ATP Julie and Candy high quality
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
It's gone?
I've looked all morning for it and I think it's gone from youtube. If it is BoC, maybe they took it off. Don't think this is news or anything though.
-
Pretty in Pink
- Friendly Stranger
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:15 pm
Re: It's gone?
It's hereMilky wrote:I've looked all morning for it and I think it's gone from youtube. If it is BoC, maybe they took it off. Don't think this is news or anything though.
That would be so nice! But I would want a box set of live tracks. Like Live @ Warp10, Live @ Lighthouse and Live @ ATP. But I would want them to have the same quality as the ATP Julie and Candy.Milky wrote:I'm an idiot, thanks![]()
It's such a good track. I hope they do release something like a live album, with all the ATP tracks together or something. Because then we'd have lots of unheard, old stuff, (Echus) like everyone wants to hear.
I've noticed something strange about one difference between the ATP version and the HQ youtube version...
Here is the youtube version (480p ripped to mp3 for download
)
http://fileape.com/dl/vIHy2vtAvb0Evu6p
And the ATP recording
http://fileape.com/dl/tXqMGRXO5t9oY87r
HQ Julie and Candy (youtube version)
4:35 background synth comes in for two (measures?)
4:42 4 blips comes in (left speaker)
5:20 last set of 4 blips
ATP version
4:37 background synth comes in
4:44 4 blips should be coming in... (but i don't hear it)
Are the two versions possibly different, or does the low quality of the ATP recording make it impossible to hear those 4 blips?
Here is the youtube version (480p ripped to mp3 for download
http://fileape.com/dl/vIHy2vtAvb0Evu6p
And the ATP recording
http://fileape.com/dl/tXqMGRXO5t9oY87r
HQ Julie and Candy (youtube version)
4:35 background synth comes in for two (measures?)
4:42 4 blips comes in (left speaker)
5:20 last set of 4 blips
ATP version
4:37 background synth comes in
4:44 4 blips should be coming in... (but i don't hear it)
Are the two versions possibly different, or does the low quality of the ATP recording make it impossible to hear those 4 blips?
I think it's just the recording quality, the bass is taking over most of the sounds. The blips in the higher quality version are pretty subtle as well. However I think I sort of can hear them, or at least something reminiscent of them but that could just be my senses fucking with me so I'm not sure at all.Are the two versions possibly different, or does the low quality of the ATP recording make it impossible to hear those 4 blips?
- Seeya_Later
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:01 am
just use www.clipconverter.cc
It's the best youtube vid to mp3 site I know. No stupid ads.
I think it may be able to extract a higher quality version
It's the best youtube vid to mp3 site I know. No stupid ads.
I think it may be able to extract a higher quality version
- mechanismj
- Nova Scotia Robot
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:35 am
- Contact:
- Off Janeva
- Friendly Stranger
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:07 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Wise words, this is such a great song, and now I have an audio file. It's so great to find soundboard recordings without the crowd noise, because live tracks so often give us something unexpected and new in each performance. I would appreciate a "BoC Box Set of Live Material" as much as a new album! Especially for all those unreleased songs without names.Seeya_Later wrote:just use www.clipconverter.cc
It's the best youtube vid to mp3 site I know. No stupid ads.
I think it may be able to extract a higher quality version
I'm a man that does not strive for a certain genre, in his music. Ugliness among beauty. Or is the other way, around? Maybe just all ugly.
jeffvaona.bandcamp.com
jeffvaona.bandcamp.com
- WATER_CAN-_-
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 1:33 am
Both the video and the music appear to be incredibly convincing that this is authentic. I would actually have go as far to say that, while the audio is extremely convincing, the video is far more convincing.
Wouldn't that footage be extremely difficult to obtain if it was shown at ATP? Who has the knowhow to make the video a kaleidoscope?
Wouldn't that footage be extremely difficult to obtain if it was shown at ATP? Who has the knowhow to make the video a kaleidoscope?
- Sound quality so high it had to be taken "off the desk"
- Visuals that are (as far as anyone can remember) authentic to the stage projection
- Posted on a Youtube account with no other posts and linked to by the official BoC account - ( and the likelyhood of them finding it if it wasn't them that put it up is pretty slim).
No way this was not an official thing
- Visuals that are (as far as anyone can remember) authentic to the stage projection
- Posted on a Youtube account with no other posts and linked to by the official BoC account - ( and the likelyhood of them finding it if it wasn't them that put it up is pretty slim).
No way this was not an official thing
the modus ponens is strong in this one...MrMessiah wrote:- Sound quality so high it had to be taken "off the desk"
- Visuals that are (as far as anyone can remember) authentic to the stage projection
- Posted on a Youtube account with no other posts and linked to by the official BoC account - ( and the likelyhood of them finding it if it wasn't them that put it up is pretty slim).
No way this was not an official thing
