____twoism

Well on that at least the 0:59 run length is consistent with how long Remmy Kid's supposed to be. I just think it's odd that a 0:59 long track would sound like the middle third of a wierd videogame sounding thing and not, say, a standalone vignette or something.

Sorry, I meant if you had the whole album in your hand then why post just part of it, especially if the tracks are on top of each other OT/R35TT-style? I'd think the temptation to post it all would be too great, or they'd have something in the description about why they had only one track. And agreed, if it's real it's one hell of an outlier.

If the dude actually has the full album, I don't see why he couldn't have just posted Wouldn't You Like To Be Free seeing as we already have a portion of the track. It'd be a pretty weird situation to have Remmy Kid but not the rest of the album as well

Oh well...it was fun while it lasted:



http://evacom.bandcamp.com/track/data-east

cfish wrote:Oh well...it was fun while it lasted:



http://evacom.bandcamp.com/track/data-east

Nice, at least we got to know the original artist

TheStatPow wrote:

cfish wrote:Oh well...it was fun while it lasted:



http://evacom.bandcamp.com/track/data-east

Nice, at least we got to know the original artist

And from what I listened, it's a pretty good record the dude lifted the track from.

I bet Tom's pleased with all this publicity

So the start of the next track that was 'accidentally' left on remains a mystery...
Remember that other fake track from Play By Numbers that came with a high quality scan of (what appeared to be) the actual artwork? It's almost as if someone has the real deal but is teasing the fans by giving us fake tracks instead...

"Here, have an obviously fake track along with a very high res photo of the REAL artwork that no one's ever seen before in such quality!"
"Listen to the first track of this unreleased album which is actually a track I stole from someone's bandcamp, that ends in a tiny portion of the REAL second track!"

(This is extremely unlikely, I know)

Omikron wrote:I bet Tom's pleased with all this publicity

So the start of the next track that was 'accidentally' left on remains a mystery...
Remember that other fake track from Play By Numbers that came with a high quality scan of (what appeared to be) the actual artwork? It's almost as if someone has the real deal but is teasing the fans by giving us fake tracks instead...

"Here, have an obviously fake track along with a very high res photo of the REAL artwork that no one's ever seen before in such quality!"
"Listen to the first track of this unreleased album which is actually a track I stole from someone's bandcamp, that ends in a tiny portion of the REAL second track!"

(This is extremely unlikely, I know)

Neither is the second one real, He went as far as to put it on tape and put it back to digital sorta to make the quality a little bit worse to make us believe its the real deal, so He definitely put some effort in reproducing the beginning of Wouldn't you like to be free

Well it was fun while it lasted. I assume the culprit has been enjoying this thread.

While it's sad that we didn't find a real pre-Twoism track, I'm sort of happy that this track isn't the real Remmy Kid. Not a bad track, but not what I expected from BoC. Opothecary's hopes for it being B10 are still alive!

And they all lived sadder, if slightly wiser lives...

Listen to ol' cupzy here: Stop getting your hopes up on every fart-sound labelled BoC. If something real does eventually pop up, you'll know. The entire world will know.

"then if anyone says to you, "Look, here is the new BoC", or "There", do not believe it. For fakes will arise and show great signs and wonders so as to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See I have told you beforehand. Therefore, if they say to you, "Look, it is on youtube.", do not go out, or "Look, it is on spotify.", do not believe it. For as the lightning flashes from the East, and flashes to the West, so also will the coming of anything BoC-related be."

So wait, are you telling me that this isn't real? https://www.dropbox.com/s/x129r3j1qtmgg ... 2.m4a?dl=1

Jango9 wrote:So wait, are you telling me that this isn't real? https://www.dropbox.com/s/x129r3j1qtmgg ... 2.m4a?dl=1

Where did you get that from? This sounds like it could easily fit on the pre-Twoism releases! HOLY CRAP GUYS THIS IS IT!!!11!!1!

Omikron wrote:I bet Tom's pleased with all this publicity

So the start of the next track that was 'accidentally' left on remains a mystery...
Remember that other fake track from Play By Numbers that came with a high quality scan of (what appeared to be) the actual artwork? It's almost as if someone has the real deal but is teasing the fans by giving us fake tracks instead...

"Here, have an obviously fake track along with a very high res photo of the REAL artwork that no one's ever seen before in such quality!"
"Listen to the first track of this unreleased album which is actually a track I stole from someone's bandcamp, that ends in a tiny portion of the REAL second track!"

(This is extremely unlikely, I know)

When was Numerator proven to be a fake track ?

Jango9 wrote:So wait, are you telling me that this isn't real? https://www.dropbox.com/s/x129r3j1qtmgg ... 2.m4a?dl=1

That actually sounds kind of cool. What is it ?

That's a recording of a Peruvian Siku ensemble.

Also, this is the second time Hertz HZ has left one of his ambiguous comments on a track that turned out to not be BoC.