more website changes?

Tekmosis · Post by **Tekmosis** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:14 am

harpoon dodger wrote:More like retardedville...this should honestly be locked or moved to the other forum due to no actual relevance

Okay, no but seriously... there have been no site chages since, what, the headphone guy icon? Lock this thread.

m.oreilly · Post by **m.oreilly** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:35 am

how was the chicken?

turquoise70 · Post by **turquoise70** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:43 am

I am the entire population of Retardedville. Let's eat spaghetti and spin around in circles in the field til we all puke!

Techboy · Post by **Techboy** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:22 am

No, please keep this thread off-topic, because when it is on-topic it's disturbingly stalker-y...

dave_from_2001 · Post by **dave_from_2001** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:19 pm

what's the point of locking this thread? forums cannot demonstrate perfect action. its an anal retentive blunder. if it will be, i imagine you gals will wince smugly in self-satisfaction--congrats! we need more twee-teens who contribute nothing but smarmy complaint to keep things uncolorful and bnoring around here. warp or "boards" doesen't care that you do, pruning threads as if they were bonsai or suchwhat. gosh!

actually i get it. if someone thinks hex.com background looks "lighter" this thread will have to be fired up again for another week. please delete posts back to where someone thought the background looked "darker" for relevance.

Mindshifter · Post by **Mindshifter** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:09 pm

Is it just me or does the BoC-background look lighter??

Ontopic; we already tired out the little information on the BoC site and newcleardawn. theres nothing more left to say and just wait...

Moebius · Post by **Moebius** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:27 pm

dave_from_2001 wrote:actually i get it. if someone thinks hex.com background looks "lighter" this thread will have to be fired up again for another week. please delete posts back to where someone thought the background looked "darker" for relevance.

yeah, but the background actually /did/ get ligher before

Tekmosis · Post by **Tekmosis** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:24 pm

turquoise70 wrote:I am the entire population of Retardedville. Let's eat spaghetti and spin around in circles in the field til we all puke!

LOL

dp · Post by dp » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:39 pm

turquoise70 wrote:I am the entire population of Retardedville. Let's eat spaghetti and spin around in circles in the field til we all puke!

[/i]

dave_from_2001 · Post by **dave_from_2001** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:43 pm

Moebius wrote:
dave_from_2001 wrote:actually i get it. if someone thinks hex.com background looks "lighter" this thread will have to be fired up again for another week. please delete posts back to where someone thought the background looked "darker" for relevance.
yeah, but the background actually /did/ get lighter before

I know. and I am BETTING ALL that it will not happen again. the LEGENDARY page lightening happened before IABP flash embed dropped FYI noobs, from a dim darkness to sunrise over a week or so.

years later as updates fizzled people swore they could detect shade modulations going so far as to cram the bkgrnd file though digital spectometer analysis for clues... madness.

spagett!!!!!!