GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC

vanlorne · Post by **vanlorne** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:14 pm

Treefingers wrote:
b0qurant wrote:
vanlorne wrote:all of this is starting to hurt my brain a little
Shit's gettin' math-y
Boards of Canada with math rock elements just came into my head.

i'm am starting to go through withdrawal on these slow days

vanlorne · Post by **vanlorne** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:18 pm

Treefingers wrote:
Boards of Canada with math rock elements just came into my head.

This could be. Weren't they talking about learning toward more guitars and less electronics after TCH?

yellow-jacket · Post by **yellow-jacket** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:21 pm

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/ ... 8709_o.jpg

http://i2.ytimg.com/u/9D7VN2HldiRFdxFvC ... ground.jpg

Mexicola · Post by **Mexicola** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:27 pm

yellow-jacket wrote:https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/ ... 8709_o.jpg

http://i2.ytimg.com/u/9D7VN2HldiRFdxFvC ... ground.jpg

OK, I'll bite.... is there your own work and would you care to enlighten us further?

yellow-jacket · Post by **yellow-jacket** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:36 pm

the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.

yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.

DaveJ · Post by **DaveJ** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:37 pm

yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.

yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.

The jeep background told you that? How so?

Capt Kittinger · Post by **Capt Kittinger** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:37 pm

Have the boxes around the blank code and "One Got Fat" in Julie and Candy been mentioned? Apologies if they have, I just got up and saw it mentioned elsewhere.

yellow-jacket · Post by **yellow-jacket** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:39 pm

because i realized that the background had to do something with the description on the julie and candy video

vanlorne · Post by **vanlorne** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:40 pm

DaveJ wrote:
yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.

yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
The jeep background told you that? How so?

because of the snow I'm assuming is the implication

North by North · Post by **North by North** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:40 pm

Capt Kittinger wrote:Have the boxes around the blank code and "One Got Fat" in Julie and Candy been mentioned? Apologies if they have, I just got up and saw it mentioned elsewhere.

Si.

North by North · Post by **North by North** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:42 pm

yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.

yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.

You have the first code reversed on your picture- for a reason?

DaveJ · Post by **DaveJ** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:45 pm

vanlorne wrote:
DaveJ wrote:
yellow-jacket wrote:the background is telling us that 699742 goes into the 1st set.

yes, i made the picture. it is not officially made by the group itself. just to let you guys know.
The jeep background told you that? How so?
because of the snow I'm assuming is the implication

ah right, but that pic leaves out 1977, and I assumed "amateur footage" was a single clue, not 2.

Also if you chose that snowy pic coz people were saying their youtube account changed the background to that today, apparently it has always been that, at least for some time. If so, I don't see what that pic and the numbers have in common whatsoever.

corwood · Post by **corwood** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:45 pm

yellow-jacket wrote:https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/ ... 8709_o.jpg

http://i2.ytimg.com/u/9D7VN2HldiRFdxFvC ... ground.jpg

1977 ist left out at the beginning here...
snow comes second not in the first position
and amateur footage is one thing in my opinion
the reversed number 247997 would go to position 2

yellow-jacket · Post by **yellow-jacket** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:46 pm

well, i knew that it was reversed originally because of the 2 first numbers beside the very first number, and the rest are on the opposite side.

corwood · Post by **corwood** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:46 pm

DaveJ wrote:
vanlorne wrote:
DaveJ wrote: The jeep background told you that? How so?
because of the snow I'm assuming is the implication
ah right, but that pic leaves out 1977, and I assumed "amateur footage" was a single clue, not 2.

Also if you chose that snowy pic coz people were saying their youtube account changed the background to that today, apparently it has always been that, at least for some time. If so, I don't see what that pic and the numbers have in common whatsoever.

exactly
but it's natural that we try to combine the two elements we have right now
the pic and the code without position
makes a bit sense

isotoxal · Post by **isotoxal** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:51 pm

I think the speculation has reached the grade of utter balls. I guess nothing new will happen until more clues appear.

yellow-jacket · Post by **yellow-jacket** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:52 pm

then i'm not even sure if i'm on the right track as everyone else.

sunshine recorder · Post by **sunshine recorder** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:53 pm

5d from closes vol1. is that common knowledge?

North by North · Post by **North by North** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:59 pm

sunshine recorder wrote:
5d from closes vol1. is that common knowledge?

YES- thank you for saying this. I was thinking maybe they did it just to add to their whole mysteriousness. And maybe they like the video, or think it's funny someone labeled it 5d.

Elexen · Post by **Elexen** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:00 pm