Page 132 of 1180
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 5:33 pm
by Magrathea
Archrival wrote:What is this? 572 572 50 50 5 1 fade 8 8 2 left ...
It is part of the XML code for the BOC discography on their webpage:
Code: Select all
<imgWidth>572</imgWidth><imgHeight>572</imgHeight><thumbWidth>50</thumbWidth><thumbHeight>50</thumbHeight><thumbSpace>5</thumbSpace><backgroundAlpha>1</backgroundAlpha><transitionType>fade</transitionType><imgCorner>8</imgCorner><thumbCorner>8</thumbCorner><thumbnailRows>2</thumbnailRows><thumbPosition>left</thumbPosition>
And the last image, for the black box is labeled as: boc7t_ whereas the title would go after the underscore. The image is in PNG format, I wonder if there's a way to hide steganographic info into a transparent png... hmmm....
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:23 pm
by Magrathea
hm I don't think there's lots that can be hidden in that image anyways, it's small and the analysis I run over it came out empty...
I guess I'm desperate to find things where there aren't any LOL
Back to work...
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:27 pm
by pointlessdude
Excuse me kind people, are there any BoC news by chance?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:38 pm
by drixlin
portiss wrote:Kamas009 wrote:zeitgeist wrote:
i have an idea!
let's give them an ultimatum!
Hopefully you don't think that will work.
He was being sarcastic!
If there isn't any info by October, I'm not saying I'd lose interest in an album, I just won't be paying as much attention/getting my hopes up. At this point there has been little bits and pieces piquing my interest, but if nothing happens by Boctober, then I'll just pull myself back and go back about my business.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:33 pm
by nick47
What keeps me coming back is the fear of missing an announcement or something
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:57 pm
by LeoHmr
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/au ... ndon-riots
Wouldnt it be ironic if Boards of Canadas new record was stored in Warps storage and got burned up. That would possibly mean a greater delay. Damn british riots!
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:24 pm
by drixlin
nick47 wrote:What keeps me coming back is the fear of missing an announcement or something
This.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:34 pm
by polar sky
nick47 wrote:What keeps me coming back is the fear of missing an announcement or something
Me too, although I'm pretty sure I would find out through Warp's E-mails anyways. I find myself bored with all the speculations.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 1:59 am
by Lens Larque
polar sky wrote:nick47 wrote:What keeps me coming back is the fear of missing an announcement or something
Me too, although I'm pretty sure I would find out through Warp's E-mails anyways. I find myself bored with all the speculations.
All the new BoC albums were burnt or melted in the PIAS warehouse.
Irony: the new record was called Riot Diet For Ferrets
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:20 am
by dp
That thought crossed my mind. Let's hope not. I am curious if this might affect the Plaid release.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:52 pm
by Kinski
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:21 pm
by nick47
^^^ Hahahahahahahaha
That made my day!
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:32 pm
by Twoist
Just seen via my BoC Google Alert;
LabelLove - Fundraiser page for PIAS victim labels.
http://cognitvedissonancerecords.com/labellove/
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:27 pm
by ArbitersGround
Good track, but still total bullshit, nonetheless.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:33 pm
by Echo the Sun
Kamas009 wrote:zeitgeist wrote:drixlin wrote:
Yup.
Album doesn't have to be out in October...just some OFFICIAL news by then would be nice...
i have an idea!
let's give them an ultimatum!
Hopefully you don't think that will work.
BoC, if you don't give us an album right now, I'm going to go listen to Justin Bieber. I swear I'll do it!
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:33 pm
by ryetronics
ArbitersGround wrote:
Good track, but still total bullshit, nonetheless.
Funny. I love how the "new" BoC sounds like it's from 20 years ago! Weak attempt.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:46 pm
by jjjamz365
it'd be a nice xmas present
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:33 pm
by dp
ArbitersGround wrote:
Good track, but still total bullshit, nonetheless.
That was just awful.
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:31 pm
by polar sky
dp wrote:ArbitersGround wrote:
Good track, but still total bullshit, nonetheless.
That was just awful.
I don't get it. Why go through the trouble of making a fake track? If you spent all that time on it, why not release it as your own? Lame.
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:10 pm
by nick47
