youre wrong as a human being for thinking thatRodheh wrote:Ensoi wrote:I don't understand what's everyones deal with TCHP, it's my favourite BOC album but not many people seem to like it.boardsofdublin wrote:
Thats just because TCHP is crap, took you a while to realise is all
It was the follow-up to what is arguably their most intricate and meaningful album, and it disappointed a lot of people, that's why.
Not me, I really enjoy most of TCH, but I can acknowledge it was a step down from Geogaddi.
Did the Campfire Headphase always sounded like this?
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
-
MAXIMUS MISCHIEF
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:10 pm
Re: Did the Campfire Headphase always sounded like this?
-
Fearless Flounder
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: England
I think everyone is entitled to their own ideas about which records are the most successful. Although I think it is unfair to label TCH as 'crapped out'. Quite clearly a lot of effort has gone into making that record. The attention to detail is unreal and you dont need to be a studio gear head to spot that. Also the whole idea of it being 'straight' I wouldn't wholly agree with. On the surface yes, it sounds more conventional and might appeal to a broader audience, but there's a load of really weird shit going on within those tracks that doesn't jump out immediately in much the same way as it did on the earlier records. It probably was their intention to make something that on the surface is accessible, but that serves as a decoy for something altogether stranger happening within the tracks.
My personal favourites are the earlier records but that's probaly only because they represent a special time for me, but that doesn't mean that TCH is redundant. I'd definitely find it more interesting that they'd be attempting something new always.
My personal favourites are the earlier records but that's probaly only because they represent a special time for me, but that doesn't mean that TCH is redundant. I'd definitely find it more interesting that they'd be attempting something new always.
Re: Did the Campfire Headphase always sounded like this?
MAXIMUS MISCHIEF wrote:youre wrong as a human being for thinking thatRodheh wrote:Ensoi wrote: I don't understand what's everyones deal with TCHP, it's my favourite BOC album but not many people seem to like it.
It was the follow-up to what is arguably their most intricate and meaningful album, and it disappointed a lot of people, that's why.
Not me, I really enjoy most of TCH, but I can acknowledge it was a step down from Geogaddi.
I'm wrong "as a human being"? What sort of bigoted, intolerant comment is th
Oh, holy shit. You spelled "you're" properly in this context. That's a first witness for me regarding this particular sort of comment. Great job.
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
Re: Did the Campfire Headphase always sounded like this?
Kinski wrote:i never said you're not suppose to llike what i don't like.pointlessdude wrote:Fixed that for you.Kinski wrote:STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE!!! I SPEAK THE TRUTH!!!111111
Your opinions in this thread certainly seem to allude to such thought.
Also, I know what the doppler effect as well as nostalgia are. I mean, what is the culmination of those two terms? How does that have anything to do with MHTRTC? Also, I'm not sure I heard the doppler effect even once in MHTRTC.
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
-
MAXIMUS MISCHIEF
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:10 pm
Re: Did the Campfire Headphase always sounded like this?
clearly its one that you secretly agree with and know is true based on how much you just FREAKED OUTRodheh wrote:MAXIMUS MISCHIEF wrote:youre wrong as a human being for thinking thatRodheh wrote:
It was the follow-up to what is arguably their most intricate and meaningful album, and it disappointed a lot of people, that's why.
Not me, I really enjoy most of TCH, but I can acknowledge it was a step down from Geogaddi.
I'm wrong "as a human being"? What sort of bigoted, intolerant comment is th
Oh, holy shit. You spelled "you're" properly in this context. That's a first witness for me regarding this particular sort of comment. Great job.
-
boardsofdublin
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Dublin
but you aren't arguing over something that is important to you but not to me; I have opinions on the Campfire Headphase too but I recognize them as opinions, and not group consensus. These last few pages have been "I don't at all care for TCH" vs "TCH is teh gr8st, you're full of it" and it's an uninteresting, unwinnable argument in that context; If there was elucidation on why TCH was good or bad, that'd be a much more entertaining read than "It's shit" / "No it isn't" / "yes it is" / back and forth, over and fucking over. Gods damn.
Also, way to step up your game R. d3v3l has been giving you a real run for your money as 'worst boarder on twoism' but I think you beat him out here.
and lastly folktronica would refer to song structure + instrumentation, rather than just instrumentation.
Also, way to step up your game R. d3v3l has been giving you a real run for your money as 'worst boarder on twoism' but I think you beat him out here.
and lastly folktronica would refer to song structure + instrumentation, rather than just instrumentation.
Lens Larque wrote:For a while I was wondering what happened to the Depression thread and I was not sure if that was good or bad news.
Cryabetes wrote:but you aren't arguing over something that is important to you but not to me; I have opinions on the Campfire Headphase too but I recognize them as opinions, and not group consensus. These last few pages have been "I don't at all care for TCH" vs "TCH is teh gr8st, you're full of it" and it's an uninteresting, unwinnable argument in that context; If there was elucidation on why TCH was good or bad, that'd be a much more entertaining read than "It's shit" / "No it isn't" / "yes it is" / back and forth, over and fucking over. Gods damn.
Also, way to step up your game R. d3v3l has been giving you a real run for your money as 'worst boarder on twoism' but I think you beat him out here.
and lastly folktronica would refer to song structure + instrumentation, rather than just instrumentation.
"Worst boarder on Twoism."
Really? You honestly think I'm that bad? I'm flattered. Although, I'd appreciate you state my full name instead of hiding behind the first letter so that way I could receive full credit.
Seriously though, while I agree most of this discussion has been stupid, I tend to just have a pet peeve of sorts with the kind of comment you made. No hard feelings against you, personally, it's something I observe throughout the internet.
Initially, I had guessed that MOST LIKELY, the people on this board posting would not respond they way they did to the various jokes, incoherent off-topic posts and overly-exaggerated false stories posted as of recently, as ridiculous they might be, since we're talking about a basically dead (atm) band who has blown off their fans quite staggeringly. We'd reached a point here where we've discussed Boards of Canada dog and panda puns. Seriously.
Apparently though, we're still too uptight that somebody cannot post an observation about an album sounding (excuse me, sounded) different to them without a backlash of unrelated "TCH SUCKS" nonsense. Apparently we're still too uptight that people, disagreeing with the stupidity, cannot respond and criticize those who started it without being called "nerds arguing over soundwaves". And, apparently we're still too uptight that making a criticism of said comment results in being "the worst boarder on Twoism".
Maybe I'm just too confused from sleep deprivation, but I see something extremely unnecessary here. It's unfortunate that this whole thing started to begin with, but it's even more unfortunate that people feel the need to escalate it.
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
First of all, guys, just stop already, and second
The so-called "folktronica" rarely has clear or defined structures, and if it has, it's pretty much always standard pop song structures.Cryabetes wrote:and lastly folktronica would refer to song structure + instrumentation, rather than just instrumentation.
noby wrote:First of all, guys, just stop already, and second
The so-called "folktronica" rarely has clear or defined structures, and if it has, it's pretty much always standard pop song structures.Cryabetes wrote:and lastly folktronica would refer to song structure + instrumentation, rather than just instrumentation.
K GUYS JUST STOP
SO I CAN START MY POINT ON FOLKTRONICA
LOLOLOL
JK Noby, just messin'.
I'm down to stop the confrontation, so long as everyone else is.
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
let's just keep folktronica out of this, and out of existence for that matter.
i don't know campfire used to sound so groundbreaking and for some reason now it sounds like this. it's totes weird.
i don't know campfire used to sound so groundbreaking and for some reason now it sounds like this. it's totes weird.
softfokus wrote:let's just keep folktronica out of this, and out of existence for that matter.
i don't know campfire used to sound so groundbreaking and for some reason now it sounds like this. it's totes weird.
Sounds more like this:
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
Re: Did the Campfire Headphase always sounded like this?
i seriously don't get you. i try to be nice to you but you're like a brick wall and take everything i say at face value. i guess tool does that to people.Rodheh wrote:Kinski wrote:i never said you're not suppose to llike what i don't like.pointlessdude wrote: Fixed that for you.
Your opinions in this thread certainly seem to allude to such thought.
Also, I know what the doppler effect as well as nostalgia are. I mean, what is the culmination of those two terms? How does that have anything to do with MHTRTC? Also, I'm not sure I heard the doppler effect even once in MHTRTC.
see, now i know you're gonna be upset because i badmouthed tool again. i'm just some dude from poland, why do you even care? let's chill out and talk some music.
as for doppler-effect, here's a quote form the band, i hope you'll believe them more than you believe me:
from an interview about mhtrtc!You know when you're on a ride at a fairground, the pitch of the music rises and falls because of the Doppler-Effect? That's another thing we love to do in our tracks, and it's a fairly psychedelic-sounding effect too."
