Red Moon Party?

REDMOON · Post by **REDMOON** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:29 pm

well logic would suggest if the moon code is correct that you only need the numbers

33112204088

interesting is the doubling up of the 3,1,2 and 8 and the single 4 in the middle of the double 0's

ryan70 · Post by **ryan70** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:53 pm

Very interesting. Two thoughts though:

1. What about the 9?

2. Mirroring the whole thing (which made the eye code read forward and the moon code read backwards) is what gave us the right ordering for the eye code. So wouldn't it seem that it also gives us the right order for the eye code, i.e., forward?

Just some thoughts... nice work!

hexagon son · Post by **hexagon son** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:06 pm

i was going to, but because of all the uncertaincy, not being able to afford the train fare because i am going home to canada a week after, added to the fact ive been given a free IOW festival ticket(which will suck compared to seeing BoC live). i doubt it. too much chaos in my life to handle this.

radiateme · Post by **radiateme** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:32 pm

Um.. I'm surprised no one noticed this but holy shit.. the site for www.music836.com , if you right click on the pop up window and click view source, it says the author is eoin michaels! Wtf?

edit - also says Parallel Lines club + some numbers near the bottom.

Code: Select all

<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 11">
<link rel=File-List href="index2_files/filelist.xml">
<link rel=Edit-Time-Data href="index2_files/editdata.mso">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<title>Music 836</title>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:DocumentProperties>
  <o:Author>Eoin Michaels</o:Author>
  <o:LastAuthor>Eoin Michaels</o:LastAuthor>
  <o:Revision>2</o:Revision>
  <o:TotalTime>0</o:TotalTime>
  <o:Created>2006-06-01T17:11:00Z</o:Created>
  <o:LastSaved>2006-06-01T17:13:00Z</o:LastSaved>
  <o:Pages>1</o:Pages>
  <o:Words>18</o:Words>
  <o:Characters>104</o:Characters>
  <o:Company>Capita ES</o:Company>
  <o:Lines>1</o:Lines>
  <o:Paragraphs>1</o:Paragraphs>
  <o:CharactersWithSpaces>121</o:CharactersWithSpaces>
  <o:Version>11.6568</o:Version>
 </o:DocumentProperties>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->
<link rel=Stylesheet type="text/css" media=all href=style.css>
<style>
<!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{mso-style-parent:"";
	margin:0cm;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;
	mso-header-margin:35.4pt;
	mso-footer-margin:35.4pt;
	mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<meta name=description content="Parallel Lines Club, --16-25-3-8-15=--2-15--3">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026"/>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/>
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body bgcolor=black lang=EN-US style='tab-interval:36.0pt'>

<div class=Section1>

<p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
style='font-size:6.5pt;font-family:Arial;color:#333333'><img width=836
height=630 id="_x0000_i1025" src="images/m836.jpg" alt=music836><br
style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]><br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="m836.swf" width="10" height="10">
<param name="movie" value="m836.swf" /></object>
</body>

</html>

ryan70 · Post by **ryan70** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:48 pm

--16-25-3-8-15=--2-15--3

-35 = -10

???

REDMOON · Post by **REDMOON** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:04 pm

Whats the relevance of that 836 site?

radiateme · Post by **radiateme** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:07 pm

REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?

Yeah I don't know either, besides the fact that Archrival posted it and said it was from xltronic.. Can you maybe link to the thread Arch?

sevenELIXIR · Post by **sevenELIXIR** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:16 pm

I don't understand any of this....

Lawrence · Post by **Lawrence** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:37 pm

I used the second line of the Eye image to plot out some rough positions. nt681473, nt201480 etc. etc. The red lines/dots are the numbers in normal order, and the black lines/dots is the numbers in reverse.
I was hoping for a hexagon (with the location at the centre of it), but all I got was this. Oh well.

Archrival · Post by **Archrival** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:48 pm

radiateme wrote:
REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?
Yeah I don't know either, besides the fact that Archrival posted it and said it was from xltronic.. Can you maybe link to the thread Arch?

They have a big banner on the messageboard at www.xltronic.com about PLC 060606.

radiateme · Post by **radiateme** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:15 pm

Archrival wrote:
radiateme wrote:
REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?
Yeah I don't know either, besides the fact that Archrival posted it and said it was from xltronic.. Can you maybe link to the thread Arch?
They have a big banner on the messageboard at www.xltronic.com about PLC 060606.

Ah, thanks. Nice find man! Anyone notice the people in the banner look awfully similar to the people on the etching of that geogaddi promo?

steve-o · Post by **steve-o** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:21 pm

Archrival wrote:
radiateme wrote:
REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?
Yeah I don't know either, besides the fact that Archrival posted it and said it was from xltronic.. Can you maybe link to the thread Arch?
They have a big banner on the messageboard at www.xltronic.com about PLC 060606.

What's up with the music playing for this PLC 666 image?

radiateme · Post by **radiateme** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:21 pm

steve-o wrote:
Archrival wrote:
radiateme wrote: Yeah I don't know either, besides the fact that Archrival posted it and said it was from xltronic.. Can you maybe link to the thread Arch?
They have a big banner on the messageboard at www.xltronic.com about PLC 060606.
What's up with the music playing for this PLC 666 image?

One of their unreleased old tracks? But that's just being hopeful

. Can't wait till tomorrow!

edit - Hmmm you know.. maybe the Parallel Lines Club was what they were called before BoC? Or maybe it's not.... :s

bluesky · Post by **Fredd-E** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:25 pm

radiateme wrote:
REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?
Yeah I don't know either, besides the fact that Archrival posted it and said it was from xltronic.. Can you maybe link to the thread Arch?

http://xltronic.com/mb/88571/0

boardsofdublin · Post by **boardsofdublin** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:18 pm

maybe this PLC thing is a new name for them on a different project, and we find out tomorow what it is...

Licolnshire Poacher · Post by **Licolnshire Poacher** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:27 pm

REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?

Anyone that does a "whois" query on this site and then on any of BOC's sites will notice different hosting companies and different contact info, as well as different countries (eg. this site is in California, all other BOC sites are in the UK).

I won't post the WhoIs info here outta respect for the law/ rules. But all this stuff from the site, including a BOC member's obvious authorship (when have they ever had their names on their site?) leads me to think that this is a nice fake.

And yet, I'm still open to the possibility that it isn't. Anyone else think this?

radiateme · Post by **radiateme** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:40 pm

Licolnshire Poacher wrote:
REDMOON wrote:Whats the relevance of that 836 site?
Anyone that does a "whois" query on this site and then on any of BOC's sites will notice different hosting companies and different contact info, as well as different countries (eg. this site is in California, all other BOC sites are in the UK).

I won't post the WhoIs info here outta respect for the law/ rules. But all this stuff from the site, including a BOC member's obvious authorship (when have they ever had their names on their site?) leads me to think that this is a nice fake.

And yet, I'm still open to the possibility that it isn't. Anyone else think this?

Now that you mentioned all of that I'm about to hop on the fake train. But still.. to pay money for hosting an ad on xltronic... that would be a little too much for a fake. Plus the music sounds pretty geuine boccish, but maybe it's just me.

Or maybe they're building a website for a friend's band named parallel lines, which they're releasing their first publically available Music70 record on 6/6/6.

Archrival · Post by **Archrival** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:41 pm

Its not BOC affiliated.

radiateme · Post by **radiateme** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:44 pm

Archrival wrote:Its not BOC affiliated.

How are you so sure? Give it up :p.

IanRedpoint · Post by **IanRedpoint** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:44 pm

dj_todos wrote:
celadon wrote:Two Questions.

1. Has anyone decided to travel to Scotland even if it is uncertain whether BOC are playing?
I have nothing planned, I have a car and I live in Manchester. If anything gets set in stone ill go.

Likewise. If anything starts looking definite then I'm prepared to drive up from London.