Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 10:02 pm
Boy, this BOCporn is pretty hardcore sometimes

I think that sounds pretty bang on to meAesthetics wrote:I heard someone coughing?
Here is a version without slowing down RftD in the beatpart. It sound pretty good but I still don't think this is intentional done by BoC.
optic wrote:I'm absolutely thrilled all this is working, but what are the implications? This doesn't seem to me to be something that is just an exercise in "we can do this, so we did" by the BS. This all LEADS to something.
You're only guaranteed to have at least five key pairs if your intention is to have as much variety in keys as possible. Probabalistically, it'd be more likely to see at least one key signature with three songs, and more odds and ends. That's what most albums look like.egbdf wrote:Can someone answer me why we think this is special when there are 17 tracks, and only 12 keys, and therefore guaranteed to be at least 5 key pairs? That and the RFTD/Come to Dust thing?
I was thinking the exact thing !BuShPuPpEt0 wrote:If I remember correctly wasn't there a rumor about a "double album?" Could this be it?
justin wrote:I was thinking the exact thing !BuShPuPpEt0 wrote:If I remember correctly wasn't there a rumor about a "double album?" Could this be it?
This sounds really good! I wonder why they didn't have it fade like this or have them put together in the actual tracklisting, along with all the other pairs.Aesthetics wrote:I heard someone coughing?
Here is a version without slowing down RftD in the beatpart. It sound pretty good but I still don't think this is intentional done by BoC.
can someone who does this correctly upload their "twins" in full onto youtube, please?qroniq wrote:I gotta go try this out.........!!justin wrote:optic wrote:At the end of the reach for the dead video, there are those two spheres that divide from the sun, while the original sphere looks like it's fading (dying?). At first I thought it was a reference to the trinity (yeah, I know, I know) but now seeing this, could it be that all of the twins are derived from the outliers (the "special" tracks) in form and/or structure?
I've also noticed in many of the tracks that themes that seem to follow each other either in unison or support and then suddenly change when one of the themes varies. I've thought a lot about how this (as well as other indicators such as how there are two separate "parts" to the songs, two columns of structure, seemingly two "sides" to the album, etc.) might be an insight to how the brothers are drifting apart. Constants are changing.
You're on to something ...
At 4:27 or 20 seconds till RFD ends the Lights divide in the video . If you press play for Come To Dust at the 4:27 mark of RFD both songs overlap and fade into each other perfectly and exactly at the end of RFD the drums should kick in for Come To Dust .
This also holds the same for the other matching tracks . They are twins .
No wonder this album took 8 years !!! .
armotron wrote:can someone who does this correctly upload their "twins" in full onto youtube, please?qroniq wrote:I gotta go try this out.........!!justin wrote:
You're on to something ...
At 4:27 or 20 seconds till RFD ends the Lights divide in the video . If you press play for Come To Dust at the 4:27 mark of RFD both songs overlap and fade into each other perfectly and exactly at the end of RFD the drums should kick in for Come To Dust .
This also holds the same for the other matching tracks . They are twins .
No wonder this album took 8 years !!! .
if the two wavs are the same you invert one channel...[not reverse] play them together and they will cancel each other out. if both have the code sounds embedded but the inverted channels code was not inverted then when the two tracks get played together the common non-inverted parts would be revealed.justin wrote:Do you know the process of how they did that ?