Page 339 of 1180
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:14 pm
by vanlorne
Treefingers wrote:b0qurant wrote:vanlorne wrote:all of this is starting to hurt my brain a little
Shit's gettin' math-y
Boards of Canada with math rock elements just came into my head.
i'm am starting to go through withdrawal on these slow days
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:18 pm
by vanlorne
Treefingers wrote:
Boards of Canada with math rock elements just came into my head.
This could be. Weren't they talking about learning toward more guitars and less electronics after TCH?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:21 pm
by yellow-jacket
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:27 pm
by Mexicola
OK, I'll bite.... is there your own work and would you care to enlighten us further?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:36 pm
by yellow-jacket
the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.
yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:37 pm
by DaveJ
yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.
yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
The jeep background told you that? How so?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:37 pm
by Capt Kittinger
Have the boxes around the blank code and "One Got Fat" in Julie and Candy been mentioned? Apologies if they have, I just got up and saw it mentioned elsewhere.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:39 pm
by yellow-jacket
because i realized that the background had to do something with the description on the julie and candy video
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:40 pm
by vanlorne
DaveJ wrote:yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.
yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
The jeep background told you that? How so?
because of the snow I'm assuming is the implication
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:40 pm
by North by North
Capt Kittinger wrote:Have the boxes around the blank code and "One Got Fat" in Julie and Candy been mentioned? Apologies if they have, I just got up and saw it mentioned elsewhere.
Si.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:42 pm
by North by North
yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.
yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
You have the first code reversed on your picture- for a reason?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:45 pm
by DaveJ
vanlorne wrote:DaveJ wrote:yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.
yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
The jeep background told you that? How so?
because of the snow I'm assuming is the implication
ah right, but that pic leaves out 1977, and I assumed "amateur footage" was a single clue, not 2.
Also if you chose that snowy pic coz people were saying their youtube account changed the background to that today, apparently it has always been that, at least for some time. If so, I don't see what that pic and the numbers have in common whatsoever.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:45 pm
by corwood
1977 ist left out at the beginning here...
snow comes second not in the first position
and amateur footage is one thing in my opinion
the reversed number 247997 would go to position 2
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:46 pm
by yellow-jacket
well, i knew that it was reversed originally because of the 2 first numbers beside the very first number, and the rest are on the opposite side.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:46 pm
by corwood
DaveJ wrote:vanlorne wrote:DaveJ wrote:
The jeep background told you that? How so?
because of the snow I'm assuming is the implication
ah right, but that pic leaves out 1977, and I assumed "amateur footage" was a single clue, not 2.
Also if you chose that snowy pic coz people were saying their youtube account changed the background to that today, apparently it has always been that, at least for some time. If so, I don't see what that pic and the numbers have in common whatsoever.
exactly
but it's natural that we try to combine the two elements we have right now
the pic and the code without position
makes a bit sense
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:51 pm
by isotoxal
I think the speculation has reached the grade of utter balls. I guess nothing new will happen until more clues appear.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:52 pm
by yellow-jacket
then i'm not even sure if i'm on the right track as everyone else.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:53 pm
by sunshine recorder
5d from closes vol1. is that common knowledge?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:59 pm
by North by North
sunshine recorder wrote:
5d from closes vol1. is that common knowledge?
YES- thank you for saying this. I was thinking maybe they did it just to add to their whole mysteriousness. And maybe they like the video, or think it's funny someone labeled it 5d.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:00 pm
by Elexen
