San Francisco
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:21 am
This crash.
Part of the sleeve art prophecy unfolding?
Part of the sleeve art prophecy unfolding?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:11 am
No.
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:13 am
apparently the pilot overshot the runway, and it was an airline that only recently started increasing its presence in the U.S... I don't know if that could have anything to do with the accident happening.
what is the point of even making that connection?
what is the point of even making that connection?
Re: San Francisco
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:28 pm
thats it, I'm done visiting the BoC subforum for a whileissuecombustion wrote:prophecy
goodbye everyone
Re: San Francisco
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:48 am
pretty lame dude.issuecombustion wrote:This crash.
Part of the sleeve art prophecy unfolding?
there was extreme high wind warnings for the airport that day. the plane may have been pushed down and had to pull up clipping the seawall.
you realize how fucking lame your thread is? people died.
Re: San Francisco
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:11 pm
re-phaelam-ed wrote:pretty lame dude.issuecombustion wrote:This crash.
Part of the sleeve art prophecy unfolding?
there was extreme high wind warnings for the airport that day. the plane may have been pushed down and had to pull up clipping the seawall.
you realize how fucking lame your thread is? people died.
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:40 pm
Not to continue smashing the contributor but this is the worst thread about San Francisco I have ever read. You really can't go wrong with a thread about San Francisco either.
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:04 am
Sleeve art prophecy? What?
What sleeve art?
And yeah, it sucks that those two people died. Although it quite pisses me off that dozens of people die daily in drone strikes and yet people don't complain about that as much as they do people who die in sudden accidents/attacks.
What sleeve art?
And yeah, it sucks that those two people died. Although it quite pisses me off that dozens of people die daily in drone strikes and yet people don't complain about that as much as they do people who die in sudden accidents/attacks.
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:47 pm
Many of those drone "victims" were busy plotting your demise.
Making this thread even worse: Rodeh
Making this thread even worse: Rodeh
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:12 pm
A casualty of war is a victim so your quotations are unnecessary.Lens Larque wrote:Many of those drone "victims" were busy plotting your demise.
Making this thread even worse: Rodeh
>plotting your demise
Yes, every man, woman and child in Afghanistan wants to destroy us all. Sure.
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:34 pm
You are an unbelievable idiot.
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:38 pm
Classic Lens.Lens Larque wrote:You are an unbelievable idiot.
This isn't WATMM, bud. More effort. Think of something more meaningful to say.
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:51 am
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:44 pm
Just one last comment as it does relate to the premise of the comment in this thread, about an air tragedy in SF.
Rodheh, I did not realize you are just a kid so I apologize. I should not be taunting you like that.
However, this is clear. That you cannot produce actual statistics for this cause you care so very much about, which I assume is civilian death caused by armed drones in Afghanistan, It would do you well to not bandy about non-figures as "dozens killed every day" and "every man, woman and child in Afghanistan" in relation to targets. Are they meaningful?
This shows me that you are not an actual activist. You have no handle on any statistics which should have been at the end of your fingers. Inserting yourself in this thread with a quip about drone warfare, and how important that is to be attentive to, really only serves to give an appearance that you care about these issues, and is self-serving. It is the most you will do to protest the matter. Comment on a message board.
This is truly worse than OP, which may have been in earnest but didn't think very hard about it. Please don't trade on death for your own image.
Rodheh, I did not realize you are just a kid so I apologize. I should not be taunting you like that.
However, this is clear. That you cannot produce actual statistics for this cause you care so very much about, which I assume is civilian death caused by armed drones in Afghanistan, It would do you well to not bandy about non-figures as "dozens killed every day" and "every man, woman and child in Afghanistan" in relation to targets. Are they meaningful?
This shows me that you are not an actual activist. You have no handle on any statistics which should have been at the end of your fingers. Inserting yourself in this thread with a quip about drone warfare, and how important that is to be attentive to, really only serves to give an appearance that you care about these issues, and is self-serving. It is the most you will do to protest the matter. Comment on a message board.
This is truly worse than OP, which may have been in earnest but didn't think very hard about it. Please don't trade on death for your own image.
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:26 am
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/24 ... y-20120925Lens Larque wrote:Just one last comment as it does relate to the premise of the comment in this thread, about an air tragedy in SF.
Rodheh, I did not realize you are just a kid so I apologize. I should not be taunting you like that.
However, this is clear. That you cannot produce actual statistics for this cause you care so very much about, which I assume is civilian death caused by armed drones in Afghanistan, It would do you well to not bandy about non-figures as "dozens killed every day" and "every man, woman and child in Afghanistan" in relation to targets. Are they meaningful?
This shows me that you are not an actual activist. You have no handle on any statistics which should have been at the end of your fingers. Inserting yourself in this thread with a quip about drone warfare, and how important that is to be attentive to, really only serves to give an appearance that you care about these issues, and is self-serving. It is the most you will do to protest the matter. Comment on a message board.
This is truly worse than OP, which may have been in earnest but didn't think very hard about it. Please don't trade on death for your own image.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/15340 ... -civilians
http://www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/05/2 ... civilians/
You can read about it if you want. I didn't bother to post statistics or sources to begin with because the only thing anyone ever says is "you really believe that?"
Although "dozens a day" might be a hyperbole, the numbers are certainly greater than two a day. There is a growing death toll. This bothers me. I'm not attempting to downplay the deaths of those who died in the crash - that's certainly awful - but it drives me crazy that these sort of things get ridiculous coverage while this does not. I come from a military family and this shameful shit annoys me beyond belief. As for this being "the most I do to protest the matter", that's false, I do what I can. I voted for a non-interventionist presidential candidate and I will continue to do so. I've also written to senators on many different occasions. That's about all I CAN do. I have very little power over anyone in the federal government.
Just for future reference - you apologizing for "taunting" me on the grounds that I am "a kid" is more offensive than not apologizing at all. That tells me that, because I am 20, you would exercise a double standard in how you communicate. How about not taunting at people simple because it's the polite thing to do?
Also, truly worse than OP? The OP is taking out of a disaster where people were injured and killed something about sleeve art that he obviously knows is unrelated. How bringing up deaths that, however numerous, are reported by a good deal of sources as happening quite frequently is "truly worse" than OP is beyond me.
That is all I have to say. Forget I ever left the comment if it's such a big deal.
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:53 am
This is where the discussion should have stopped. Right at this meaningless denouncement, complete with 100% ignorance of the obvious logical point made above. How this conversation continued from here baffles me.Lens Larque wrote:You are an unbelievable idiot.
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:54 pm
Ha ha OK, you voted for president and wrote to senators on many occasions. or something. I doubt that ever happened, but it does look like you care. I personally have written many senators about the things.Rodheh wrote:http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/24 ... y-20120925Lens Larque wrote:Just one last comment as it does relate to the premise of the comment in this thread, about an air tragedy in SF.
Rodheh, I did not realize you are just a kid so I apologize. I should not be taunting you like that.
However, this is clear. That you cannot produce actual statistics for this cause you care so very much about, which I assume is civilian death caused by armed drones in Afghanistan, It would do you well to not bandy about non-figures as "dozens killed every day" and "every man, woman and child in Afghanistan" in relation to targets. Are they meaningful?
This shows me that you are not an actual activist. You have no handle on any statistics which should have been at the end of your fingers. Inserting yourself in this thread with a quip about drone warfare, and how important that is to be attentive to, really only serves to give an appearance that you care about these issues, and is self-serving. It is the most you will do to protest the matter. Comment on a message board.
This is truly worse than OP, which may have been in earnest but didn't think very hard about it. Please don't trade on death for your own image.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/15340 ... -civilians
http://www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/05/2 ... civilians/
You can read about it if you want. I didn't bother to post statistics or sources to begin with because the only thing anyone ever says is "you really believe that?"
Although "dozens a day" might be a hyperbole, the numbers are certainly greater than two a day. There is a growing death toll. This bothers me. I'm not attempting to downplay the deaths of those who died in the crash - that's certainly awful - but it drives me crazy that these sort of things get ridiculous coverage while this does not. I come from a military family and this shameful shit annoys me beyond belief. As for this being "the most I do to protest the matter", that's false, I do what I can. I voted for a non-interventionist presidential candidate and I will continue to do so. I've also written to senators on many different occasions. That's about all I CAN do. I have very little power over anyone in the federal government.
Just for future reference - you apologizing for "taunting" me on the grounds that I am "a kid" is more offensive than not apologizing at all. That tells me that, because I am 20, you would exercise a double standard in how you communicate. How about not taunting at people simple because it's the polite thing to do?
Also, truly worse than OP? The OP is taking out of a disaster where people were injured and killed something about sleeve art that he obviously knows is unrelated. How bringing up deaths that, however numerous, are reported by a good deal of sources as happening quite frequently is "truly worse" than OP is beyond me.
That is all I have to say. Forget I ever left the comment if it's such a big deal.
I can see how you wheedle and implore this issue, especially having come from a military family has torn you up. As far as what you CAN do, may I suggest taking place of one of your victims in Afghanistan.
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:24 pm
This is your 'personal quote' from your public photography site. What's that all about Rodheh?Rodheh wrote:Have you seen that movie where Seth Rogenfag plays an arrogant Jewish tool
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:19 am
Can't enlist. I'm too "unstable".Lens Larque wrote:Ha ha OK, you voted for president and wrote to senators on many occasions. or something. I doubt that ever happened, but it does look like you care. I personally have written many senators about the things.Rodheh wrote:http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/24 ... y-20120925Lens Larque wrote:Just one last comment as it does relate to the premise of the comment in this thread, about an air tragedy in SF.
Rodheh, I did not realize you are just a kid so I apologize. I should not be taunting you like that.
However, this is clear. That you cannot produce actual statistics for this cause you care so very much about, which I assume is civilian death caused by armed drones in Afghanistan, It would do you well to not bandy about non-figures as "dozens killed every day" and "every man, woman and child in Afghanistan" in relation to targets. Are they meaningful?
This shows me that you are not an actual activist. You have no handle on any statistics which should have been at the end of your fingers. Inserting yourself in this thread with a quip about drone warfare, and how important that is to be attentive to, really only serves to give an appearance that you care about these issues, and is self-serving. It is the most you will do to protest the matter. Comment on a message board.
This is truly worse than OP, which may have been in earnest but didn't think very hard about it. Please don't trade on death for your own image.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/15340 ... -civilians
http://www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/05/2 ... civilians/
You can read about it if you want. I didn't bother to post statistics or sources to begin with because the only thing anyone ever says is "you really believe that?"
Although "dozens a day" might be a hyperbole, the numbers are certainly greater than two a day. There is a growing death toll. This bothers me. I'm not attempting to downplay the deaths of those who died in the crash - that's certainly awful - but it drives me crazy that these sort of things get ridiculous coverage while this does not. I come from a military family and this shameful shit annoys me beyond belief. As for this being "the most I do to protest the matter", that's false, I do what I can. I voted for a non-interventionist presidential candidate and I will continue to do so. I've also written to senators on many different occasions. That's about all I CAN do. I have very little power over anyone in the federal government.
Just for future reference - you apologizing for "taunting" me on the grounds that I am "a kid" is more offensive than not apologizing at all. That tells me that, because I am 20, you would exercise a double standard in how you communicate. How about not taunting at people simple because it's the polite thing to do?
Also, truly worse than OP? The OP is taking out of a disaster where people were injured and killed something about sleeve art that he obviously knows is unrelated. How bringing up deaths that, however numerous, are reported by a good deal of sources as happening quite frequently is "truly worse" than OP is beyond me.
That is all I have to say. Forget I ever left the comment if it's such a big deal.
I can see how you wheedle and implore this issue, especially having come from a military family has torn you up. As far as what you CAN do, may I suggest taking place of one of your victims in Afghanistan.
Unless you mean I should go get killed by a drone, in which case I'd probably be more critical of the rudeness but in all honesty I'm so high right now it doesn't bother me.
Lens Larque wrote:This is your 'personal quote' from your public photography site. What's that all about Rodheh?Rodheh wrote:Have you seen that movie where Seth Rogenfag plays an arrogant Jewish tool
That was a joke. My taste in humor is quite different now so I don't find that funny (I don't even use that stupid site anymore either). It was about how Jude Apataow would make these frat/stoner comedy and dramedy films over and over again and he's cast Seth Rogen and Jonah Hill and a bunch of other revolving actors (that happened to be jewish, since he's jewish and tends to cast other jews) that he would use in almost every film. Now of course, there's nothing wrong with that at all. What bothered me is that film after film he'd receive tons of acclaim for films that are absolutely horrible. "Knocked Up" is the worst - unfunny, inane film (in my opinion) - and it has a 91% on Rotten Tomatoes. Basically according to critics, Apatow can do no wrong even though he keeps making basically the same shitty movie over and over again. I was more into film back when I wrote that and was actually working for a paper as a film critic, so that was quite annoying.
Now, the part about Seth Rogen specifically has to do with his roles in these films - he's always an arrogant, stupid douchebag (the character he's cast as, not Seth Rogen himself). Not once have I seen him play a character that wasn't exactly that. In these movies, his character, for reasons that baffle me to this day as this is completely uncalled almost every time it occurs, happens to have a weird tendency to announce something in his character's life pertaining to his religion, or reference something pertaining to Judaism. Adam Sandler does this in his films as well. Honestly, I think the only time anybody needs to write in a line where a character brings up religion (whether it be Judaism, or Christianity, or Islam or whatever) is when it has a point and/or is related to the story.
So yeah, that's what that's about.
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:33 pm
This is getting rich. This was your candidate for president:
Here you argue with a little girl:
But my sympathies, because you are in chronic pain all the time. Enough it seems, to take all of your prescribed medicine at once.
Here you argue with a little girl:
But my sympathies, because you are in chronic pain all the time. Enough it seems, to take all of your prescribed medicine at once.