GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC

Magrathea · Post by **Magrathea** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:27 am

We are NOWHERE done

Missing clue number 5 which only gives us some kind of string
Then we need to find out what to do with it

Plenty to go

plazz · Post by **plazz** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:35 am

B0Bthrob wrote:I kind of agree with this guy at watmm - "It seems weird that they would go through the trouble of setting this up in a physical space just to rebroadcast a number that's already been released."

I'd think the same, but it seems they've been adjusting their cosecha delivery plan as it goes. (ie - moving certain videos to the top of their youtube playlist to highlight last night's twoism gif clue, after realising fans were keeping close eye on the youtube playlist order)

maybe they know we're missing the location of the NPR clue and are telling us that tonight?

i thought it would all be solved tonight, but maybe we have to wait until tomorrow night, when it will all be revealed to the music of...

ParticleGhost · Post by **ParticleGhost** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:38 am

I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?

Magrathea · Post by **Magrathea** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:43 am

ParticleGhost wrote:I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?

??

BOC staged a big city stunt with projection and public outreach and revealed position for one of the essential clues.

I think "something happened"

ParticleGhost · Post by **ParticleGhost** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:49 am

Magrathea wrote:
ParticleGhost wrote:I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?
??

BOC staged a bit city stunt with projection and public outreach and revealed position for one of the essential clues.

I think "something happened"

I need to get caught up.

zeoevil · Post by **zeoevil** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:54 am

ParticleGhost wrote:
Magrathea wrote:
ParticleGhost wrote:I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?
??

BOC staged a bit city stunt with projection and public outreach and revealed position for one of the essential clues.

I think "something happened"

I need to get caught up.

Enjoy that feel. I know I did.

plazz · Post by **plazz** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:55 am

Magrathea wrote:
ParticleGhost wrote:I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?
??

BOC staged a big city stunt with projection and public outreach and revealed position for one of the essential clues.

I think "something happened"

Looking forward to hearing the behind the scenes stuff on how this cosecha trails project was pulled off. Did NPR drop the ball on not revealing a location? Did BoC change the plan as they went? Did NPR broadcast the first clue too early? How much did Aesthetics know? Is that hex converter website in on it? How long was this being planned? (since the AtalantaFugiens account was created two years ago?)

Although right now the main question seems to be: Why would you repeat the same NPR clue live in London when the location of that clue could have been derived by elimination???

Magrathea · Post by **Magrathea** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:11 am

plazz wrote:
Magrathea wrote:
ParticleGhost wrote:I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?
??

BOC staged a big city stunt with projection and public outreach and revealed position for one of the essential clues.

I think "something happened"
Looking forward to hearing the behind the scenes stuff on how this cosecha trails project was pulled off. Did NPR drop the ball on not revealing a location? Did BoC change the plan as they went? Did NPR broadcast the first clue too early? How much did Aesthetics know? Is that hex converter website in on it? How long was this being planned? (since the AtalantaFugiens account was created two years ago?)

Although right now the main question seems to be: Why would you repeat the same NPR clue live in London when the location of that clue could have been derived by elimination???

http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.p ... 372#188372

And why? because it's fun. Cat and mouse really

Elexen · Post by **Elexen** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:13 am

I would just like to point out that all the banners have 699742 in the 5th spot.... Even on the BoCpages banner. But on BoCpages when you scroll down to "Hint 4" it's placed in the first spot. And if I recall correctly it used to be starred and say that the real placement wasn't known yet. The star is gone and it's in the first spot. I know that it can be edited by anyone. Did Fredd-E do that or someone else?

Just throwin' that out there.

I'm 95% on the side of it being in the first spot and that's what the Rough Trade display was about. Placement of the NPR code.

North by North · Post by **North by North** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:40 am

Elexen wrote:I would just like to point out that all the banners have 699742 in the 5th spot.... Even on the BoCpages banner. But on BoCpages when you scroll down to "Hint 4" it's placed in the first spot. And if I recall correctly it used to be starred and say that the real placement wasn't known yet. The star is gone and it's in the first spot. I know that it can be edited by anyone. Did Fredd-E do that or someone else?

Just throwin' that out there.

I'm 95% on the side of it being in the first spot and that's what the Rough Trade display was about. Placement of the NPR code.

It was starred before..

Opothecary · Post by **Opothecary** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:47 am

Have we stopped to consider that even though the clue is the same, it could go in both the 1st and 5th spots?

saurus · Post by **saurus** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:51 am

Magrathea wrote:
ParticleGhost wrote:I was really hoping for something to happen tonight, maybe we'll get something new this weekend?
??

BOC staged a big city stunt with projection and public outreach and revealed position for one of the essential clues.

I think "something happened"

still think its fake

nordheim · Post by **nordheim** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:52 am

Opothecary wrote:Have we stopped to consider that even though the clue is the same, it could go in both the 1st and 5th spots?

indeed.

Elexen · Post by **Elexen** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:52 am

North by North wrote:
Elexen wrote:I would just like to point out that all the banners have 699742 in the 5th spot.... Even on the BoCpages banner. But on BoCpages when you scroll down to "Hint 4" it's placed in the first spot. And if I recall correctly it used to be starred and say that the real placement wasn't known yet. The star is gone and it's in the first spot. I know that it can be edited by anyone. Did Fredd-E do that or someone else?

Just throwin' that out there.

I'm 95% on the side of it being in the first spot and that's what the Rough Trade display was about. Placement of the NPR code.
It was starred before..

Yeah, that's what I said. And now it's not and it's in the first slot. Does that mean someone edited it and took out the star, to suggest that it belongs there?

Opothecary · Post by **Opothecary** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:55 am

I saw someone post this earlier:

and then researched, and found this:

http://earthriseonline.com/

North by North · Post by **North by North** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:59 am

Elexen wrote:
North by North wrote:
Elexen wrote:I would just like to point out that all the banners have 699742 in the 5th spot.... Even on the BoCpages banner. But on BoCpages when you scroll down to "Hint 4" it's placed in the first spot. And if I recall correctly it used to be starred and say that the real placement wasn't known yet. The star is gone and it's in the first spot. I know that it can be edited by anyone. Did Fredd-E do that or someone else?

Just throwin' that out there.

I'm 95% on the side of it being in the first spot and that's what the Rough Trade display was about. Placement of the NPR code.
It was starred before..
Yeah, that's what I said. And now it's not and it's in the first slot. Does that mean someone edited it and took out the star, to suggest that it belongs there?

Yes- was agreeing with you because you said if you recalled. So was confirming should you have been looking for a confirmation of yr sanity.

Elexen · Post by **Elexen** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:02 am

North by North wrote:
Elexen wrote:
North by North wrote: It was starred before..
Yeah, that's what I said. And now it's not and it's in the first slot. Does that mean someone edited it and took out the star, to suggest that it belongs there?

Yes- was agreeing with you because you said if you recalled. So was confirming should you have been looking for a confirmation of yr sanity.

Lol...Ok... Appologies. It seems I'm always looking for confirmation of sanity.

Elexen · Post by **Elexen** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:05 am

Another fake..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHt_wkY40ew

B0Bthrob · Post by **B0Bthrob** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:11 am

Horrible fake at that. I at least enjoyed the other two fakes that I listened to.

If they were fake that is...

Opothecary · Post by **Opothecary** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:14 am

From WATMM:

Through some simple wikipedia browsing I found that 36 is a triangular number (http://en.wikipedia....iangular_number). So I arranged the numbers that we have with the unknown's at the top of the triangle and went from there.

A lot easier to see patterns this way, I think. And the triangle theme would fit into the New Clear Dawn idea. Notice the triangles repeated throughout the picture (http://newcleardawn....images/ncd3.jpg).

Also, the 36th triangular number is 666. Haha...

Just throwing some ideas into the ring...

...

pair this up with the 1977 New Clear Dawn video on Youtube

are they trying to tell us that "1977" (New Clear Dawn) - the prominent use of triangles on newcleardawn.com, is the cipher?