any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.thingsthingsthings wrote:I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.
The 6-number sequence as it stands
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
- thingsthingsthings
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:17 am
- Location: los angeles
http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/DaveJ wrote:any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.thingsthingsthings wrote:I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
cheers for link man, never seen this so glad to get a peek either way!thingsthingsthings wrote:http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/DaveJ wrote:any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.thingsthingsthings wrote:I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
Sorry to go more off-topic, but i'm getting a plug-in error and cannot view the site. I installed latest Flash but no luck. Any idea what I might need? Would really like to have a look.thingsthingsthings wrote:http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/DaveJ wrote:any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.thingsthingsthings wrote:I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
EDIT: my bad, Shockwave I needed I think. Cheers!
Last edited by DaveJ on Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
It uses the old shockwave plugin, google chrome is giving me the same thing, I think it might just be too old hahaDaveJ wrote:Sorry to go more off-topic, but i'm getting a plug-in error and cannot view the site. I installed latest Flash but no luck. Any idea what I might need? Would really like to have a look.thingsthingsthings wrote:http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/DaveJ wrote: any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
- thingsthingsthings
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:17 am
- Location: los angeles
Ha shows how old it is (2002 I think). I was able to get shockwave to work, you can try it here: http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/GRIM.657 wrote:It uses the old shockwave plugin, google chrome is giving me the same thing, I think it might just be too old hahaDaveJ wrote:Sorry to go more off-topic, but i'm getting a plug-in error and cannot view the site. I installed latest Flash but no luck. Any idea what I might need? Would really like to have a look.thingsthingsthings wrote: http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
ilzmastr wrote:About a dead end when using a One Time Pad decryption approach, feel free to offer suggestions on what pads to use…or suggestions period.
I plan to implement this into a website, but I did this on my break and I have a lot of work to get back to, so I might not respond to suggestions for a while.
Hopefully this weekend, if I have time, I could figure out how to host my code on a website for everyone to fiddle around with. If you know Python/Django and can help, please mention that, I am a Python beginner.
just making sure this gets mentioned in the proper thread, though I'm sure everyone's madly checking each thread haha
- Infinite E
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:02 pm
- Contact:
yeah, i checked that yesterday too. I forgot how awesome that site is. But I wish the image was bigger. Notice for Music Is Math, the clock shown is actually the correct time. Definitely takes me back too.thingsthingsthings wrote:http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/DaveJ wrote:any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.thingsthingsthings wrote:I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
Hi everyone! I've been reading the forum for a while and just joined to talk about this...
I think that the repeating of the word "trails" during BBC show was just a way to say: if you're looking for the third clue then you're in the right place (Trails is third on the playlist). So maybe the "trails" clue has already been used, and we have to move on something else.
I think that the repeating of the word "trails" during BBC show was just a way to say: if you're looking for the third clue then you're in the right place (Trails is third on the playlist). So maybe the "trails" clue has already been used, and we have to move on something else.
I agree.gjieck wrote:Hi everyone! I've been reading the forum for a while and just joined to talk about this...
I think that the repeating of the word "trails" during BBC show was just a way to say: if you're looking for the third clue then you're in the right place (Trails is third on the playlist). So maybe the "trails" clue has already been used, and we have to move on something else.
this is great, love how you can slightly change the mix by moving around the islands.thingsthingsthings wrote:http://www.atomless.com/projects/boc/site/DaveJ wrote:any link to that man? would like to check it out anyway if its still accessible.thingsthingsthings wrote:I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.
I just checked, the trails section specifically. Didn't see anything, but I'm going to keep sifting through. Fun to navigate this site again; the island flying screens really take me back.
Great isn't it? The site version of Seven Forty Seven contains all sorts of elements not on the Warp20 release - by moving around you can really hear them.Keeoaddi wrote: this is great, love how you can slightly change the mix by moving around the islands.
I'll see you when the sun sets east, don't forget me.
https://www.instagram.com/powerline_misfortune/
https://www.instagram.com/powerline_misfortune/
yeah, i thought so, and amo bishop roden sounded quite different to me as well. makes me want to do something with multimediaTwoist wrote:Great isn't it? The site version of Seven Forty Seven contains all sorts of elements not on the Warp20 release - by moving around you can really hear them.Keeoaddi wrote: this is great, love how you can slightly change the mix by moving around the islands.
- BunnyRabbit
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:34 pm
- Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Some thoughts on the NT co-ordinates now I've had a bit of time to look at them.
So far we have four points
Two sets almost /i] form right angled triangles. But not quite. 86 and 88 degrees, or there about. You need right angles to get a regular hexagon
Together they seem to start forming an irregular hexagon, but so do any four points.
Individually they don't point to anything in the NT area that isn't on private property and collectively they don't centre on anything either.
Any four six-digit numbers will give you points on an OS map. They might not all fall onto land and they might not all fall into pattern vaguely suggestive of a hexagon though.
At best I think the co-ordinates will form a complete hexagon that is almost regular but (if that does happen) that it will be either an unintended co-incidence or only a partially intended one.
So far we have four points
Two sets almost /i] form right angled triangles. But not quite. 86 and 88 degrees, or there about. You need right angles to get a regular hexagon
Together they seem to start forming an irregular hexagon, but so do any four points.
Individually they don't point to anything in the NT area that isn't on private property and collectively they don't centre on anything either.
Any four six-digit numbers will give you points on an OS map. They might not all fall onto land and they might not all fall into pattern vaguely suggestive of a hexagon though.
At best I think the co-ordinates will form a complete hexagon that is almost regular but (if that does happen) that it will be either an unintended co-incidence or only a partially intended one.
BunnyRabbit wrote:Some thoughts on the NT co-ordinates now I've had a bit of time to look at them.
So far we have four points
Two sets almost /i] form right angled triangles. But not quite. 86 and 88 degrees, or there about. You need right angles to get a regular hexagon
Together they seem to start forming an irregular hexagon, but so do any four points.
Individually they don't point to anything in the NT area that isn't on private property and collectively they don't centre on anything either.
Any four six-digit numbers will give you points on an OS map. They might not all fall onto land and they might not all fall into pattern vaguely suggestive of a hexagon though.
At best I think the co-ordinates will form a complete hexagon that is almost regular but (if that does happen) that it will be either an unintended co-incidence or only a partially intended one.
Regardless if it is in the right geographical area, I thought it is at least an interesting way to use it as visual model to predict the two remaining numbers. It seems to me that the first model posted was done by hand plotting hence the decimals. I did it in two different ways, one using the exact corresponding height and width to other grid references. And one that compensate for the slight skewness.
With using exact height and width corresponding to the existing pointers: NT 284557 & NT 519742
With added compensation: NT 300554 & NT 501739
- Aesthetics
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5446
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:59 am
- Location: Lowlands
- Contact: