Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:20 am
by turquoise70
oscillik wrote:turquoise70 wrote:IN POST APOCALYPTIC FUTURE NEW YORK, 3 GANGS CONVERGE TO MAKE THE ULTIMATE WAR:
THE VINYLS
THE TAPES
THE MP3S
WHO WILL WIN? WHO CARES WHAT A BUNCH OF DORKS
come out to plaaaaaaayyyyyaaaayyyyyyyyy

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:52 am
by oscillik
the letter p wrote:Why I never really enjoyed this thread:
That's so funny that you dislike the cassette version (though you've probably only ever heard the mp3 version of Old Tunes, but for the sake of this argument lets just talk about cassettes in general) yet you settle for the compressed sound of an mp3.
Give me vinyl and tapes. Though inconvenient, personally, I love them. I've ripped them to 320kbps though

But then again, I grew up with them. So I have a place for them. If you didn't, I can understand what you're saying.
damn, we're old?
:-/ why'd no-one tell me sooner?!
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:22 pm
by Dragon
hGc wrote:I gave the Audiotracks titles according to their number: six, nine, twenty-three, etc...
Maybe we need to hold a contest for who can come up with the best track titles!
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4044
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:46 pm
by polar sky
There is nothing worse than over produced clear as a bell recording. I agree that the whole hissing on tape is part of the whole nostalgia, and I love it. It defines that time for them.
Re: Why I never really enjoyed OTV1 (35 Random Tracks)
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:47 pm
by polar sky
Tekmosis wrote:I want to see if anyone can relate with me on the two points I'm about to make about why OTV1 (now known as 35 random tracks) never really did it for me.
1. Obvious first reason. The cassette hissing in the backround is atrocious. Bad sound quality can ruin a whole track for me, especially with Boards of Canada and other electronic music where every little sound means something. For this reason I am usually motivated to spend $0.99 cents on a song from itunes rather than rip it from youtube for free and have the quality be reduced. And also why listening to BoC on headphones rather than speaker is also more enjoyable. Not only the hissing on 35 random tracks, but the sound quality is just awful, all you on here have heard it ...
2. No song titles. This always really bugged me and put a big hole in the entire listening experience. ot only is BoC my favorite band for the unparalelled music they produce, but I always fund myself enjoy a track that much more if the track title was innovative, creative, and original. It got me thinking and set a tone for the track. I'm not sure if I'm explaining this right. I'll break it down like this, what would you rather listen to without knowing what the sngs sounded like: Audiotrack 11 or Infinite Lines of Colorful Sevens? See what I mean?
anyway, my rant is over. can anyone see what I mean by my second reason?
Who cares if it has no name, if MHTRTC had no track names, would you dislike it?
Re: Why I never really enjoyed OTV1 (35 Random Tracks)
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:33 pm
by Tekmosis
polar sky wrote:Tekmosis wrote:I want to see if anyone can relate with me on the two points I'm about to make about why OTV1 (now known as 35 random tracks) never really did it for me.
1. Obvious first reason. The cassette hissing in the backround is atrocious. Bad sound quality can ruin a whole track for me, especially with Boards of Canada and other electronic music where every little sound means something. For this reason I am usually motivated to spend $0.99 cents on a song from itunes rather than rip it from youtube for free and have the quality be reduced. And also why listening to BoC on headphones rather than speaker is also more enjoyable. Not only the hissing on 35 random tracks, but the sound quality is just awful, all you on here have heard it ...
2. No song titles. This always really bugged me and put a big hole in the entire listening experience. ot only is BoC my favorite band for the unparalelled music they produce, but I always fund myself enjoy a track that much more if the track title was innovative, creative, and original. It got me thinking and set a tone for the track. I'm not sure if I'm explaining this right. I'll break it down like this, what would you rather listen to without knowing what the sngs sounded like: Audiotrack 11 or Infinite Lines of Colorful Sevens? See what I mean?
anyway, my rant is over. can anyone see what I mean by my second reason?
Who cares if it has no name, if MHTRTC had no track names, would you dislike it?
I would still enjoy it, but I wouldn't appreciate it as much.
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:52 pm
by the letter p
"C'est fini la comédie"
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:18 pm
by Tekmosis
the letter p wrote:Tek,
I guess you you don't like Pete Standing Alone or Telephasic Workshop then.
There is all kinds of line-noise or tape hiss in those tracks.
I find it adds breath and space to the track. There is also a noise filter on one of the pads.
Check the first 2 mintues of Telephasic.
I don't think you understand. I love the two tracks you mentioned. I don't know how to explain that it is different hissing, unintended, and poor quality.
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:23 pm
by dave_from_2001
they get dramatic
say they gotta have it
but I get enough static from
the old records in the attic
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:50 am
by the letter p
"C'est fini la comédie"