Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:34 am
A website where people write about music. That's it. I don't see why that makes allot of people bleed out of their ears.Synthetrix wrote:What's pitchfork?
A website where people write about music. That's it. I don't see why that makes allot of people bleed out of their ears.Synthetrix wrote:What's pitchfork?
Agreed. I quite like it actually, bar the odd awful, awful article.Cupz wrote:A website where people write about music. That's it. I don't see why that makes allot of people bleed out of their ears.Synthetrix wrote:What's pitchfork?
..saurus wrote:Agreed. I quite like it actually, bar the odd awful, awful article.Cupz wrote:A website where people write about music. That's it. I don't see why that makes allot of people bleed out of their ears.Synthetrix wrote:What's pitchfork?
Just out of interest, how to people keep up to date with music on the net?

Not far wrong actually. And yeah, I always thought MM was the better of the two.IanRedpoint wrote:http://drownedinsound.com/
http://thequietus.com/
and this place.
I feel nothing, positive or negative, towards Pitchfork. Kinda how I feel about NME.com (I was always a Melody maker reader).
Mexicola wrote:Not far wrong actually. And yeah, I always thought MM was the better of the two.IanRedpoint wrote:http://drownedinsound.com/
http://thequietus.com/
and this place.
I feel nothing, positive or negative, towards Pitchfork. Kinda how I feel about NME.com (I was always a Melody maker reader).
"holly's demo hell" was great, never did once read a review of a tape she actually liked. wonder if she ever got an old BoC tape? Bet she'd regret chucking that out. Saucy minx.Mexicola wrote:Not far wrong actually. And yeah, I always thought MM was the better of the two.IanRedpoint wrote:http://drownedinsound.com/
http://thequietus.com/
and this place.
I feel nothing, positive or negative, towards Pitchfork. Kinda how I feel about NME.com (I was always a Melody maker reader).
Christ! I'd forgotten about that!!23degreesdream wrote:"holly's demo hell" was great, never did once read a review of a tape she actually liked. wonder if she ever got an old BoC tape? Bet she'd regret chucking that out. Saucy minx.
The Telepathic Kid wrote:
Why do people still feel they need to insult people who have different fucking musical tastes to them.
They are not you, you are you, and if you're happy with your musical taste then WHY DO YOU EVEN CARE.

Because if you can impose your your tastes on someone else and they change because of it, that means you are right and they are wrong, this is what is most important.The Telepathic Kid wrote: Why do people still feel they need to insult people who have different fucking musical tastes to them.
They are not you, you are you, and if you're happy with your musical taste then WHY DO YOU EVEN CARE.
If you can be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you can be told what to say or think. Defend your constitutionally protected rights. No one else will do it for you. Thank you.d3v3l wrote:Because if you can impose your your tastes on someone else and they change because of it, that means you are right and they are wrong, this is what is most important.The Telepathic Kid wrote: Why do people still feel they need to insult people who have different fucking musical tastes to them.
They are not you, you are you, and if you're happy with your musical taste then WHY DO YOU EVEN CARE.