wait......

hGc · Post by **hGc** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:25 pm

Here's hoping it's MASK100%

Numerator · Post by **Numerator** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:34 pm

enough with the boc number puns!

turquoisey · Post by **turquoisey** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:59 pm

oh, i just came up with a bunch of cool names for the new album!

Isolated receiver (too bad the song probably isn't real)
The middle of the milky way (hey, there's a black hole there!)
Sagittarius A (see name above)
welcome to Waco (branch davidian related)
Old Tunes remastered, v1+2 (we can only hope!

)

for some odd reason, I keep on thinking that their new album's name is going to be space related. huh, maybe it will be

Chuck Beckles · Post by **Chuck Beckles** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:42 am

The new album will be called Scallywag Curmudgeon and will be heavily influenced by world music.

I really do think it'll have a world music influence though because the WHY? remix had quite a bit of that going on. Sounded pretty excellent too.

CoBoC · Post by **CoBoC** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:24 am

Made up BoC album names? This is sad, guys.

Shadowshocker · Post by **Shadowshocker** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:02 am

Chuck Beckles wrote:I really do think it'll have a world music influence though because the WHY? remix had quite a bit of that going on. Sounded pretty excellent too.

yeah i could see them releasing some tribal like stuff, that would be sweet!

annex · Post by **annex** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:33 am

lp title: 'hauntology owes us money'

wmarsh · Post by **wmarsh** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:44 am

I don't care what the new title is, as long as I can rip off the style and self-publish an album with a saturated picture of a tree on the front.

It will be called Sky Rhombus Sun Annexe.

hexagon son · Post by **hexagon son** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:21 am

wmarsh wrote:I don't care what the new title is, as long as I can rip off the style and self-publish an album with a saturated picture of a tree on the front.

It will be called Sky Rhombus Sun Annexe.

this generated a lol from me

Infinite E · Post by **Infinite E** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:18 pm

annex wrote:lp title: 'hauntology owes us money'

polar sky · Post by **polar sky** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:23 pm

Fuck having Old Tunes remastered! It sounds great just the way it is! All grainy and old. RAW. That's what I like about it.

turquoisey · Post by **turquoisey** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:07 pm

polar sky wrote:Fuck having Old Tunes remastered! It sounds great just the way it is! All grainy and old. RAW. That's what I like about it.

well, maybe they would make it even more raw.

polar sky · Post by **polar sky** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:29 pm

turquoisey wrote:
polar sky wrote:Fuck having Old Tunes remastered! It sounds great just the way it is! All grainy and old. RAW. That's what I like about it.

well, maybe they would make it even more raw.

Raw meaning, not over produced, not mastered, meaning one take on most songs, ect.

dave_from_2001 · Post by **dave_from_2001** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:40 pm

polar sky wrote:
turquoisey wrote:
polar sky wrote:Fuck having Old Tunes remastered! It sounds great just the way it is! All grainy and old. RAW. That's what I like about it.

well, maybe they would make it even more raw.

Raw meaning, not over produced, not mastered, meaning one take on most songs, ect.

This was a concept behind Headphasers was it not? That it may sound like a mysterious cassette mix found on the dashboard of a Datsun 280z? This is almost state of these Old Tapes dubs. It would be kinda ironic to demand masters, considering the Boards project (as I understand it).

polar sky · Post by **polar sky** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:14 pm

dave_from_2001 wrote:
polar sky wrote:
turquoisey wrote:
well, maybe they would make it even more raw.

Raw meaning, not over produced, not mastered, meaning one take on most songs, ect.
This was a concept behind Headphasers was it not? That it may sound like a mysterious cassette mix found on the dashboard of a Datsun 280z? This is almost state of these Old Tapes dubs. It would be kinda ironic to demand masters, considering the Boards project (as I understand it).

I couldn't really understand what you wrote. All I was saying is that The Old Tunes tapes are called Old Tunes for a reason, cause it is early BoC. Now, it has an "Old Sound" it sounds badly dubbed on most songs, which I like. I myself would not want them to remaster their old music because it's sounds great the way it is, I do not need an overproduced version of them. Just like those new Beatles remasters that just came out, they sound like shit, I hate em.

jakestott · Post by **jakestott** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:31 pm

The new album will be called 'Cosmogramma'

The new Flying Lotus album, that is

.

saob · Post by **saob** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:13 pm

wmarsh wrote:I don't care what the new title is, as long as I can rip off the style and self-publish an album with a saturated picture of a tree on the front.

It will be called Sky Rhombus Sun Annexe.

Word.

dave_from_2001 · Post by **dave_from_2001** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:50 pm

polar sky wrote:
dave_from_2001 wrote:
polar sky wrote: Raw meaning, not over produced, not mastered, meaning one take on most songs, ect.
This was a concept behind Headphasers was it not? That it may sound like a mysterious cassette mix found on the dashboard of a Datsun 280z? This is almost state of these Old Tapes dubs. It would be kinda ironic to demand masters, considering the Boards project (as I understand it).
I couldn't really understand what you wrote. All I was saying is that The Old Tunes tapes are called Old Tunes for a reason, cause it is early BoC. Now, it has an "Old Sound" it sounds badly dubbed on most songs, which I like. I myself would not want them to remaster their old music because it's sounds great the way it is, I do not need an overproduced version of them. Just like those new Beatles remasters that just came out, they sound like shit, I hate em.

I agree with you about the Old Tunes! <-- insert at front of last post

polar sky · Post by **polar sky** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:15 pm

dave_from_2001 wrote:
polar sky wrote:
dave_from_2001 wrote: This was a concept behind Headphasers was it not? That it may sound like a mysterious cassette mix found on the dashboard of a Datsun 280z? This is almost state of these Old Tapes dubs. It would be kinda ironic to demand masters, considering the Boards project (as I understand it).
I couldn't really understand what you wrote. All I was saying is that The Old Tunes tapes are called Old Tunes for a reason, cause it is early BoC. Now, it has an "Old Sound" it sounds badly dubbed on most songs, which I like. I myself would not want them to remaster their old music because it's sounds great the way it is, I do not need an overproduced version of them. Just like those new Beatles remasters that just came out, they sound like shit, I hate em.
I agree with you about the Old Tunes! <-- insert at front of last post

I see.

Twoism-ist · Post by **Twoism-ist** » Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:35 pm

annex wrote:lp title: 'hauntology owes us money'

hey man, Boc's music has the right to children.