____twoism

SamuraiDrifter wrote:

NorthSaturnian wrote:

Buyer rating:
20.0%

I noticed this. He ordered like 3 or 4 items that shipped, but never paid for them. Doesn't say great things about his credibility.

Perhaps he bought Play By Numbers but never paid for it. Aka he broke into Hexagon Sun, Mission Impossible style

Just to summarize about the larger Play by Numbers cover here in case anyone doesn't read the older threads:

The higher res cover is fake. Some analysis was done in the other threads to show this, and also the uploader himself confirmed he faked it.

Not a lot of detail in the baby's face in the original, and nothing added detail-wise in the larger version apart from the title and the 3 in the eyes which were added later. Seems he printed it out on glossy paper, folded it over, added staples and scanned it.

outhudd wrote:Just to summarize about the larger Play by Numbers cover here in case anyone doesn't read the older threads:

The higher res cover is fake. Some analysis was done in the other threads to show this, and also the uploader himself confirmed he faked it.

Not a lot of detail in the baby's face in the original, and nothing added detail-wise in the larger version apart from the title and the 3 in the eyes which were added later. Seems he printed it out on glossy paper, folded it over, added staples and scanned it.

My interpretation was that the uploader was just referring to the supposed "Numerator" audio, not necessarily the image. Apparently the image had been around for sometime before that video and its origin was unclear. All of the analysis I read in the threads was inconclusive (the guy who tried to show where photo editing had been done, for instance, posted a follow-up saying that the original image showed some of the same indicators, and that he may have jumped to conclusions, ultimately ending with "this raises more questions than answers.")

Echelon wrote: Unless he offers some kind of proof, I'm not inclined to believe him. Notice how he only described the song we've heard before.

Agree. Every detail of the reply seems to work out pretty conveniently if anyone ended up asking for more details. Nothing specific is really said. The age of the account is convincing but nothing they're saying is convincing enough for me