____twoism

Pitchfork got a comment from Warp.

http://pitchfork.com/news/45754-dont-ge ... everybody/

a.

No.


Pitchfork is not a source to be trusted. The supposed comment from Warp only states what it does. At any rate, it means since new material is on the way, an album should be released soon and not in like 5 years.


I'm sick of these hipster douchebags who pretend they know things and then post them with such arrogant claim of legitimacy and then everybody on facebook gets disappointed.

Rodheh wrote:

I'm sick of these hipster douchebags who pretend they know things and then post them with such arrogant claim of legitimacy and then everybody on facebook gets disappointed.

Nuff said mang.

Reading this made me mad. Time to calm down *plays enya*
foooooooooo................... -__- Calm.

Synthestesia wrote:Reading this made me mad. Time to calm down *plays enya*
foooooooooo................... -__- Calm.

Hey mang! I listened your recent album again on one sit from start to end yesterday and I liked it very much. Hopefully this information will help you to calm down

the fact that anyone posted that on pitchfork (or anywhere for that matter) is useless. it's pretty much just making an observation of the obvious: no one has a clue. waste of reading.

Rodheh wrote:No.


Pitchfork is not a source to be trusted. The supposed comment from Warp only states what it does. At any rate, it means since new material is on the way, an album should be released soon and not in like 5 years.


I'm sick of these hipster douchebags who pretend they know things and then post them with such arrogant claim of legitimacy and then everybody on facebook gets disappointed.

They may be hipster douchebags, but they did get an official comment from Warp... It may not be what we want to hear, but it is the first peep we've heard from their label in ages.

always better to be objective and separate your feelings from the facts. pitchfork got warp to comment. there is value in that, whether you like pitchfork or not.

I personally am not a big fan of theirs but like it or not they sometimes include facts on their site among all the shameful hipster claptrap.

I'll see if I can find anything else out.

a.

Rodheh wrote:I'm sick of these hipster douchebags who pretend they know things and then post them with such arrogant claim of legitimacy

Yep....

ryetronics wrote:

Rodheh wrote:No.


Pitchfork is not a source to be trusted. The supposed comment from Warp only states what it does. At any rate, it means since new material is on the way, an album should be released soon and not in like 5 years.


I'm sick of these hipster douchebags who pretend they know things and then post them with such arrogant claim of legitimacy and then everybody on facebook gets disappointed.

They may be hipster douchebags, but they did get an official comment from Warp... It may not be what we want to hear, but it is the first peep we've heard from their label in ages.

Really, because them saying it makes it an official comment from Warp? And you're going to believe a site that is well known for troll behavior, without any sort of screenshots of the message, confirmation links posted on warp or otherwise, that they indeed received an official comment?

The whole "feelings from facts" thing is absurd. If I am to go off facts, I need some proof that what Pitchfork is saying is true, not some half-page thing stating a vague message of anti-hope without anything to back it up other than "we're Pitchfork".

If Warp really does actually send Pitchfork god damned Media information before anyone else has gotten it then this is a sad fucking day and my hopes that the label is comprised of reasonable people will be stirred.

Yeah dude, it's just a website, why would warp officially go there to make any sort of announcement.

Rodheh wrote:

ryetronics wrote:

Rodheh wrote:No.


Pitchfork is not a source to be trusted. The supposed comment from Warp only states what it does. At any rate, it means since new material is on the way, an album should be released soon and not in like 5 years.


I'm sick of these hipster douchebags who pretend they know things and then post them with such arrogant claim of legitimacy and then everybody on facebook gets disappointed.

They may be hipster douchebags, but they did get an official comment from Warp... It may not be what we want to hear, but it is the first peep we've heard from their label in ages.

Really, because them saying it makes it an official comment from Warp? And you're going to believe a site that is well known for troll behavior, without any sort of screenshots of the message, confirmation links posted on warp or otherwise, that they indeed received an official comment?

The whole "feelings from facts" thing is absurd. If I am to go off facts, I need some proof that what Pitchfork is saying is true, not some half-page thing stating a vague message of anti-hope without anything to back it up other than "we're Pitchfork".

If Warp really does actually send Pitchfork god damned Media information before anyone else has gotten it then this is a sad fucking day and my hopes that the label is comprised of reasonable people will be stirred.

Chill out dude...

I love the people here calling Pitchfork hipster garbage.

You know to some people WE'D be considered hipsters?

The Telepathic Kid wrote:I love the people here calling Pitchfork hipster garbage.

You know to some people WE'D be considered hipsters?

I've never thought of BOC or their fans as hipsters. I think to be a hipster you have to be like music from Brooklyn, for instance, the garbage that is animal collective.

Reading that article also made me very mad.

FFS..just write an article when they know something legit.

cbm wrote:

The Telepathic Kid wrote:I love the people here calling Pitchfork hipster garbage.

You know to some people WE'D be considered hipsters?

I've never thought of BOC or their fans as hipsters. I think to be a hipster you have to be like music from Brooklyn, for instance, the garbage that is animal collective.

ok then tell me why Animal Collective is hipster.

Why do people still feel they need to insult people who have different fucking musical tastes to them.
They are not you, you are you, and if you're happy with your musical taste then WHY DO YOU EVEN CARE.

The Telepathic Kid wrote:

cbm wrote:

The Telepathic Kid wrote:I love the people here calling Pitchfork hipster garbage.

You know to some people WE'D be considered hipsters?

I've never thought of BOC or their fans as hipsters. I think to be a hipster you have to be like music from Brooklyn, for instance, the garbage that is animal collective.

ok then tell me why Animal Collective is hipster.

Why do people still feel they need to insult people who have different fucking musical tastes to them.
They are not you, you are you, and if you're happy with your musical taste then WHY DO YOU EVEN CARE.

Because he's a hipster.

esselfortium wrote: Because he's a hipster.

even this annoys me, how old are you? Surely you're old enough to know that name calling is childish.

Pitchfork thread: going from 0 to hostile in record times!

But honestly I haven't been on this forum long enough to know of the fastest thread to put people up in arms.