more integrity than to bow to the pressures of a music industry going under, and i think they would much prefer to sink back into the obscurity whence they came.
discuss?
zeitgeist wrote:christ.
iec wrote:bad vibes, bad vibes. let's all put on our favorite BoC and chill out.
oscillik wrote:
although Merck did just disappear