Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:42 pm
Only 2 first photos in 7 posts earlier, but chalangers used others photos, or not?Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
In anyway you can kill me if i am a real bastard
Only 2 first photos in 7 posts earlier, but chalangers used others photos, or not?Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
I used my own photography, got the negatives to back it upPatryk Ludamage wrote:but chalangers used others photos, or not?Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phonepolar sky wrote:I used my own photography, got the negatives to back it upPatryk Ludamage wrote:but chalangers used others photos, or not?Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.Patryk Ludamage wrote: Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
Ok - i'll maybe try itNeels wrote:I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.Patryk Ludamage wrote: Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera using 110 film. And a Dollar Store Camera with 35 mm expired film. The grain comes from the dust and the hairs that is in the housing of the camera that get trapped on the film, the light leaks are from it being a plastic camera.Neels wrote:I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.Patryk Ludamage wrote: Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone

Looks great tho man, realy awesome.polar sky wrote:I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera. And A Dollar Store Camera with expired film.Neels wrote:I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.Patryk Ludamage wrote: Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
You don't have to have a fisher price one either, 110 film looks nostalgic in any old 110 film camera.Pantheon wrote:Looks great tho man, realy awesome.polar sky wrote:I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera. And A Dollar Store Camera with expired film.Neels wrote: I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.

No one is angry with you Patryk. There's no harm in submitting your ideas. We are just giving feedback!Patryk Ludamage wrote:Ok - i'll maybe try itNeels wrote:I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.Patryk Ludamage wrote: Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone![]()
I think that my works is usless and mr. Fredd-E have enough for a collection. I'll not make everyone angry with me anymore. sorry for my flood and i hope some useless posts will delete![]()
P.S. - it is my last post in this thread, sorry for long conversation



Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Ray wrote:Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
That's still an awesome first post matey! Nice workRay wrote:Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Really? Well i hope so )Joebot Kill wrote:No one is angry with you Patryk. There's no harm in submitting your ideas. We are just giving feedback!Patryk Ludamage wrote:Ok - i'll maybe try itNeels wrote: I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.![]()
I think that my works is usless and mr. Fredd-E have enough for a collection. I'll not make everyone angry with me anymore. sorry for my flood and i hope some useless posts will delete![]()
P.S. - it is my last post in this thread, sorry for long conversation
Yes. My suggestion (or better restriction) is you use the photoshop .psd file to create the banner. When you open the file with Photoshop you see a couple of layers. The logo layer should remain untouched/locked. You can use any of the other layers to put in your background photo work. That way the logo will remain crystal clear and sharp. When you save your work you could save it to PSD and send me that file by means of something like http://drop.io/. Just send me a private message or email with a link to the file. If you don't save it as PSD but something like jpeg, make sure you save it with NO compression. Maximum quality possible else the logo will be scrambled again and then I won't post it. I'm really picky about these kind of things.Patryk Ludamage wrote: In anyway - i just want to create for a collection one or five good banners with my previous photos.
If i'll use those logo in pds, my works will accept or in anyway i must to do something new with my own photos to get into collection?
for some reason the first one makes me think of Amo Bishop Roden and the second one makes me think of CorsairRay wrote:
and another