Page 8 of 45

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:45 pm
by Iced Cooly Beatnik
The early albums will probably be quite generic and disappointing.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 12:53 am
by Opothecary
Iced Cooly Beatnik wrote:The early albums will probably be quite generic and disappointing.
Ever listen to R35TT? Pretty good spoilers there for those "early albums", if you ask me...

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:37 pm
by Iced Cooly Beatnik
Opothecary wrote:
Iced Cooly Beatnik wrote:The early albums will probably be quite generic and disappointing.
Ever listen to R35TT? Pretty good spoilers there for those "early albums", if you ask me...
R35TT has some real treats, but like I already said, I find a lot of the already released early stuff to be, well, not all that great.

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:21 pm
by Skimming Stone
A Few Old Tunes could well be in the running for my favourite BoC record. The diversity on it is amazing, and I love every single track, bar none.

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 5:19 pm
by Snufkin
lol >_<

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:56 am
by GH
This is more of a confession than an opinion but I need to say it.

Aside from a select few, I'm crap with BoC titles. I know the tracks, and I know the titles, but most of the time I don't know which goes with which.

This is not a problem for me, because I don't ever talk to anybody about BoC (except maybe you guys but then I have time to prepare).

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:49 am
by Negamuse
GH wrote:This is more of a confession than an opinion but I need to say it.

Aside from a select few, I'm crap with BoC titles. I know the tracks, and I know the titles, but most of the time I don't know which goes with which.

This is not a problem for me, because I don't ever talk to anybody about BoC (except maybe you guys but then I have time to prepare).
About half their stuff I'm exactly the same. I could even probably do a half decent cover from memory but I'd struggle with the names of half their tracks.

Cos of er... reasons, I only heard the full MHTRTC like, this year, maybe last year I forget. I was missing two tracks. Mentioned that at the pub before the Twoism meet though and fucked up the track names even then, I had to borrow someone's ipod to cheat :) (Smokes Quantity and Open The Light, by the way).

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:33 pm
by jcnporter
GH wrote:This is more of a confession than an opinion but I need to say it.

Aside from a select few, I'm crap with BoC titles. I know the tracks, and I know the titles, but most of the time I don't know which goes with which.

This is not a problem for me, because I don't ever talk to anybody about BoC (except maybe you guys but then I have time to prepare).
Snap!

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 9:10 am
by green calx
I don't like Aquarius at all
and I listen to BoC even when I don't want to listen to them.

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2014 1:45 am
by Iced Cooly Beatnik
GH wrote:This is more of a confession than an opinion but I need to say it.

Aside from a select few, I'm crap with BoC titles. I know the tracks, and I know the titles, but most of the time I don't know which goes with which.

This is not a problem for me, because I don't ever talk to anybody about BoC (except maybe you guys but then I have time to prepare).
This is the same with me for Campfire, and to some extent, TH. I'm only now getting to know the names of the Campfire Headphase tracks I've loved for ages by making a conscious effort to. To be honest, the music speaks for itself most of the time.

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2014 6:30 am
by re-phaelam-ed
my, now, controversial BoC opinion is that Hi Scores 2014 was re-mastered poorly.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 6:33 am
by Iced Cooly Beatnik
re-phaelam-ed wrote:my, now, controversial BoC opinion is that Hi Scores 2014 was re-mastered poorly.
On the digital release I can't hear too great a difference, but the vinyl edition I have sounds great. How do you think it was poorly done?

Re:

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:40 am
by Jonse
re-phaelam-ed wrote:my, now, controversial BoC opinion is that Hi Scores 2014 was re-mastered poorly.
Somehow, not hearing it at all I feel inclined to believe you, just due to the nature of remasters today. Still, I don't know.

Re:

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 1:59 pm
by Peacock Tail
re-phaelam-ed wrote:my, now, controversial BoC opinion is that Hi Scores 2014 was re-mastered poorly.
I agree with you.

Having grown accustomed to my 1998 CD version, my ears told me that the remaster boosted the bottom end and comparatively made it sound swampy at the expense of some top end definition.

I actually deleted it and reverted back to my CD.

Having said that, if Chinook and Korona were released digitally with the same re-master quality, I'd snap their hand off!

In a few years time, I'm sure record companies will start releasing 'original master' product. Lol! :D

Re: Your controversial BoC opinions.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:27 pm
by fujee
Heard from Telegraph Lines is one of their best tracks, short or long.

Re: Your controversial BoC opinions.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:23 pm
by portiss
I hate Happy Cycling.

Re: Your controversial BoC opinions.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:34 pm
by clearcut
I cant listen to the very first few songs off AFOT because I have an insane fear of PC. Like when I put my phone on shuffle I can't fucking bear it because I might hear PC.

It sucks and I really don't know why

Re: Your controversial BoC opinions.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:36 pm
by Kure
I like Tomorrow's Harvest.

I love The Campfire Headphase.

Re: Your controversial BoC opinions.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:16 pm
by Aerial Boundaries
Kure wrote:I like Tomorrow's Harvest.

I love The Campfire Headphase.
This ain't controversial :)

Re: Your controversial BoC opinions.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:54 pm
by RVeldhuis
portiss wrote:I hate Happy Cycling.
That makes two.
Kure wrote:I like Tomorrow's Harvest.

I love The Campfire Headphase.
TCH has always been my favourite aswell, some people do give it some shit, but there's enough people that like TCH.