Page 217 of 1180

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:29 pm
by adelinyenmah
At least we know they are still working on music lolol

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:33 pm
by cubistking1906
I doubt warp or boc would ever give pitchfork an exclusive confirmation of an imminent release.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:35 pm
by noby
cubistking1906 wrote:I doubt warp or boc would ever give pitchfork an exclusive confirmation of an imminent release.
Well, they didn't. They actually gave the opposite of that.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:49 pm
by GH
You know what? I'm a real fan of BoCs music.

I think all the other stuff is irritating though.

Synthetic mystery. Genetically modified suspense. Granted, Boards are probably the only band alive who could get away with this silly carry on, but that's not to say they should.

Just my thrupenny bit.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:55 pm
by apriorion
I literally loled. I don't often do that (I'm a real stoic, you see), but this is so irritating it's funny, in the sense that it's so perplexing and absurd.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:58 pm
by cubistking1906
like warp is going to be like "yeah, pitchfork we'll tell you the big news without first announcing it ourselves". they got a standard PR response 'updating' us on what we already knew, that music is being made and that no releases have been announced officially.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:54 pm
by Ottomatik
So you guys think this may not be true?

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:07 pm
by The909Virus
I suppose pitchfork were trying to get a response from Warp after all the fuss over the facebook comment and this is their reply?

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:23 pm
by SonicDimension
Twoist wrote: - Bunch of websites now reporting 'BoC confirming new album' based on BoC themselves confirming rumours via a FB response (edit: it's not been pulled)
- Peter Serafinowicz this afternoon tweeting new BoC album confirmation based upon article on a random site which..just reported the FB response, and also PS's double album comment from a few weeks back.
.
Let's keep this thing going; maybe if we all talk and think about the new album enough it will physically manifest from the aether.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:42 pm
by Jonse
Stupid fucking pitchork.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:57 pm
by Saakki
Only few years to the ultimate BoC album! Can't wait 8)

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:26 pm
by holden
"They're definitely working on new material... they forget to mention to Warp that they're only sharing it with their wives and friends."

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:56 pm
by Twoist
Goes to prove what I've always suspected. The online music press is like the Human Centipede, except welded together in some sort of complete circle.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:19 pm
by TaoTapeTao
I don't really consider pitchfork much of a credible source anyways lol, they generally support and promote terrible music with some obvious exceptions.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:18 am
by clipped
TaoTapeTao wrote:I don't really consider pitchfork much of a credible source anyways lol, they generally support and promote terrible music with some obvious exceptions.
just because you don't like the majority of the music they cover, doesn't mean they're not a huge player in the music industry. a pitchfork review can have a huge impact on the success or failure of an album, or even in breaking unknown bands. i would say they're pretty credible in most situations. hell, they were able to interview boc, how many can claim that?

http://pitchfork.com/features/interview ... of-canada/

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:54 am
by GH
I don't think there's any reason to doubt the authenticity of the statement from Warp.

It does make me wonder about the state of the current BoC/ Warp relationship though.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:08 am
by Saakki
clipped wrote:
TaoTapeTao wrote:I don't really consider pitchfork much of a credible source anyways lol, they generally support and promote terrible music with some obvious exceptions.
just because you don't like the majority of the music they cover, doesn't mean they're not a huge player in the music industry. a pitchfork review can have a huge impact on the success or failure of an album, or even in breaking unknown bands. i would say they're pretty credible in most situations. hell, they were able to interview boc, how many can claim that?

http://pitchfork.com/features/interview ... of-canada/
Gotta try this some day :

"Mike: Obviously we didn't have a multitrack recorder, but we had two tape recoders. What you could do is record something on one tape recorder, play it back across two feet of air and while it was playing accompany it with something else on the guitar, the piano, the drums, whatever. We would do this, swap the cassettes over and do it again and again until the tapes started getting so distorted that you couldn't do it any longer. "

8)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:08 pm
by Vexille
TaoTapeTao wrote:I don't really consider pitchfork much of a credible source anyways lol, they generally support and promote terrible music with some obvious exceptions.
If it weren't for pitchfork BoC wouldn't have nearly the amount of fans it does these days.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:50 pm
by emzee
Vexille wrote:
TaoTapeTao wrote:I don't really consider pitchfork much of a credible source anyways lol, they generally support and promote terrible music with some obvious exceptions.
If it weren't for pitchfork BoC wouldn't have nearly the amount of fans it does these days.
Very true, hate pitchfork as much as you want but they have a huge influence on the music market, whether you like it or not.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:55 pm
by Saakki
Image

http://forum.watmm.com/topic/72449-the- ... g-for-boc/

Notice the use of word "for" there.