Page 5 of 7
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:00 am
by Elephant Face
I don't think this is what Boards Of Canada wants us to be doing.
Of all the feelings their music can muster, the ones I'm sensing here seem very far from them all.
I hope you guys can accept the possibility of the unknown and chalk it up to the nature of the internet.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:05 am
by Jonse
Elephant Face wrote:I don't think this is what Boards Of Canada wants us to be doing.
With what Fredd-E and mdg have said, I'm 100% sure it isn't.
It has probably been an annoyance to them.
But it's finished now (I guess) and maybe there's something to be learned from it all.
(Unless I'm misunderstanding what you've said.)
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:26 am
by egbdf
Fredd-E wrote:egbdf wrote:Completely off-topic: look at the very first post in this thread. Notice that "ebay" is a link. That scared me. Thought it was malware on my computer. Not that I don't think the forum should try to have a little income to support the site, but this particular method really looks a lot like malware.
Rest assured, it's not malware.
http://www.viglink.com/
Yeah I figured that out after a brief moment of panic, but thanks for the reassurance.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:45 am
by arvy
As soon, as people will give more fuck about new material, than never released.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:29 am
by chronical
arvy wrote:As soon, as people will give more fuck about new material, than never released.
what?

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:01 am
by qazxswplmnko
chronical wrote:arvy wrote:As soon, as people will give more fuck about new material, than never released.
what?

Off topic: I love your profile pic! Who/what/where's it from?
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:29 am
by Techboy
chronical wrote:arvy wrote:As soon, as people will give more fuck about new material, than never released.
what?

he said, boc will say enough is enough as soon as people care more about new material than they do about unreleased material
BTW R35TT side 2 - if you say that this genuinely sounds worse than what you have then you need to send me what you have!
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:31 am
by untitled
Fredd-E wrote:tonx wrote:Would love to see some clarity on this before another thread gets locked.
MDG's final statement not enough clarity then? MDG provided Mike & Marcus the flac files and cassette tape scans. Mike & Marcus analysed both and gave their feedback to MDG. MDG relayed us the feedback. Something tells me we can trust the people who actually made the tapes and the music on it.

no way jose (i mean fredd-e).
1. i can't imagine mike and marcus doing petty analysis like that.
2. something tells me we can trust anybody or nobody or something in between (preferably at a roll of a dice?)
3. clarity? where? he said 100% those are some old files which are clearly not. if he said "dudes, chill out, the 192kbps versions you had were a more true experience, trust me" was actually more clear and valuable than this 100% horse manure
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:01 pm
by frank chipboard
untitled wrote:Fredd-E wrote:tonx wrote:Would love to see some clarity on this before another thread gets locked.
MDG's final statement not enough clarity then? MDG provided Mike & Marcus the flac files and cassette tape scans. Mike & Marcus analysed both and gave their feedback to MDG. MDG relayed us the feedback. Something tells me we can trust the people who actually made the tapes and the music on it.

no way jose (i mean fredd-e).
1. i can't imagine mike and marcus doing petty analysis like that.
2. something tells me we can trust anybody or nobody or something in between (preferably at a roll of a dice?)
3. clarity? where? he said 100% those are some old files which are clearly not. if he said "dudes, chill out, the 192kbps versions you had were a more true experience, trust me" was actually more clear and valuable than this 100% horse manure
Maybe BoC should hold a press conference during half time of the Brazil v Chile game tomorrow to tell the world what some of us already know.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:39 pm
by arvy
chronical wrote:arvy wrote:As soon, as people will give more fuck about new material, than never released.
what?

Hey, maybe it's not the band tell us what to do, maybe it's us firstly who make choices. As soon as I start follow BOC music, I see that dilemma, people don;t wanna push the band for the release of the old unreleased material, for whatever reason it was not released, but also they want that material so badly, it's even not funny
But hey, I also enjoy Old tunes very much, it's contains some of the most beautiful moments in BOC music, maybe it's just no that cult status for me.
Techboy wrote:chronical wrote:arvy wrote:As soon, as people will give more fuck about new material, than never released.
what?

he said, boc will say enough is enough as soon as people care more about new material than they do about unreleased material
Cheers

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:04 pm
by paul
if there's a silver lining to this, i'm thinking the quick response from MDG/ Mike and Marcus with the 'don't pay money for these' could be an indication that the real deal isn't far off.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:32 pm
by Snufkin
paul wrote:if there's a silver lining to this, i'm thinking the quick response from MDG/ Mike and Marcus with the 'don't pay money for these' could be an indication that the real deal isn't far off.
*facepalm*
I'm sorry.. but that's such a complete misreading. The advice to not throw away money is clearly purely as a result of a conviction that the copies now emerging are *not* new audio rips (high quality) but what are believed to be high-quality 'tuned up' versions of the long-time freely available versions.
~Snuf
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:31 pm
by ryetronics
untitled wrote:ok so listen up
first of all, official statements don't close cases unless you are Hitler, Stalin or some other person who is right just because he is "an official."
You lose this thread. FFS
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:54 pm
by paul
Snufkin wrote:paul wrote:if there's a silver lining to this, i'm thinking the quick response from MDG/ Mike and Marcus with the 'don't pay money for these' could be an indication that the real deal isn't far off.
*facepalm*
I'm sorry.. but that's such a complete misreading. The advice to not throw away money is clearly purely as a result of a conviction that the copies now emerging are *not* new audio rips (high quality) but what are believed to be high-quality 'tuned up' versions of the long-time freely available versions.
~Snuf
i think thats been established. i was reading between the lines. too optimistic? ok, but i simply offered an opinion - versus arguing one.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:34 pm
by realspiel
Potato
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:03 pm
by North by North
Tomato
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:20 pm
by drixlin
realspiel wrote:Potato

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:48 pm
by northernlite
RIP this thread
2014-2014
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:58 pm
by drixlin
northernlite wrote:RIP this thread
2014-2014
At least it's more positive now, I really see it as an improvement tbh.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:34 pm
by northernlite
drixlin wrote:northernlite wrote:RIP this thread
2014-2014
At least it's more positive now, I really see it as an improvement tbh.
since we're about to get this thread locked, it's so weird that we joined just a few days apart and our post count is so close haha