Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:29 pm
louise wrote:bad day?
Page 9 of 14
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:48 pm
I like Odd Future, I like The XX, I like Adele, I like a lot of music that's been slagged off here.hexagon son wrote:I don't like this thread because it's about hate. I like U2... my generation, big influence on my life (I'm in my 30's), I like OddFuture because they are refreshing. I like The XX because their music is relevent to my life and relationship. I like Adele because she makes me cry. I like Grimes because _i am Canadian and ___i am __proud of her talent. Fuck all you snobby facetious twats who are subjective about what other people like. Quite frankly, I hate most of you right due to this and one other thread.
How dare you judge music without having some kind of critique! To the person who said they didn't like Autechre, that took a lot of guts. Elaboration on why is good though.
Here, fucking diss this:
do I care? No. Because fuck these motherfuckers, my opinion's what matters.
YOU SHOULD FEEL THE SAME, TOO BRUTHA. :3
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:07 am
http://youtu.be/gH476CxJxfgKamas009 wrote:louise wrote:bad day?
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:22 am
I don't think this thread is about hate. That's certainly not why I started it. In my head it's more a case of seeing artists and even whole genres that are well liked, critically acclaimed and your mates keep telling you to check out, but..... something just doesn't click. For example you can play me a piece of metal and I get the musicianship, I can tell it's well produced..... but something about it says "nah". It's just interesting to think about.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:08 am
It makes me think , is musical "taste" relative to life experiences , or something to do with an event in childhood , or the womb , whereby we are sonically imprinted , and , if the "event" had been a completely different one , would we now be on a death metal board , singing the praises of sepultura ?A_Northern_Soul wrote:I don't think this thread is about hate. That's certainly not why I started it. In my head it's more a case of seeing artists and even whole genres that are well liked, critically acclaimed and your mates keep telling you to check out, but..... something just doesn't click. For example you can play me a piece of metal and I get the musicianship, I can tell it's well produced..... but something about it says "nah". It's just interesting to think about.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:46 am
I got lost at "womb".2ndMOUSE wrote: It makes me think , is musical "taste" relative to life experiences , or something to do with an event in childhood , or the womb , whereby we are sonically imprinted , and , if the "event" had been a completely different one , would we now be on a death metal board , singing the praises of sepultura ?
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:51 am
I'm not sure why this made me laugh like it did. Personally, I like jazz for the rhythms and chord progressions. I really like jazzy chord structures, but not just in jazz. I'm not exactly sure how to explain it, but I enjoy chords with more harmonic notes... To be honest though, I don't really get it either. Jazz, I think, is one of those "strict" genres.GH wrote:
.....Jazz music. *runs away*
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:56 am
I agree with the melodic type thing about jazz.. I can't get enough of it. Though I have to disagree with it being strict- it seems like jazz can be a very loose open ended type genre and it's at the root of a good deal of experimental music/influences. I'd say the pretentious overzealous jazz critics are the strict ones. But I still see what you're sayingbearhead wrote:I'm not sure why this made me laugh like it did. Personally, I like jazz for the rhythms and chord progressions. I really like jazzy chord structures, but not just in jazz. I'm not exactly sure how to explain it, but I enjoy chords with more harmonic notes... To be honest though, I don't really get it either. Jazz, I think, is one of those "strict" genres.GH wrote:
.....Jazz music. *runs away*
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:00 am
Lmaobearhead wrote:I got lost at "womb".2ndMOUSE wrote: It makes me think , is musical "taste" relative to life experiences , or something to do with an event in childhood , or the womb , whereby we are sonically imprinted , and , if the "event" had been a completely different one , would we now be on a death metal board , singing the praises of sepultura ?
Babies still hear stuff in there. I was just thinking what may have imprinted itself on us while we were in the womb
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:05 am
I can diss it by deconstructing the lyrics and criticizing them for being a lame love story song. I'm just trying to illustrate the fact that criticism is possible with anything.hexagon son wrote:I don't like this thread because it's about hate. I like U2... my generation, big influence on my life (I'm in my 30's), I like OddFuture because they are refreshing. I like The XX because their music is relevent to my life and relationship. I like Adele because she makes me cry. I like Grimes because _i am Canadian and ___i am __proud of her talent. Fuck all you snobby facetious twats who are subjective about what other people like. Quite frankly, I hate most of you right due to this and one other thread.
How dare you judge music without having some kind of critique! To the person who said they didn't like Autechre, that took a lot of guts. Elaboration on why is good though.
Here, fucking diss this:
But in general you shouldn't take it so personally when people criticize something you like- everyone has their own opinion. I mean I guess that means you're entitled to being pissed about the criticism but still.. the bigger picture is that one needs to admit vulnerability and flaw and be aware of it because this is part of reality. Not just for music but for everything. So though it might irk you that someone else criticizes something you like, try not to get so emotionally involved. It's not like anyone's trying to attack you directly.
And just to be obnoxious, I hate the XX, Odd Future, Grimes, U2, Adele and whatnot. I don't mean to offend you and my opinion isn't "better" than yours- but it is the truth. You can feel the same way about a lot of music I might cherish. That's part of taste.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:40 am
Yeah, that's more towards what was aiming at. There was a jazz program at my school, and everything was in strict form. It was almost as strict as marching band. Precision was key.TaoTapeTao wrote:I agree with the melodic type thing about jazz.. I can't get enough of it. Though I have to disagree with it being strict- it seems like jazz can be a very loose open ended type genre and it's at the root of a good deal of experimental music/influences. I'd say the pretentious overzealous jazz critics are the strict ones. But I still see what you're saying
I wasn't a part of it, though.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:35 am
Actually... yeah! It was... actually its been a very bad 2 weeks. Sorry for my vent.Kamas009 wrote:louise wrote:bad day?
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:22 am
I like a bit of Jazz, yeah...
Re: the Autechre discussion just for a mo, it's interesting. It's not a black & white, like/dislike to me - especially as the sound and 'feel' has transitioned so greatly.
If anything it comes down to individual tracks...But, to have to simplify it, I'd say I enjoy their earlier music more; the overall mood, melody, and tone. Perhaps even the opposite of whomever mentioned Incunabula has dated - I totally agree on that point itself, it has, but I'm experiencing it as a positive, liking the sound more with age.
If I have to pick the album with an overall consistency of the Autechre sound(s) I like most, I'm tempted to say Tri Repetae.
However, I ought to just drop a mention that Incunabula features, despite its simplicity, one of my favourite tracks ever...
Re: the Autechre discussion just for a mo, it's interesting. It's not a black & white, like/dislike to me - especially as the sound and 'feel' has transitioned so greatly.
If anything it comes down to individual tracks...But, to have to simplify it, I'd say I enjoy their earlier music more; the overall mood, melody, and tone. Perhaps even the opposite of whomever mentioned Incunabula has dated - I totally agree on that point itself, it has, but I'm experiencing it as a positive, liking the sound more with age.
If I have to pick the album with an overall consistency of the Autechre sound(s) I like most, I'm tempted to say Tri Repetae.
However, I ought to just drop a mention that Incunabula features, despite its simplicity, one of my favourite tracks ever...
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:47 pm
The Strokes
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:30 pm
I think Freddie Mercury is the most over-rated rock singer ever. He is so theatrical and doesn't even have a good voice! I don't understand the praise he gets.TaoTapeTao wrote:I love Tool.
I hate Drake.
New Muse SUCKS.
hmmm stuff I think is overrated...
Oddfuture are awful.
um. I don't know.
OH fucking Queen. I hate Queen so much. Even when I'm drunk and a group of friends gets too into them. I just sit there drunk and mad.
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 7:42 pm
I never understood Autechre for the longest time. All I'd heard was Tri Repetae and I thought it was the most boring pretentious music ever. Still do, actually. That said, after listening to Confield I finally realized that I had just picked the wrong album.
Aphex Twin I really, really don't get the hype. A few tracks off of SAWII are amazing, as well as a scattered few individual songs off of his other albums...but I dunno, it's always mostly sounded noodley to me.
Phillip Glass I don't understand.
Also, I saw someone mention crystal castles. They are the most overhyped band in recent memory.
Aphex Twin I really, really don't get the hype. A few tracks off of SAWII are amazing, as well as a scattered few individual songs off of his other albums...but I dunno, it's always mostly sounded noodley to me.
Phillip Glass I don't understand.
Also, I saw someone mention crystal castles. They are the most overhyped band in recent memory.
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 8:01 pm
Me neither. Probably the worst 'best band in the World' ever.fujee wrote:The Strokes
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 8:11 pm
Mumford and Sons for me. Every time.
This video explains why much better than I ever could...
This video explains why much better than I ever could...
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 9:23 pm
Artists that literally make me sick when I hear them.
1. Counting Crows
2. Kiss
3. Elvis Costello
4. Poison
5. Insane Clown Posse
6. Beyonce
7. Taylor Swift
8. Any 90's ska band
9. JON BON JOVI .... I even wrote a little retarded song about him:
Bands that I don't get:
Oasis (blah and whiney)
Muse (I'd rather listen to Radiohead)
The Strokes (How cool are we?)
Action Bronson (Ghostface rip-off)
Almost everything in the mainstream.
The list goes on, but I'll stop there.
1. Counting Crows
2. Kiss
3. Elvis Costello
4. Poison
5. Insane Clown Posse
6. Beyonce
7. Taylor Swift
8. Any 90's ska band
9. JON BON JOVI .... I even wrote a little retarded song about him:
Bands that I don't get:
Oasis (blah and whiney)
Muse (I'd rather listen to Radiohead)
The Strokes (How cool are we?)
Action Bronson (Ghostface rip-off)
Almost everything in the mainstream.
The list goes on, but I'll stop there.
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 9:40 pm
Bob Dylan - yes, yes, I understand why he WAS relevant (once upon a time) but that doesn't make him any good. Dude sounds like the old timers who hang round bus stations arguing with the pigeons. I know every man is supposed to go through a Dylan phase, I've tried and I can't see it ever happening.
Red Hot Chili Peppers - no explanation required.
Red Hot Chili Peppers - no explanation required.