Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 3:12 am
Can't decide between that or Cold Earth.PlatrixECV wrote:If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.
Can't decide between that or Cold Earth.PlatrixECV wrote:If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.
Dopest beat yet?PlatrixECV wrote:If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.
I swear, sometimes I question whether or not I'm hearing things correctly.PlacentaSand wrote:Dopest beat yet?PlatrixECV wrote:If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.
Subjective portion of the review which I placed little weight on... It does strike me, however, as a seriously funky chopped up hip hop beat.PlacentaSand wrote:Dopest beat yet?PlatrixECV wrote:If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.
i was just quoting the Quietus review.Rodheh wrote:I swear, sometimes I question whether or not I'm hearing things correctly.PlacentaSand wrote:Dopest beat yet?PlatrixECV wrote:If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.
Oh...yeah, I haven't read that. It would drive me insane.PlacentaSand wrote:i was just quoting the Quietus review.Rodheh wrote:I swear, sometimes I question whether or not I'm hearing things correctly.PlacentaSand wrote: Dopest beat yet?
You can hardly make out any details at all...forming an opinion of the track based on this recording is probably a mistake.Rodheh wrote:It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.
I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.
But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.
I know, that's why I said "as far as I can tell" and "90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful". I haven't formed an opinion the song yet, but I just don't get everyone creaming themselves over what it is we can hear in this recording.SmilingHobo wrote:You can hardly make out any details at all...forming an opinion of the track based on this recording is probably a mistake.Rodheh wrote:It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.
I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.
But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.
I don't even understand why they'd release two tracks early, possibly three if the teaser track is on the album. It's too much man, it just is going to make hearing the album for the first time less special. Like, I already know Reach For the Dead isn't going to be anywhere near as interesting on the album now.wwbjd wrote:Sounds good.
It's like the ATP recordings, happening, in real time for something that hasn't been released yet.
If anything happens tomorrow @ 5:00 PDT, then it's going to have to do with this track (if this is BoC and it sure sounds like it). Why play a new different track at a music festival and let it sit out there on the net in such poor sound quality?
Then again I'd wonder why they'd release two tracks so close together.. ugh. Speculation is driving me insane.
It does lessen the whole album experience a bit, at least initially. After awhile though it should blend back to together I listened to Alpha and Omega and Oscar See Throug Red Eye ad nauseum before their respective albums were released in full. The fact that they were preview/singles/teasers had escaped my memory until it came up in context with Reach for the Dead.Rodheh wrote:I don't even understand why they'd release two tracks early, possibly three if the teaser track is on the album. It's too much man, it just is going to make hearing the album for the first time less special. Like, I already know Reach For the Dead isn't going to be anywhere near as interesting on the album now.wwbjd wrote:Sounds good.
It's like the ATP recordings, happening, in real time for something that hasn't been released yet.
If anything happens tomorrow @ 5:00 PDT, then it's going to have to do with this track (if this is BoC and it sure sounds like it). Why play a new different track at a music festival and let it sit out there on the net in such poor sound quality?
Then again I'd wonder why they'd release two tracks so close together.. ugh. Speculation is driving me insane.
Nice to see that crowd there with the huge hexagons. Warp has gone all out on this one, and that's a good thing!wwbjd wrote:Pic from the show: