Gaddafi dead
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:31 pm
Still, for me it would have been preferable that he was just captured and brought to justice. No matter how evil he was, I think it's always better to prosecute a person rather than killing him without a process. Perhaps even more so for logical rather than plain ethical reasons; just like with the execution of Bin Laden, once you start killing people who are unanimously deemed exceedingly evil and criminal, you're simply transcending the jurisdiction that is supposed to give everyone a fair trial and breaking the logic on which it was founded. That is just my personal, idealistic opinion although I understand that events like these happen in the heat of the moment and his execution might not even have been intentional (I only read the headlines about this, I'm ignorant).machinea wrote:I just saw this.. sitting in a cafe perusing the news. Not surprised it ended this way. When your people have turned against you and have guns this is typically the way it goes.
Guido wrote: Still, for me it would have been preferable that he was just captured and brought to justice. No matter how evil he was, I think it's always better to prosecute a person rather than killing him without a process.
machinea wrote:yeah but do they even live in a country with real due process? I'm serious, I have no idea how their justice system truly operates except that it is under Sharia Law. If you preside in a country without a legal system that can be somewhat depended upon to be fair and impartial (as if anything exists in the world but at least some make an effort) I don't imagine one can be expected to get such a thing once captured. Live by Sharia Law die by Sharia Law I guess. He ascended to power via a coup its not exactly unfitting that he dies the way he did. I don't mean to sound unsympathetic. I'm just saying that none of this is surprising in the least.
mechanismj wrote:So which insane dictator is next on the list? Gotta spread that freedom and democracy!
i'm not quite as fervent as that, but it'd be nice of the message (at least, what i THINK the message is to be) of OWS would be able to get the public a little bit better; that is, that it'd be nice if there wasn't so much lobbying, self-interest, and corruption in american politics.Rodheh wrote:mechanismj wrote:So which insane dictator is next on the list? Gotta spread that freedom and democracy!
I personally would like for it to be the entire United States government from the senate on up.
He's safe as houses. No oil.fujee wrote:Kim Jong Il represents the most danger currently, if those nuclear tests were actually nuclear.
Agree.turquoise70 wrote:Nothing I can really add to the sentiments already conveyed.
I saw the video they just released. What a bloodbath. I'm happy he's been stopped, but I'm not happy about the death glorification. Mobs of people acting as though killing someone is cause for Mardi Gras is just morbid to me.
Whichever empire gains all the world's resources wins the game of Monopoloy!Mexicola wrote:He's safe as houses. No oil.fujee wrote:Kim Jong Il represents the most danger currently, if those nuclear tests were actually nuclear.
This. The Chinese were all over Libya taking their oil until Gaddafi became Public Enemy #1 a few months back. Now they're out and the West is in. Fill up yer tanks!Mexicola wrote:He's safe as houses. No oil.fujee wrote:Kim Jong Il represents the most danger currently, if those nuclear tests were actually nuclear.
Pakistan comes to mind...mechanismj wrote:So which insane dictator is next on the list? Gotta spread that freedom and democracy!
lolmechanismj wrote:Whichever empire gains all the world's resources wins the game of Monopoloy!Mexicola wrote:He's safe as houses. No oil.fujee wrote:Kim Jong Il represents the most danger currently, if those nuclear tests were actually nuclear.
