Page 2 of 3

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:51 am
by 747Music
Stry Craty Bya wrote:I really don't care. I just love listening to Boards of Canada. More than any other music, as a matter of fact. So if they say that they're releasing new music; Yes, I'm going to get excited.
This.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:51 am
by Mexicola
^^^ Word.

Hipsters-schmipsters.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:25 pm
by nightGoat
people who label other people hipsters and such are pretentious, nah mean?

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:24 pm
by turquoise70
normally i used the word "hipster" in extremely lighthearted, loose meaning. partially because i've never gotten a straight answer on just /exactly/ what is and is NOT a hipster. everyone has something different to say about it.

for instance, i often say i dress like a hipster or have hipster hair. but i probably don't.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:00 pm
by hexagon son
wow, this thread was dug from the depths... i haven't seen a thread with Chyld in it for god know how long!

Used to be BoC "geek"... now i just like the style. I've been Freescha crazy the past month or so.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:19 pm
by 747Music
hexagon son wrote:I've been Freescha crazy the past month or so.
A fine choice of crazy I must say. Kids Fill The Floor is a brilliant album.

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:58 am
by Twoism-ist
i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:49 am
by turquoise70
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
way, way, way more.

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:56 am
by GrangalanJr
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
:lol:

Yes.

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:22 pm
by sevenELIXIR
granglan (sorry if the spelling is wrong) I have to ask.... is your avatar either terrance or philip??

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 4:31 am
by GrangalanJr
Nah. My avatar is one of the enemy creatures in the game Final Fantasy VII. The creature's name is "Grangalan Jr," naturally.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:20 am
by kidfortoday70
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Hell yes it does.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:17 pm
by 747Music
GrangalanJr wrote:Nah. My avatar is one of the enemy creatures in the game Final Fantasy VII. The creature's name is "Grangalan Jr," naturally.
I KNEW IT! I knew I saw that somewhere, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. FFVII is my favorite game of all time. That's awesome.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:20 pm
by PadraïK
sevenELIXIR wrote:granglan (sorry if the spelling is wrong) I have to ask.... is your avatar either terrance or philip??
:D thought the same thing

I had to google 'hipster' to find out in wikipedia that besides a sexy cut of female-underwear it is what we around here used to call 'artyfarty'. Artyfarty however refers to being 'difficult' for the sake of being 'difficult'. One related side-topic is the overflow of digital possibilities making it impossible to decide which possibilities are necessary in a creative process where one results in stacking plugins and tracks just because it's possible, or using video-edits just because the technique permits. Art and demonstration where mistaken in times. I think by now that era is history.

BOC his not at all 'artyfarty' imo

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:51 am
by IanRedpoint
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:59 am
by The Friendly Stranger
IanRedpoint wrote:
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Exactly.

So what music does this guy listen to then Twoism-ist?

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:34 pm
by turquoise70
The Friendly Stranger wrote:
IanRedpoint wrote:
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Exactly.

So what music does this guy listen to then Twoism-ist?
you haven't heard of them 8)

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:32 pm
by Waterbagel
how many hipsters does it take to screw in a lightbulb?



it's an obscure number, you've never heard of it

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:17 pm
by Pantheon
Waterbagel wrote:how many hipsters does it take to screw in a lightbulb?



it's an obscure number, you've never heard of it
Hahah, fuckin A!

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:57 pm
by The Friendly Stranger
turquoise70 wrote:
The Friendly Stranger wrote:
IanRedpoint wrote: Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Exactly.

So what music does this guy listen to then Twoism-ist?
you haven't heard of them 8)
Ha of course! I was thinking I wasn't mainstream for a moment, how stupid am I....