Page 1 of 1

Fact Magazine - One very important thought: MHTRTC at 15

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:25 pm
by Dorrrian

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:38 pm
by Psilcosyn
Good read

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 5:57 pm
by softfokus
it's a good read, but i also disagree with a lot of the opinions expressed in this article.

specifically, i take issue with using the term "twee" in regards to anything boards of canada has done musically.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:28 pm
by Dorrrian
softfokus wrote: i take issue with using the term "twee" in regards to anything boards of canada has done musically.
Yeah. I love this passage from Nico Muhly:

-Now, I have major objections to the word “precious.” It tends to be borderline homophobic in its coded usage, first of all, but second of all, it’s a derogatory adjective with no alternative. It’s reviewspeak. What I mean is: if you say, “that’s ugly” somebody else can say, “no, it’s beautiful.” If you say, “it’s over-stuffed” somebody can say, “really, I thought it was pretty thin.” So the problem with a word like precious is that the scale of adjectives with “precious” on it belongs solely to the reviewer and is just a way of being mean. Case in point: this whole nonsense about Sufjan Stevens’s's BQE Thing. Words like fey, twee, and precious have become these little nuggets of coded disdain, but they are really just useless self-congratulatory gestures on the part of the reviewer. What is the opposite of twee? Muscular? It all reminds me of the insane misogynist critiques of Jane Austen’s novels.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:59 pm
by breadmaker
Dorrrian wrote:
softfokus wrote: i take issue with using the term "twee" in regards to anything boards of canada has done musically.
Yeah. I love this passage from Nico Muhly:

-Now, I have major objections to the word “precious.” It tends to be borderline homophobic in its coded usage, first of all, but second of all, it’s a derogatory adjective with no alternative. It’s reviewspeak. What I mean is: if you say, “that’s ugly” somebody else can say, “no, it’s beautiful.” If you say, “it’s over-stuffed” somebody can say, “really, I thought it was pretty thin.” So the problem with a word like precious is that the scale of adjectives with “precious” on it belongs solely to the reviewer and is just a way of being mean. Case in point: this whole nonsense about Sufjan Stevens’s's BQE Thing. Words like fey, twee, and precious have become these little nuggets of coded disdain, but they are really just useless self-congratulatory gestures on the part of the reviewer. What is the opposite of twee? Muscular? It all reminds me of the insane misogynist critiques of Jane Austen’s novels.
oh nico muhly! you're pretty great.

Dorrrian is your avatar Al Parker?

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:11 pm
by Dorrrian
breadmaker wrote:Dorrrian is your avatar Al Parker?
Yeah :D