Page 5 of 5

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:18 pm
by Geogandhi
revertedhexagon wrote:Am i the only one who doesnt give a hoot? Its just an ad.
No you're not. I could care less either. Just the anti Nike argument is flimsy and it got mentioned *ad nauseum*

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 4:34 pm
by A_Northern_Soul
Really mixed feelings about artists selling music to ads; I tended to agree with Bill Hicks' line about the artistic roll call. Now I'm not so fussed - it's so tough to make money in the music industry now, unless you're U2 or similar. So if advertising is what it takes to avoid taking a day job, or paying for a bit of kit, then fair enough.

And if you live in a capitalist society then you inevitably benefit from the exploitation of others. You can try and minimise it all you want, but a glance at the "made in..." labels in my clothes might reveal some uncomfortable truths. Like it or not, we're all complicit.

I have always liked Nick Cave's line on licensing to advertisers though (the answer is always no). He once said that he gets letters from people telling him how much X song means to them as it was played at their wedding* or a loved-one's funeral. He said he then couldn't bear it if those people then went on to hear that same song advertising "fucking Cornettos".

* - I still can't hear "Into My Arms" without thinking of the morning of my wedding day, sat with my Dad and best man eating bacon sarnies.

Re:

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 1:30 am
by Orbited insanitarium
re-phaelam-ed wrote:
Jakerpoo wrote:yeah, kind of a lame application for the song. not that great of a commercial either. maybe they were hoping the song would save it
money talks
Bullshit walks!

Re: Boards of Canada soundtrack new Nike commercial

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:40 am
by arvy
Mmm, I’m lovin it!

;)

Re: Boards of Canada soundtrack new Nike commercial

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:45 am
by rodox_head
arvy wrote:Mmm, I’m lovin it!

;)
Ran Ran Ruuu!