Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:16 pm
Have to add: total <3
Agree. Very over rated IMO. Hipster flavour of the month.subset wrote:First off, a disclaimer: I'm definitely not trolling and not looking for an argument.
I'm just genuinely confused...
I listened to several tracks by Grimes, desperately trying to find any sort of positive quality to her music that I could hold on to, and found none.
Music, arrangement, vocals, lyrics... they all sounds very void, flat, and unimaginative to me. Her vocal skills are superb, that much is clear, but this alone is not enough.
In the very unlikely hypothetical situation of someone asking me "Would the guys over at Twoism enjoy this?", I would've gone "Hell no!!!" with the utmost conviction I'm capable of.
What's the appeal of her music for you?
P.S. Not sure why I get so wound up sometimes when I dislike certain artists that seem to be hugely popular with people who otherwise mostly share my taste and sensibilities about music. Same with Actress, Grouper, Portishead's last album... I guess I just don't want to miss something because I've not found the correct way to approach and explore it.
I disagree completely. She does everything herself. Composes the music. Writes the lyrics. Can perform live playing and singing at the same time. Great image. She, in my mind, is more like what pop music should be like. I can't put my finger on what specific qualities I like about her music, it just appeals to me and I really enjoyed the Japanese release of her latest album "Visions", with it's bonus tracks. Halifaxa is also a great album. I just like good music. It doesn't have to be particularily groudbreaking for it to sit well with me. Good on 4AD for picking her up.Tony Montana wrote:Agree. Very over rated IMO. Hipster flavour of the month.subset wrote:First off, a disclaimer: I'm definitely not trolling and not looking for an argument.
I'm just genuinely confused...
I listened to several tracks by Grimes, desperately trying to find any sort of positive quality to her music that I could hold on to, and found none.
Music, arrangement, vocals, lyrics... they all sounds very void, flat, and unimaginative to me. Her vocal skills are superb, that much is clear, but this alone is not enough.
In the very unlikely hypothetical situation of someone asking me "Would the guys over at Twoism enjoy this?", I would've gone "Hell no!!!" with the utmost conviction I'm capable of.
What's the appeal of her music for you?
P.S. Not sure why I get so wound up sometimes when I dislike certain artists that seem to be hugely popular with people who otherwise mostly share my taste and sensibilities about music. Same with Actress, Grouper, Portishead's last album... I guess I just don't want to miss something because I've not found the correct way to approach and explore it.
I get the image and the visual artist stuff. I think that's cool. But the music just doesn't get me excited. It's well produced and there's an interesting vibe. However I think it's her vocal that bugs me the most. She sounds too child-like and whiny. An annoying voice nearly always ruins my ability to enjoy some types of pop music.hexagon son wrote:I disagree completely. She does everything herself. Composes the music. Writes the lyrics. Can perform live playing and singing at the same time. Great image. She, in my mind, is more like what pop music should be like. I can't put my finger on what specific qualities I like about her music, it just appeals to me and I really enjoyed the Japanese release of her latest album "Visions", with it's bonus tracks. Halifaxa is also a great album. I just like good music. It doesn't have to be particularily groudbreaking for it to sit well with me. Good on 4AD for picking her up.Tony Montana wrote:Agree. Very over rated IMO. Hipster flavour of the month.subset wrote:First off, a disclaimer: I'm definitely not trolling and not looking for an argument.
I'm just genuinely confused...
I listened to several tracks by Grimes, desperately trying to find any sort of positive quality to her music that I could hold on to, and found none.
Music, arrangement, vocals, lyrics... they all sounds very void, flat, and unimaginative to me. Her vocal skills are superb, that much is clear, but this alone is not enough.
In the very unlikely hypothetical situation of someone asking me "Would the guys over at Twoism enjoy this?", I would've gone "Hell no!!!" with the utmost conviction I'm capable of.
What's the appeal of her music for you?
P.S. Not sure why I get so wound up sometimes when I dislike certain artists that seem to be hugely popular with people who otherwise mostly share my taste and sensibilities about music. Same with Actress, Grouper, Portishead's last album... I guess I just don't want to miss something because I've not found the correct way to approach and explore it.
Not flavour of the month, BTW, she has been around for a while now... say 3 albums worth of stuff at least!
This, pretty much. She always brings to mind what chart music could sound like if people put more effort into finding music -- accessible, yet creative and interesting.hexagon son wrote:I disagree completely. She does everything herself. Composes the music. Writes the lyrics. Can perform live playing and singing at the same time. Great image. She, in my mind, is more like what pop music should be like. I can't put my finger on what specific qualities I like about her music, it just appeals to me and I really enjoyed the Japanese release of her latest album "Visions", with it's bonus tracks. Halifaxa is also a great album. I just like good music. It doesn't have to be particularily groudbreaking for it to sit well with me. Good on 4AD for picking her up.Tony Montana wrote:Agree. Very over rated IMO. Hipster flavour of the month.subset wrote:First off, a disclaimer: I'm definitely not trolling and not looking for an argument.
I'm just genuinely confused...
I listened to several tracks by Grimes, desperately trying to find any sort of positive quality to her music that I could hold on to, and found none.
Music, arrangement, vocals, lyrics... they all sounds very void, flat, and unimaginative to me. Her vocal skills are superb, that much is clear, but this alone is not enough.
In the very unlikely hypothetical situation of someone asking me "Would the guys over at Twoism enjoy this?", I would've gone "Hell no!!!" with the utmost conviction I'm capable of.
What's the appeal of her music for you?
P.S. Not sure why I get so wound up sometimes when I dislike certain artists that seem to be hugely popular with people who otherwise mostly share my taste and sensibilities about music. Same with Actress, Grouper, Portishead's last album... I guess I just don't want to miss something because I've not found the correct way to approach and explore it.
Not flavour of the month, BTW, she has been around for a while now... say 3 albums worth of stuff at least!
What track did you listen to? How long did you listen for. How much time did it take youCupz wrote:I agree with the people who are confused. This is confusing. This is lady gaga kicked in the balls on reverb.
...but thats just my opinion. Don't kill me aaaagh!
Every time I choose to pour some time into her it only takes a couple of seconds before I end up with the same song (Genesis apparently), I've seen two different videos for this track, so I got the feeling this was the song describing her sound the most. I get the appeal, I just dont think "banging on the black keys of a keyboard" is very interesting (it was something I did when I was 8 saying "look, it sounds Chinese!"). The first video was just her being taped playing and singing, so that gave me some time to hear the music. Uninteresting. Inspired, but uninteresting.hexagon son wrote:What track did you listen to? How long did you listen for. How much time did it take youCupz wrote:I agree with the people who are confused. This is confusing. This is lady gaga kicked in the balls on reverb.
...but thats just my opinion. Don't kill me aaaagh!
To decide she sounds like Lady Gaga "kicked in the balls" as you say?
(Sorry for the strange layout of the post. I am posting from my iPhone because I poured lots of alcohol
In my MacBook 2 weeks ago. It doesn't seem to work anymore. )
Ok, this is better. Genesis is nothing like any of the other tracks on the album and certainly doesCupz wrote:Every time I choose to pour some time into her it only takes a couple of seconds before I end up with the same song (Genesis apparently), I've seen two different videos for this track, so I got the feeling this was the song describing her sound the most. I get the appeal, I just dont think "banging on the black keys of a keyboard" is very interesting (it was something I did when I was 8 saying "look, it sounds Chinese!"). The first video was just her being taped playing and singing, so that gave me some time to hear the music. Uninteresting. Inspired, but uninteresting.hexagon son wrote:What track did you listen to? How long did you listen for. How much time did it take youCupz wrote:I agree with the people who are confused. This is confusing. This is lady gaga kicked in the balls on reverb.
...but thats just my opinion. Don't kill me aaaagh!
To decide she sounds like Lady Gaga "kicked in the balls" as you say?
(Sorry for the strange layout of the post. I am posting from my iPhone because I poured lots of alcohol
In my MacBook 2 weeks ago. It doesn't seem to work anymore. )
The second time (right before I posted my op), same song, different video with these stupid "ooh look how strange I am" costumes (thats the lady gaga part). Every artist making a buck nowadays is trying to be strange...even artists I like. Its getting old. I get the love for fashion but this is getting old.
Ok, so I haven't exactly delved into the realm that is grimes, but sorry, if you make a video with an obvious budget, I take that as a business-card. This is a crappy business-card, I am not interested.
Also, pouring alcohol is not a requirement for making a macbook run. That's what charcoal is for!
louise wrote:I agree with the disagreers on this one. I've tried, it's all too jangley and whiny for me.