Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:47 am
pre launch review
http://www.uncut.co.uk/blog/wild-mercur ... rst-listen
Page 3 of 7
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:59 am
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:08 am
Other Norwegian reviews in:
«Dagbladet», 4 out of 6.
http://translate.google.no/translate?sl ... 2F&act=url
«Verdens Gang», 5 out of 6.
http://translate.google.no/translate?sl ... 67&act=url
«Dagsavisen», 5 out of 6.
http://translate.google.no/translate?hl ... sruiner%2F
New pic btw?
«Dagbladet», 4 out of 6.
http://translate.google.no/translate?sl ... 2F&act=url
«Verdens Gang», 5 out of 6.
http://translate.google.no/translate?sl ... 67&act=url
«Dagsavisen», 5 out of 6.
http://translate.google.no/translate?hl ... sruiner%2F
New pic btw?
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:27 am
yeah...seems to be a recent one! 
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:35 pm
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:40 pm
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 3:04 pm
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 3:09 pm
The Pitchfork review is largely un-Pitchforky by actually discussing the content of the music. Not bad, if we're playing their numbers game I'd put in the low to mid 9s, but it got a better review than I thought it would.
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:20 pm
The Fly, free UK music monthly. Also using the same image as above. Hi-Res scan below.
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:22 pm
Thats a cool press photo.
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:10 pm
Could not have put it better myself. What a dipshit for making a generalised statement like that. TCH is my FAVORITE album... (personal pref).vballs wrote:A nice positive review. BUT; the "2005`s disappointing Campfire Headphase"? Says who? What a Jackass, he could have at least stated that it was his personal opinion and not a generic straight up fact.Aimo wrote:The Guardian review - and a new pic!!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/ju ... est-review
I hate music journalists, bunch of music snobs who try to dictate what is good and what is not, people don't need to listen to these monkeys. Just make your own mind up and think for yourself.
As for that NME one above. FFS!!
/small rant, feeling better
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:25 pm
Best damn review I've read so far...plasselb wrote:p4k 8.3 BNM http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/181 ... s-harvest/
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:34 pm
I don't know if it's riding hype right now or what, but I think this is the best alb8n they have ever made (that I've heard).
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:45 pm
This, yes.d3v3l wrote:Best damn review I've read so far...plasselb wrote:p4k 8.3 BNM http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/181 ... s-harvest/
This review is incredibly well written. Good job Pitchfork.
Although, to be nit-picky, 8.3 is pretty low on their chart for BNM. I've always found that Pitchfork tends to be... a little more generous with BNM ratings if they tend to "like" the band. I wonder if the reviewer wasn't originally going to give TH a BNM and then it was added afterwards by the reviews editor.
Hrm...
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:34 pm
as an open pitchfork hater i have to admit that was a pretty well written review. the author avoided a lot of the writing that makes a terrible music review. mentioning M.C Escher was nice.
although i think saying "there isn't music trickiness to the percussion" is inaccurate.
i realized all the good reviews i've read, such as mbv, were written by this same guy who has been there since '98. the editor-in-chief.
although i think saying "there isn't music trickiness to the percussion" is inaccurate.
i realized all the good reviews i've read, such as mbv, were written by this same guy who has been there since '98. the editor-in-chief.
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:56 pm
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:08 pm
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:49 pm
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:29 pm
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:34 pm