Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:36 pm
so funky!!! is this the shape of things to come? i am so giddy!!
It's amazing that they put such a, relatively speaking, high quality in full length on the internets way before its release date.
ZOMG
Page 5 of 11
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:50 pm
Apparently the embedded flash player contains a 128kbps mp3 full length track embedded in the .flv file.
It's amazing that they put such a, relatively speaking, high quality in full length on the internets way before its release date.
ZOMG
It's amazing that they put such a, relatively speaking, high quality in full length on the internets way before its release date.
ZOMG
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:04 pm
nice that people here likes it! 
thats a good sign
cant wait to hear it!
thats a good sign cant wait to hear it!
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:25 pm
Oh, just listen to it already. You know you want to. Give in to temptation!!Archrival wrote:nice that people here likes it!
cant wait to hear it!
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:26 pm
i dont really like the lyrics but boards of canada did great work...i love the ending bit
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:28 pm
Too bad... 
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:33 pm
Why?oyster wrote:Too bad...
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:34 pm
its probably not worth the wait, the songs good but leans more towards the filler side just a bit. The lyrics are funny,but...it sounds like BoC mixed with Cake.Archrival wrote:nice that people here likes it!
cant wait to hear it!
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:42 pm
I'm a little bit ambivalent about it.. but it might grow on me.
But I'm not sure it's so much because of the music... the lyrics seem a bit oppressive to me. (AND I'M NOT, REPEAT, NOT, OPPOSED TO LYRICS)
But I'm not sure it's so much because of the music... the lyrics seem a bit oppressive to me. (AND I'M NOT, REPEAT, NOT, OPPOSED TO LYRICS)
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:50 pm
Cake's a good comparison on the lyrics. I was thinking of a Butthole Surfers song from the 90's (I think it was them). Can't remember the name though it was a popular video at the time.isawdrones wrote:its probably not worth the wait, the songs good but leans more towards the filler side just a bit. The lyrics are funny,but...it sounds like BoC mixed with Cake.Archrival wrote:nice that people here likes it!
cant wait to hear it!
I also don't think it's worth waiting for the official release. A full BoC album I can understand, but a remix?
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:51 pm
I actually thought the lyrics were interesting. Got to say I've been checking out Why? tonight for the first time, but I'm not too fussed. Still wan to hear the original version, but I suspect BOC have remixed this quite heavily - contrary to what I thought at first.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:02 pm
tee heewwbjd wrote:Why?oyster wrote:Too bad...
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:54 pm
ive been into why? for a while so i wasnt really surprised when i heard his voice. some of his songs are a little more singish and some are a little more rappish... usually he has more excitement in his voice than this. i would actually really like to hear this without the vocals, but thats just me.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:57 pm
I like it! It doesn't sound typically BoC, but you can tell it's them because they just know exactly how to make a great track no matter what style it's in. What I like about this track is that it doesn't sound like a typical remix, it sounds solid enough to have been the single and we wouldn't have thought any different. Great work!
dig
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:27 pm
"That wasn't chicken."
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:46 pm
Haha, for a short moment I envisaged BoC swirling in a giant bowl of chocolate and sponge.isawdrones wrote:...it sounds like BoC mixed with Cake.Archrival wrote:nice that people here likes it!
cant wait to hear it!
Does anyone have or know of a way to get a stand-alone version of this track?
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:08 am
so do you guys think this might be a bit of a hint as to boc's direction in the future? we know that when they do remixes they tend to just use the vocals only and rebuild the rest of the track. assuming they've done that here (based on that and the fact that the instrumenals certainly don't sound like something Why? would come up with), this sounds really different from their previous material. we were told there would be some big changes, so hmm...it's interesting. this is definitely a style that doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility for them on an album
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:32 am
I hope this isn't the direction they're heading in, its good...but,......i mean just listen to "everything you do is a baloon" and then listen to that.. This track is nice and catchy but it doesn't connect with me like the Boc that I love.
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:59 am
well they can go in a direction similar to this without it sounding exactly like this remix. I'm just thinking there'll be more live instrumentation and stuff like the part near the end. I wouldn't be so quick to judge a potential new style for them based on one remix.
think of it this way, does the dead dogs two remix totally sum up the campfire headphase? of course not, but it does provide a bit of a taste of the style of the album, I imagine this is likely to be the same
think of it this way, does the dead dogs two remix totally sum up the campfire headphase? of course not, but it does provide a bit of a taste of the style of the album, I imagine this is likely to be the same
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:34 am
i like the music. i don't like the vocals.