are there any beginner/cheaper radios you'd recommend?nordheim wrote:totally, interference is everywhere in radio signals. when you think of whats going on via physics, its kind of remarkable it works as well as it does. 3 meter waves from 8000 miles away, bouncing off of the atmosphere!? huh?! yet it works. its amazing stuff. i highly recommend getting a little radio or two and listening late at night. can be spooky. a small artifact i recorded months ago to illustrate what kind of interference, static, and tuning in between frequencies can sound like: http://soundcloud.com/geometrie/inabewyreyesberchaswunkBunnyRabbit wrote:You think? Cool. I was wondering that too.nordheim wrote: they were definitely broadcast via ham or shortwave or even portable fm tuner in some manner and then re-recorded. being into shortwave for a decade and understanding some fidelity issues attributed to broadcasting leads me to this.
Is it true that interference is quite common on SW, so some of the other artefacts could be genuine stuff from the ether?
GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
hope this isnt annoying anyone, but i guess it applies to the codes/transmissions... plus were all just kind of waiting around anyway for the next clues.newscast wrote:are there any beginner/cheaper radios you'd recommend?nordheim wrote:totally, interference is everywhere in radio signals. when you think of whats going on via physics, its kind of remarkable it works as well as it does. 3 meter waves from 8000 miles away, bouncing off of the atmosphere!? huh?! yet it works. its amazing stuff. i highly recommend getting a little radio or two and listening late at night. can be spooky. a small artifact i recorded months ago to illustrate what kind of interference, static, and tuning in between frequencies can sound like: http://soundcloud.com/geometrie/inabewyreyesberchaswunkBunnyRabbit wrote: You think? Cool. I was wondering that too.
Is it true that interference is quite common on SW, so some of the other artefacts could be genuine stuff from the ether?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortwave_radio some great basic reading on the subject.
i have a distinct feeling they played their samples through an fm transmitter needed for like an ipod in a car and tuned it in from across a room on a fancier radio that could get in between the freqs. i did this for a record about 8 years ago, somewhat inspired by geogaddi's sounds but had no real evidence of that as the process.
well, the hex code translates to "anton is great
in relation to the one posted with the morse code that drsoul referenced above, and then ------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------, that people have said is a fake, the morse code on that translates to corsair, have all the corsair videos been checked? also, could the time at which that code popped up be the code? 2:15/2:51? sorry if thats been covered already, but theres 350 pages to mill over here, it;s hard keeping up!
chris
-
secret_pint
- New Seed
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:22 am
- Contact:
Yeah - mentioned this a few pages back - this is my theory too!Techboy wrote:holy balls batman! i hope you are right cause that is a good ideaOpothecary wrote:I sort of have it in the back of my head that the NPR "clue" might actually be the cipher. Maybe there will be 2 more clues? Interesting times ahead. I have a feeling that this thing will get wrapped up by the end of the weekend, one way or another so Pitchfork and company can have it out there on Monday morning for all the regular folks to see.egbdf wrote:I wonder if tonight will be the grand finale since there's only one clue left and it's a Friday so people will have time for it.
"Are you a dreamer?"
I got "Talk to poacher"...cmellan wrote:well, the hex code translates to "anton is great", so seems like a prank...
in relation to the one posted with the morse code that drsoul referenced above, and then ------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------, that people have said is a fake, the morse code on that translates to corsair, have all the corsair videos been checked? also, could the time at which that code popped up be the code? 2:15/2:51? sorry if thats been covered already, but theres 350 pages to mill over here, it;s hard keeping up!
chris
Hello!
Look what i have found:
http://gridreferencefinder.com/?gr=NT71 ... 9562|1&v=h
Now, try to connect the points: NT336699 to NT669966 to NT669933 to NT669900 to NT996666 and to NT669966 again. Then NT669900 to NT649562. How did i get this last number? Well, 1977: 1+9+7+7=24, 2+4=6. Then, Snow is 4 letters, Computing is 9, Amateur footage is 14: 1+4=5, Beards is 6 and synthesizer is 11: 1+1=2. Maybe this is too complicated, but, anyway, we can exclude this point.
Let me explain, how i've got these points:
336699 = Closest websafe color of 247996 (which is reversed 699742)
669966 = Closest websafe color of 649562
669933 = Closest websafe color of 519225 and 699742
669900 = Closest websafe color of 628315
996666 = Closest websafe color of 717228
I don't know, maybe all this does not mean anything
Look what i have found:
http://gridreferencefinder.com/?gr=NT71 ... 9562|1&v=h
Now, try to connect the points: NT336699 to NT669966 to NT669933 to NT669900 to NT996666 and to NT669966 again. Then NT669900 to NT649562. How did i get this last number? Well, 1977: 1+9+7+7=24, 2+4=6. Then, Snow is 4 letters, Computing is 9, Amateur footage is 14: 1+4=5, Beards is 6 and synthesizer is 11: 1+1=2. Maybe this is too complicated, but, anyway, we can exclude this point.
Let me explain, how i've got these points:
336699 = Closest websafe color of 247996 (which is reversed 699742)
669966 = Closest websafe color of 649562
669933 = Closest websafe color of 519225 and 699742
669900 = Closest websafe color of 628315
996666 = Closest websafe color of 717228
I don't know, maybe all this does not mean anything
- Treefingers
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:43 pm
- Location: England
- ambivalenceavenue
- Boqurant
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:24 am
- Location: London, UK
Oh wow yeah, great call! Would explain why there has been no clear intent to hint where it should be placed.Opothecary wrote:I sort of have it in the back of my head that the NPR "clue" might actually be the cipher. Maybe there will be 2 more clues? Interesting times ahead. I have a feeling that this thing will get wrapped up by the end of the weekend, one way or another so Pitchfork and company can have it out there on Monday morning for all the regular folks to see.egbdf wrote:I wonder if tonight will be the grand finale since there's only one clue left and it's a Friday so people will have time for it.
sorry, my bad - i used this converter, seems it doesn't work properly! http://www.dolcevie.com/js/converter.htmlchorus wrote:I got "Talk to poacher"...cmellan wrote:well, the hex code translates to "anton is great", so seems like a prank...
in relation to the one posted with the morse code that drsoul referenced above, and then ------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------, that people have said is a fake, the morse code on that translates to corsair, have all the corsair videos been checked? also, could the time at which that code popped up be the code? 2:15/2:51? sorry if thats been covered already, but theres 350 pages to mill over here, it;s hard keeping up!
chris
- Magrathea
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:57 am
- Location: The Great White North(east)
I think it is to prevent people figuring out the right order before the final clue comes in, helps to alleviate the risk of brute-force finding of... whateverambivalenceavenue wrote:Oh wow yeah, great call! Would explain why there has been no clear intent to hint where it should be placed.Opothecary wrote:I sort of have it in the back of my head that the NPR "clue" might actually be the cipher. Maybe there will be 2 more clues? Interesting times ahead. I have a feeling that this thing will get wrapped up by the end of the weekend, one way or another so Pitchfork and company can have it out there on Monday morning for all the regular folks to see.egbdf wrote:I wonder if tonight will be the grand finale since there's only one clue left and it's a Friday so people will have time for it.
I have a feeling that the NPR missing placement info is deliberate, either that or we missed something. I think we're due for a good matrix of all the clues, locations and theories up to date and start thinking again, yes?
I hope so !! Cause one more week would be tortureOpothecary wrote:I sort of have it in the back of my head that the NPR "clue" might actually be the cipher. Maybe there will be 2 more clues? Interesting times ahead. I have a feeling that this thing will get wrapped up by the end of the weekend, one way or another so Pitchfork and company can have it out there on Monday morning for all the regular folks to see.egbdf wrote:I wonder if tonight will be the grand finale since there's only one clue left and it's a Friday so people will have time for it.
hahahahTreefingers wrote:
how about this poacher? have you guys heard of this?chorus wrote:I got "Talk to poacher"...cmellan wrote:well, the hex code translates to "anton is great", so seems like a prank...
in relation to the one posted with the morse code that drsoul referenced above, and then ------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------, that people have said is a fake, the morse code on that translates to corsair, have all the corsair videos been checked? also, could the time at which that code popped up be the code? 2:15/2:51? sorry if thats been covered already, but theres 350 pages to mill over here, it;s hard keeping up!
chris
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincolnshi ... s_station)
- Magrathea
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:57 am
- Location: The Great White North(east)
The idea behind number stations is the the key/cipher would NEVER be part of the transmission, so that it was completely safe. So if this is related to number stations, I doubt the NPR has anything to do with being the key/cipher.ambivalenceavenue wrote:Oh wow yeah, great call! Would explain why there has been no clear intent to hint where it should be placed.Opothecary wrote:I sort of have it in the back of my head that the NPR "clue" might actually be the cipher. Maybe there will be 2 more clues? Interesting times ahead. I have a feeling that this thing will get wrapped up by the end of the weekend, one way or another so Pitchfork and company can have it out there on Monday morning for all the regular folks to see.egbdf wrote:I wonder if tonight will be the grand finale since there's only one clue left and it's a Friday so people will have time for it.
Speaking of the hex code on that page "talk to poacher", does this have any relevance?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincolnshi ... station%29
Numbers stations used to be quite common apparently, and "talk to poacher" would suggest listening to one with a name similar to this. Obviously, this could be fake...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincolnshi ... station%29
Numbers stations used to be quite common apparently, and "talk to poacher" would suggest listening to one with a name similar to this. Obviously, this could be fake...
- Little Cloud
- Friendly Stranger
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:32 pm
Hello!
Look what i have found via UK Grid Reference Finder:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/c8r7o7q
http://tinyurl.com/c8r7o7q or http://gridreferencefinder.com/?gr=NT71 ... 0|NT699742|
1,NT6690093300|NT669933|1,NT5190022500|NT519225|1,NT3360069900|NT336699|1,NT9960066600|NT996666|
1,NT7061036680|Point_s_T|0,NT6529633076|Point_s_U|0,NT6690096600|NT669966|1,NT6280031500|NT628315|
1,NT6690090000|NT669900|1,NT7126839188|Point_s_|0,NT6490056200|NT649562|1&v=h
Now, try to connect the points: NT336699 to NT669966 to NT669933 to NT669900 to NT996666 and
to NT669966 again. Then NT669900 to NT649562. How did i get this last number? Well, 1977:
1+9+7+7=24, 2+4=6. Then, Snow is 4 letters, Computing is 9, Amateur footage is 14: 1+4=5,
Beards is 6 and synthesizer is 11: 1+1=2.
Now you must see some kind of arrow pointing to the Isle of May!
Let me explain, how i've got these points:
I used colorhexa.com to find that:
336699 = Closest websafe color of 247996 (which is reversed 699742)
669966 = Closest websafe color of 649562
669933 = Closest websafe color of 519225 and 699742
669900 = Closest websafe color of 628315
996666 = Closest websafe color of 717228
Look what i have found via UK Grid Reference Finder:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/c8r7o7q
http://tinyurl.com/c8r7o7q or http://gridreferencefinder.com/?gr=NT71 ... 0|NT699742|
1,NT6690093300|NT669933|1,NT5190022500|NT519225|1,NT3360069900|NT336699|1,NT9960066600|NT996666|
1,NT7061036680|Point_s_T|0,NT6529633076|Point_s_U|0,NT6690096600|NT669966|1,NT6280031500|NT628315|
1,NT6690090000|NT669900|1,NT7126839188|Point_s_|0,NT6490056200|NT649562|1&v=h
Now, try to connect the points: NT336699 to NT669966 to NT669933 to NT669900 to NT996666 and
to NT669966 again. Then NT669900 to NT649562. How did i get this last number? Well, 1977:
1+9+7+7=24, 2+4=6. Then, Snow is 4 letters, Computing is 9, Amateur footage is 14: 1+4=5,
Beards is 6 and synthesizer is 11: 1+1=2.
Now you must see some kind of arrow pointing to the Isle of May!
Let me explain, how i've got these points:
I used colorhexa.com to find that:
336699 = Closest websafe color of 247996 (which is reversed 699742)
669966 = Closest websafe color of 649562
669933 = Closest websafe color of 519225 and 699742
669900 = Closest websafe color of 628315
996666 = Closest websafe color of 717228
Last edited by Artyomius on Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
revertedhexagon
- Eagle Minded
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:01 pm
- Location: Triangles
- depechedaz
- Boqurant
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:12 pm
- Location: kent uk
- Magrathea
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:57 am
- Location: The Great White North(east)
Bocpages is your friend!revertedhexagon wrote:Wait a second, guys where did the placement of one of the two floating numbers come from? What im asking is, where did you know where one of the numbers went?
http://bocpages.org/wiki/Record_Store_Day_incident
