Page 5 of 5
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:19 pm
by Jonse
A_Northern_Soul wrote:I'm with Ian on this; I don't buy the argument that we should all be using Linux or whatever and tinkering about with the workings of our computers, and that anyone who just wants the damn thing to work is some kind of Luddite.
But that's not the point at all, and running a Linux OS like Ubuntu doesn't require any tinkering with the workings of your computer unless you want to.
I didn't mean to give off that impression.
It's this whole "it just works" thing that bothers me the most. My father used to say it a lot, who switched from a PC to Mac. His experiences were mainly with horrible computers sold for 400 dollars or less (so essentially, 150 dollar computers) from retail stores like Best Buy or Circuit City. I showed him the computer that I had built ran just fine. I also explained that a computer with the same hardware as the iMac he had purchased for 2000$ (some sort of dual core Intel processor and an Nvidia 8800, this was a few years ago so I can't remember exactly) would have run just fine as well. I also showed him browsers like Firefox and Chromium that completely eliminated all of his problems with his internet browsing, media players like VLC and Media Player Classic that ran all of the files he needed to without ever having to install a codec and I showed him most of the Windows key commands. I saw him use my computer without ever encountering a problem that whole day, doing everything he normally does.
Somewhere along the line though, he jumped back to the persisting statement of "Mac just works", attributing all of the faults of his horrible, old PC to Windows itself, as though he completely forgot.
I see this all the time from Apple users. It bothers me when people who don't know the reason why what they have "works" in contrast to what else they had attribute it to entirely the wrong thing.
I understand the argument for it. Going to the car analogy, it would be one thing if it were like buying a car you pay extra for so that you don't have to maintain it. However, would you still pay extra for that car if there were another one you could pay half the price for and wouldn't have to maintain either, provided you do nothing stupid like burn out the clutch and run it while the oil is low? If the answer is that going that little extra distance to learn how to use it properly is too much for those who are not "technically minded" then I'm not sure I can support that.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:52 am
by pianoforte
I'm beginning to hate UNICEF. They are bombarding my television with advertisements featuring pained-looking puppies and kittens and a voiceover saying 'every life counts' and asking for money. I DON'T HAVE ANY FUCKING MONEY! If I did, I would help you, but I DON'T! STOP MANIPULATING ME! Jesus fucking Christ.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:59 am
by pianoforte
Rodheh wrote:A_Northern_Soul wrote:I'm with Ian on this; I don't buy the argument that we should all be using Linux or whatever and tinkering about with the workings of our computers, and that anyone who just wants the damn thing to work is some kind of Luddite.
But that's not the point at all, and running a Linux OS like Ubuntu doesn't require any tinkering with the workings of your computer unless you want to.
I didn't mean to give off that impression.
It's this whole "it just works" thing that bothers me the most. My father used to say it a lot, who switched from a PC to Mac. His experiences were mainly with horrible computers sold for 400 dollars or less (so essentially, 150 dollar computers) from retail stores like Best Buy or Circuit City. I showed him the computer that I had built ran just fine. I also explained that a computer with the same hardware as the iMac he had purchased for 2000$ (some sort of dual core Intel processor and an Nvidia 8800, this was a few years ago so I can't remember exactly) would have run just fine as well. I also showed him browsers like Firefox and Chromium that completely eliminated all of his problems with his internet browsing, media players like VLC and Media Player Classic that ran all of the files he needed to without ever having to install a codec and I showed him most of the Windows key commands. I saw him use my computer without ever encountering a problem that whole day, doing everything he normally does.
Somewhere along the line though, he jumped back to the persisting statement of "Mac just works", attributing all of the faults of his horrible, old PC to Windows itself, as though he completely forgot.
I see this all the time from Apple users. It bothers me when people who don't know the reason why what they have "works" in contrast to what else they had attribute it to entirely the wrong thing.
I understand the argument for it. Going to the car analogy, it would be one thing if it were like buying a car you pay extra for so that you don't have to maintain it. However, would you still pay extra for that car if there were another one you could pay half the price for and wouldn't have to maintain either, provided you do nothing stupid like burn out the clutch and run it while the oil is low? If the answer is that going that little extra distance to learn how to use it properly is too much for those who are not "technically minded" then I'm not sure I can support that.
My take on this whole Linux-Windows-Macintosh war:
I have said this over and over to many people: There is no perfect system. Software is a means to an end, so whatever system accomplishes your goals best is what you should run. You can even dual-boot if you prefer different systems for different tasks.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:52 am
by A_Northern_Soul
I think that's it, Pianoforte (sorry, can't quote - posting from my Apple device

).
I think it comes down to how you view your computing gear. For me they're devices that serve a purpose, like my shower or oven. Messing about with it's operating system or software when something goes wrong gives me the same amount of pleasure as changing a plug.
In fact I'd probably prefer to change a plug.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:50 pm
by pianoforte
A_Northern_Soul wrote:Messing about with it's operating system or software when something goes wrong gives me the same amount of pleasure as changing a plug.
Whereas for me, "Messing about with it's operating system or software when something goes wrong" is quite a fun pastime!
I can't claim to have endless patience for computer problems, but those that are not "mission-critical nightmare failures" can be quite interesting for me.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:24 pm
by Jonse
I was almost certain that the discussion of apple in this particular thread was about the ethics of the company, not the purposes or ability to "accomplish your goals" of the operating system they've created. Nobody saying you shouldn't dual boot, or calling one OS perfect. The point, again, is about overcharging for hardware.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:07 am
by louise
joop, lonsdale, henley, argos.
anyone in the uk will get why.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:33 am
by TaoTapeTao
Has anyone mentioned Kellogg's? That's my last name lol...
I hate most commercial things mostly because of advertising which is the most obnoxious thing to exist on this planet currently. It's literally a barrage of nonsense that pries into your personal life and spews complete bullshit.
Unless the commercial's funny, then none of that stuff matters.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:35 am
by louise
TaoTapeTao wrote:Has anyone mentioned Kellogg's? That's my last name lol...
I hate most commercial things mostly because of advertising which is the most obnoxious thing to exist on this planet currently. It's literally a barrage of nonsense that pries into your personal life and spews complete bullshit.
Unless the commercial's funny, then none of that stuff matters.
lol. no one is going to mention kelloggs, lets be honest. nestle take up the space for that because of cheerios. groooossssss.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:38 am
by bearhead
TaoTapeTao wrote:Has anyone mentioned Kellogg's? That's my last name lol...
I hate most commercial things mostly because of advertising which is the most obnoxious thing to exist on this planet currently. It's literally a barrage of nonsense that pries into your personal life and spews complete bullshit.
Unless the commercial's funny, then none of that stuff matters.
Frosted Flakes though...
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:40 am
by bearhead
louise wrote:
lol. no one is going to mention kelloggs, lets be honest. nestle take up the space for that because of cheerios. groooossssss.
General Mills makes Cheerios. Hahah.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:57 am
by fujee
louise wrote:lonsdale
My mate has a huge blue lonsdale boxing jumper, he pulls it off quite well imo
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:50 am
by louise
dont disbelieve you essex boiiiiiii
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:35 pm
by Magrathea
Bell Canada
shitty company, shitty service, shitty people, shitty business... fuck you Bell Canada... FOAD!
Thank you