Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2021 7:55 pm
lol
If we take the "multiple records being mastered" theory into account, that'd be the best case scenario really.sandrail wrote:The reason the album is taking longer than usual to release is because they've most definitely been working on the BoCset concurrently with the album which takes much more time than some think. Their catalog of samples and recordings is obviously a unordered mix of tapes, audio files and cds. And if you ask why they don't just release the cd remasters they made in 1997 of their old stuff, those cd remasters were most likely not that great, and won't make the cut in terms of quality. They will most likely have to remake some entire songs because of the terrible audio quality they were either recorded at or stored at, while at the same time making a whole album. Give them a break guys, they're working really hard.
That's just like your opinion manMagrathea wrote:I, for one, would be absolutely gutted if it was a bocset. Seriously, old stuff that was subpar to anything and everything they have done since, by a loooong shot? I would feel like it would have been a humongous waste of time and curation. A bocset is good for when you retire and the editor/publisher goes through your vault and reheat the leftovers.
All this time waiting, for that?
I don't need no stinkin' bocset.
Wow, stinkin' bocset?Magrathea wrote:I, for one, would be absolutely gutted if it was a bocset. Seriously, old stuff that was subpar to anything and everything they have done since, by a loooong shot? I would feel like it would have been a humongous waste of time and curation. A bocset is good for when you retire and the editor/publisher goes through your vault and reheat the leftovers.
All this time waiting, for that?
I don't need no stinkin' bocset.
I think that in terms of material to be uncovered we already know that the early takes of BoC music are perceived by the band as private and probably shall stay that way, if we were offered the proposed bocset, it would most likely contain outtakes and revised old tunes.Magrathea wrote:I, for one, would be absolutely gutted if it was a bocset. Seriously, old stuff that was subpar to anything and everything they have done since, by a loooong shot? I would feel like it would have been a humongous waste of time and curation. A bocset is good for when you retire and the editor/publisher goes through your vault and reheat the leftovers.
All this time waiting, for that?
I don't need no stinkin' bocset.
He deserves to be paid 3 quid a year for dealing with people putting words in Mike & Marcus' mouths.NorthSaturnian wrote:i just realized that that means mdg has to pay 3 quid per year, just to tell people to shut up about fake tunesbakedsodium wrote:and fuck his paywalled forum.
poor bastard lol
This is speculation based off my experience remastering audio. My dad had a garage band in the 80s, everything was stored on cassettes and I was remastering them at one point. Had to go through all these hurdles to get decently sounding audio.Davism wrote:sandrail wrote:The reason the album is taking longer than usual to release is because they've most definitely been working on the BoCset concurrently with the album which takes much more time than some think. Their catalog of samples and recordings is obviously a unordered mix of tapes, audio files and cds. And if you ask why they don't just release the cd remasters they made in 1997 of their old stuff, those cd remasters were most likely not that great, and won't make the cut in terms of quality. They will most likely have to remake some entire songs because of the terrible audio quality they were either recorded at or stored at, while at the same time making a whole album. Give them a break guys, they're working really hard.
You speak....... as if you know........ for sure.....................that this is the case.
you missed the pun entirelydemo wrote:Wow, stinkin' bocset?Magrathea wrote:
I don't need no stinkin' bocset.
I didn't know it stunk, In that case I'm guessing you've already heard it, feel free to DM me the leaked BoCset so I can hear how stinky this thing really is.
Well, as a musician I know that my audience has expectations, and as the time rolls, they expect me to bend some to give them what they need, any band that has been even remotely pupular is like this... you have to play the classics, that you like it or not has no importance, you are a provider of a service, in this case, art, and you can either tell your audience to just take it, or you can deliver.NTFMTS wrote:That's just like your opinion manMagrathea wrote:I, for one, would be absolutely gutted if it was a bocset. Seriously, old stuff that was subpar to anything and everything they have done since, by a loooong shot? I would feel like it would have been a humongous waste of time and curation. A bocset is good for when you retire and the editor/publisher goes through your vault and reheat the leftovers.
All this time waiting, for that?
I don't need no stinkin' bocset.
I keep reiterating this as the chat moves forward but.. As a listener, the audience is owed nothing.
I welcome opinions on them as an artist, but am irritated when people project expectations on them. As musicians, they've made themselves be in a position where they don't need to consistently tour and placate people over their art. That's the best place to be in creatively and I'm lucky enough that they opt in to give something back to their listeners.
Again, there is nothing owed. This reminds me of fans shouting at the Beatles or Pink Floyd or whomever in a greater extending catalogue thru time to release content always. It's un-reality, and it seems like an unhealthy para-social place to be with musicians with whom you love their work.
My final point being, I respect your opinion, but don't think expectations matter
As another fellow musician who has toured quite a bit and did the constant grind to build up influence and interest, I can relate 100%. It's difficult to strike a balance, even just to make enough money to finish a tour. It's definitely a bleak position for establishing artists and even semi - bigger bands (in the US at least), It is an unfortunate time for newer musicians who are not on a label, but also that means there's all sorts of neat stuff scattered and hidden on the internet and in the world to be surprised by.Magrathea wrote:Well, as a musician I know that my audience has expectations, and as the time rolls, they expect me to bend some to give them what they need, any band that has been even remotely pupular is like this... you have to play the classics, that you like it or not has no importance, you are a provider of a service, in this case, art, and you can either tell your audience to just take it, or you can deliver.
So, artistically, they can do as they want, as a provider of goods, the public has expectations. I know it's cold and harsh, but that's the way this has devolved into and I agree, it sucks.
Point is, New >> Rehashed in my opinion, I mean, how many versions of Rock and Roll all night does the world need?
Honestly, they could probably post a thirty second clip, and all BOC related places, even WATMM would probably be ecstatic. Cats and dogs living together peacefully, a plague of frogs raining from the sky etcbocbocbocboc wrote:I don't care if it's new or old BOC. I'd just be happy they're back.
Just listening to the full version of Duffy would bring a tear to my eye.
Full studio version of Spiro plzihmeauto wrote:I would assume the bocset would include studio versions of the unreleased live stuff they played back in the day. That would be enough for me to get excited, not to mention outtakes from 1995- 2013.
Second this, why it wasn’t on geogaddi I don’t know!SamuraiDrifter wrote:Full studio version of Spiro plzihmeauto wrote:I would assume the bocset would include studio versions of the unreleased live stuff they played back in the day. That would be enough for me to get excited, not to mention outtakes from 1995- 2013.