Page 1 of 2
New Boreal Network Site Online
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:29 am
by turquoise70
Hi Twoism, just popping in to say the new Boreal Network site, which i've been working on off-and-on for the past couple of months, is now online. Please enjoy and give me some feedbacks, but preferably the good kind.
http://www.borealnetwork.net
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:32 am
by mechanismj
Lookin' sharp, man.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:56 am
by Joebot Kill
looks great man. super concise. a real breeze to navigate. i appreciate a thorough discography page with easy to find download links. nice

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:23 am
by turquoise70
Joebot Kill wrote:looks great man. super concise. a real breeze to navigate. i appreciate a thorough discography page with easy to find download links. nice

dude thank you! i am glad to hear it is both concise and easy to navigate. those are things i was trying to keep in mind with its conception. i hope the audio player is working for everyone.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:22 am
by Numerator
this is very cool! and as they mentioned, easy to navigate.
can't seem to download Treeborhood though, is that intentional?

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:31 am
by turquoise70
Numerator wrote:this is very cool! and as they mentioned, easy to navigate.
can't seem to download Treeborhood though, is that intentional?

Moodgadget is changing their site, and I have no idea where my stuff is

Sorry man. The Steel Whirl/Empire Builder Single you can still buy off iTunes I think.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:16 pm
by dave_from_2001
I don't get the "about" page. It states your name and city and a disconnected image. It seems as though you don't even want one, which is perplexing. I like that the site is simple.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:45 pm
by ArtOfTheGroove
On my Mac in Safari (4.0.4) nothing is visible on the Discography page except the title and the "Click an album cover on the right..." text.
Works fine in Firefox though...
Otherwise, very cool!
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:07 pm
by Aesthetics
Nice work!
Nice background picture, simple setup which imo is a good thing.
The myspace button is out of place though, it links offsite while all the others don't. The myspace link in the contact section, together with all the other url's should been placed in a link section. In the contact section you should put a contact form or email or something. Besided this technical twaddle the site really is great!
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:34 am
by turquoise70
dave_from_2001 wrote:I don't get the "about" page. It states your name and city and a disconnected image. It seems as though you don't even want one, which is perplexing. I like that the site is simple.
The truth about that is, I've never written - or been given - a description for Boreal Network that I like. If I go super straightforward and just say, I started writing music around 2002 and started releasing it around 2006, etc. that could work but that kind of sucks all the fantasy and imagery out of it. It's a work in progress, though. I'll add to it if I can ever work out a palatable way of doing so. For now I think it says all it needs to.
ArtOfTheGroove wrote:On my Mac in Safari (4.0.4) nothing is visible on the Discography page except the title and the "Click an album cover on the right..." text.
Works fine in Firefox though...
Otherwise, very cool!
Crap! Cross-browser compatibility is something I'd love to strive for. I don't have a Mac so I'll have to wait till my classes start and I can check it out on the Macs at school and see what's wrong with it. I wonder why it does that. Thanks for mentioning it though!
Aesthetics wrote:Nice work!
Nice background picture, simple setup which imo is a good thing.
The myspace button is out of place though, it links offsite while all the others don't. The myspace link in the contact section, together with all the other url's should been placed in a link section. In the contact section you should put a contact form or email or something. Besided this technical twaddle the site really is great!
Yeah, that's fair. I thought of breaking the Contact page into a Contact and a Links page, but I didn't want to add another navigation button. As I said, the site is open for development and changes, so maybe in the future I will do that.
Thanks for your feedback guys! I need to hear these things cause when (hopefully) I'm designing sites for other people, and not just my own personal music site, their input is going to count before mine.
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:58 pm
by powershoes
for some reason, none of the text displays properly in firefox. i have the fonts from your stylesheet, so beats me.
i like the clean navigation. represents well. the audio player is awesome, especially when i press play.
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:29 pm
by BrandNewRetro
Oooh I like it, looks lovely

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:50 am
by locustlx
great website man...only thing is in discog page doesn't appear in Chrome or Firefox (all i get is a blank spot) works perfectly in internet exlorer
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:05 am
by BrandNewRetro
locustlx wrote:great website man...only thing is in discog page doesn't appear in Chrome or Firefox (all i get is a blank spot) works perfectly in internet exlorer
It works fine in my Firefox, ahhh the complications of web browsers

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:26 am
by ArtOfTheGroove
OK, this was bugging me so I looked into it a bit -
I fixed your Discog page problem in Safari, here are the details:
At around line 384 you had overflow style parameters inline in the div. Since your DOCTYPE is xhtml this is not allowed. The fix is to put the overflow style in the local style section at the top of the page. (gotta show this as an image because the forum BBcode won't let me put the div code in, even with code tags...)
That's it - tested in Safari and Firefox on the Mac - IE6 on the PC (sorry, didn't have a machine with IE7 & 8 lying around). BTW: It fixes the problem on IE6 PC as well.
Hope this helps...
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:06 pm
by turquoise70
ArtOfTheGroove wrote:OK, this was bugging me so I looked into it a bit -
I fixed your Discog page problem in Safari, here are the details:
At around line 384 you had overflow style parameters inline in the div. Since your DOCTYPE is xhtml this is not allowed. The fix is to put the overflow style in the local style section at the top of the page. (gotta show this as an image because the forum BBcode won't let me put the div code in, even with code tags...)
That's it - tested in Safari and Firefox on the Mac - IE6 on the PC (sorry, didn't have a machine with IE7 & 8 lying around). BTW: It fixes the problem on IE6 PC as well.
Hope this helps...
Dude, rockage! Thanks so much for the in-depth help. Are you on
Doctype by any chance?
However, minor technical point, shouldn't that style declaration that's to go in the Head section be #rightcolumn, not .rightcolumn? Just clarifying to make sure I understand we're still treating it as an ID tag.
I will implement this as soon as I'm back from work today. Thanks again, ArtOfTheGroove!
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:30 pm
by zeitgeist
Try
browsershots.org to see your site in a million different browsers, etc. It can be very helpful if you don't have access to a mac for example. Anyway, the site looks great on my Firefox 3 at 1280x800. Cool beans.
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:06 pm
by ArtOfTheGroove
However, minor technical point, shouldn't that style declaration that's to go in the Head section be #rightcolumn, not .rightcolumn? Just clarifying to make sure I understand we're still treating it as an ID tag.
It doesn't work as an ID with the #, I guess that's because the overflow parameter isn't allowed in an ID but only in a class when validating in xhtml?
Maybe someone with more knowledge of xhtml can shed some light on the issue, but it does work correctly as a class with .rightcolumn
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:49 pm
by turquoise70
ArtOfTheGroove wrote:However, minor technical point, shouldn't that style declaration that's to go in the Head section be #rightcolumn, not .rightcolumn? Just clarifying to make sure I understand we're still treating it as an ID tag.
It doesn't work as an ID with the #, I guess that's because the overflow parameter isn't allowed in an ID but only in a class when validating in xhtml?
Maybe someone with more knowledge of xhtml can shed some light on the issue, but it does work correctly as a class with .rightcolumn
well, if you're declaring it as .rightcolumn in the style sheet, you're identifying it as a class, that's what the '.' means, so you should have rightcolumn be the class of the div - you can give it both an id and a class of "rightcolumn" if you want, that works, but i just figured since it was the only rightcolumn on the page, semantically it would work better to have it as an individual id and not as a recurring class.
but i am pretty sure the 'overflow' CSS attribute can be assigned to any block level html element that contains content.
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:55 pm
by CoBoC
That site is hawt nuggets