Xurbatronic wrote:Just two words sum the man and his work up for me:
Moby Dick
(I realise that is a book about a whale, but there is no point blubbering about it)
Sorry about the pun by the way, but I remain unswerving regarding my stance on Moby.
Also to the list of 'bewilderingly successful musical non-entities' could be:
Lady Gaga (why do people buy her records - why do radio-stations subject us to repeated torture
by playing her soulless plasti-pop?)
Tiny Tempah (Hip-Hop was invented in the 1980s, it was really good then! Now look what's
happened!)
Arctic Monkeys (When you have brilliant and original bands on Domino like Pram, why are these
guys hailed as anything other than a bad pub-rock band? Go figure....)
Oasis (we have a saying in England that you can't 'polish a turd'. Well, it didn't stop these guys
buffing away regardless of their superior mediocrity.)
Jay-Z (The only thing I can say about the performance at Glastonbury as well as everything else
he has done is "ding-dong spackaloid!")
Feel free to add some more if you are feeling as bitter as I am about not being able to make a living wage out of your own music whilst inscrutably empty piffle commands 7 figure earnings for the likes of the above mentioned!
There is literally no reason to be this bitter about a guy who writes pretty music with piano and strings. (Well..not alwaysXurbatronic wrote:Yes, I could listen to the stream directly from his website, I'm sure. I could also rub my naked eye with a bhut jolokia chilli pepper - I don't think I will though.portiss wrote:I listened to his new album, you can stream it on his website, and it's really good.
But I guess it's harder to feel smugly superior about your musical taste when you're not looking for opportunities to make pointless attacks on things other people like, especially if you haven't even bothered listening to them.

