Page 1 of 2

2001 A Space Odyssey - Re-released in UK Cinemas Nov/Dec

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:26 pm
by Mexicola
Kudos to bkillsb for flagging this up.

The greatest movie of all time? The greatest single leap in cinema since (certainly Sci-Fi cinema) since Lumiere? Years ahead of it's time? The inspiration for pretty much every science fiction movie since? Kubrick's standout work in a career of masterpieces? Perfection?

Not for me to say. All I'll say is that it will fulfill a lifetime's dream to see this as it was intended, ie. on the big screen

New trailer literally had me welling up with excitement!

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:33 pm
by Cupz
WUTWUT IN A THEATRE NEAR U?

I'd looooove to see this in the BIG screen maaaaan. Smoke me some strong ass weed...

I swear this movie will change the world a second time.

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:38 pm
by Mexicola
Oh, I'll travel to see it in the cinema man!! :lol:

Looking at a 50 mile round trip at least, but it'll be so worth it.

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:10 pm
by arvy
I guess at my local cinemas, it will not be showing on 35mm, so so I don't see a point going to watch a digital on the big screen, if it will be shown at all, is this a UK only? :)

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 2:32 pm
by 2020k
When does Interstellar come out in the UK? Will they be competing?

I love JJ Abrams, and am not trying to make comparisons, just interested.

2001 forever.

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 2:34 pm
by Mexicola
Not sure. Until this morning I'd not even heard of Interstellar and I need to find out more about it.

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:55 pm
by vballs
This is great news, mainly because ive only ever seen little bits here and there. Its something ive never gotten around to watching all the way through. Now I get to experience it for the first time in the cinema :-)

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:00 pm
by Mexicola
vballs wrote:This is great news, mainly because ive only ever seen little bits here and there. Its something ive never gotten around to watching all the way through. Now I get to experience it for the first time in the cinema :-)
I'm actually a little jealous of you! :shock:

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 5:23 pm
by jcnporter
This is fantastic news!

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:30 pm
by fujee
Definitely on the Brighton date. Day before new years too, perfect way to ease myself into the permanent annoying let down that is NYE haha.

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:56 pm
by Mexicola
Tickets booked. Novayshun and Rikkiebags in too. Twoism represent! :lol:

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:06 pm
by fujee
Its funny, I was talking film with two friends on my course today, who are pretty clued up on cult and alternative cinema/cinema outside the mainstream... I mentioned this was being screened, immediately after a discussion of how great Tarkovsky is... and neither of them seemed bothered? I was flabbergasted.

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:36 pm
by untitled
fujee wrote:Its funny, I was talking film with two friends on my course today, who are pretty clued up on cult and alternative cinema/cinema outside the mainstream... I mentioned this was being screened, immediately after a discussion of how great Tarkovsky is... and neither of them seemed bothered? I was flabbergasted.
Seems legit.

1. 2001: A Space Odyssey is as mainstream as you can get.
2. IMO it's Kubrick's worst movie, at least in terms of narrative-atmosphere fit. Also, the narrative is gratuitously long-winded (although this could also be a passive-agressive commentary on Beethoven which brings us to our next point...)
3. Stylistically it's identical to Clockwork Orange. Makes sense, you don't just waste such a painstakingly researched visual style on a movie which will be forgotten in 200 years max.
4. Clockwork Orange is 2001: A Space Odyssey Part II. Why?
4.1. Alex is a HAL9000 "in the wild."
4.2. Both are about violence and (re)education.
4.3. They both use the same graphic style (white plastic, bright colors, diffuse lighting, wide spaces etc.)
4.4. They both use music to highlight the motivations of the characters which constructed the things we see on the screen (Beethoven on one hand and the axis defined by The Blue Danube on one hand and the one that's called Daisy
Daisy
Give me your answer do!
I'm
half
crazy,
all for the love
of you
it won't be a stylish marrige
I can't aff
or
d a lab
8u9c,v&*nhffff[[[[xrfgx;icret%h

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:00 pm
by Mexicola
You don't half talk a load of shite sometimes.

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:57 pm
by Mexicola
Also, what the sweet Jesus is Ridley Scott playing at with this by the way?!? Playing with fire boy....

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:11 pm
by Negamuse
Mexicola wrote:Also, what the sweet Jesus is Ridley Scott playing at with this by the way?!? Playing with fire boy....
Calm tha'sen, it's not like he's going to ruin the legacy of a much loved sci-fi franchise by making a poorly executed cash-in followup. This is Ridley Scott! :wink:

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:20 pm
by Mexicola
Hmmmm..... I'll reserve judgement but I'm not as convinced as you I think :wink:

Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 2:39 pm
by A_Northern_Soul
untitled wrote:
1. 2001: A Space Odyssey is as mainstream as you can get.
OK, I'll bite. How exactly is a piece of art's popularity a valid criticism of it's content?

Does something unpopular/"underground" automatically have more artistic merit?

Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:31 pm
by Torn n Frayed
Mexicola wrote:Also, what the sweet Jesus is Ridley Scott playing at with this by the way?!? Playing with fire boy....
Thought that would be news about the sequel to Blade Runner! Not heard of this one yet, hmm mixed feelings to be sure!

Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:47 pm
by Cupz
Torn n Frayed wrote:
Mexicola wrote:Also, what the sweet Jesus is Ridley Scott playing at with this by the way?!? Playing with fire boy....
Thought that would be news about the sequel to Blade Runner! Not heard of this one yet, hmm mixed feelings to be sure!
Meh it could be better then most crap thats out nowadays.