Clip at Movement Electronic Music Festival

Keeoaddi · Post by **Keeoaddi** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:45 am

oh wow this sounds amazing, much heavier than reach for the dead

Magrathea · Post by **Magrathea** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:46 am

If that's BOC it's rather very different
not in a bad way
ok I am not listening again, June 11th cannot come fast enough! Come on, release the MP3's already!

todieisfun · Post by **todieisfun** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:46 am

rainier wrote:Did they specify whether there's a new video to go with it too? If there is I'm sure we'll see it soon enough.

from what i read, the warp logo appeared on a big screen, followed by a BoC logo and then the audio

PlacentaSand · Post by **PlacentaSand** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:48 am

Im actually kinda upset i listened to it... What a crappy way to hear a new boc tune.

maybe it wasn't them..... (probably was)

Vostok · Post by **Vostok** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:49 am

https://www.dropbox.com/s/t55e34dihs8ad ... 202013.mp3

mp3 link for people who cant play .aif's

its really bad quality but its still great

Helios · Post by **Helios** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:50 am

Damn, can someone upload to soundcloud or something, por favor?

WeHadNormality · Post by **WeHadNormality** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:51 am

Sounds like classic BoC to me. Much more like previous work than RFTD. But yeah, crappy quality recording.

SmilingHobo · Post by **SmilingHobo** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:51 am

I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.

kyriakos · Post by **kyriakos** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:52 am

mmm nice drums

Jonse · Post by **Jonse** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:54 am

SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.

It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.

I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.

But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.

PlacentaSand · Post by **PlacentaSand** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:55 am

Rodheh wrote:
SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.
It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.

I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.

But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.

Your words scare me, Rodheh

Jonse · Post by **Jonse** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:57 am

PlacentaSand wrote:
Rodheh wrote:
SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.
It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.

I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.

But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.
Your words scare me, Rodheh

Why? Because I'm not acting like this terrible recording that does no service to their music even remotely sounds amazing? I'm not saying the song sucks, I haven't heard it properly, but its depth is probably not audible on this recording.

Vostok · Post by **Vostok** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:57 am

Rodheh wrote:
SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.
It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.

I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.

But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.

define generic

PlacentaSand · Post by **PlacentaSand** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:59 am

Rodheh wrote:
PlacentaSand wrote:
Rodheh wrote: It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.

I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.

But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.
Your words scare me, Rodheh
Why? Because I'm not acting like this terrible recording that does no service to their music even remotely sounds amazing? I'm not saying the song sucks, I haven't heard it properly, but its depth is probably not audible on this recording.

Nah, i for sure agree with you. I just don't want the track to be a bad one.

Jonse · Post by **Jonse** » Mon May 27, 2013 2:59 am

Vostok wrote:
Rodheh wrote:
SmilingHobo wrote:I would recommend holding off on listening, tbh...the audio is super low quality and distorts like crazy. It hardly even gives you an idea of what the song is supposed to sound like.
It sounds like shit as far as I can tell.

I mean not just the sound quality, if there are redeeming factors to this track they are inaudible in this recording because the melody certainly isn't going anywhere and that likely means it's a track driven by intricate percussion/atmosphere details. It doesn't sound like BoC at all to me, it sounds generic.

But again, 90% of that I'm sure is simply because the recording is awful.
define generic

I mean the melody doesn't stand out and because the beats are distorted by the recording quality they effectively sound like most other electronic beats in concert bootlegs.

It probably sounds way different though and this recording isn't doing it justice.

Jonse · Post by **Jonse** » Mon May 27, 2013 3:00 am

PlacentaSand wrote:
Rodheh wrote:
PlacentaSand wrote: Your words scare me, Rodheh
Why? Because I'm not acting like this terrible recording that does no service to their music even remotely sounds amazing? I'm not saying the song sucks, I haven't heard it properly, but its depth is probably not audible on this recording.
Nah, i for sure agree with you. I just don't want the track to be a bad one.

Heh, I've yet to see BoC release a bad track. Perhaps some average ones, but never a bad one.

Helios · Post by **Helios** » Mon May 27, 2013 3:03 am

This sounds sick.

kid · Post by **kid** » Mon May 27, 2013 3:06 am

i think even with the crappy quality you can still hear that it's an awesome track.

i'm not sure how much more of this i can take.....i need this album now.

Helios · Post by **Helios** » Mon May 27, 2013 3:09 am

kid wrote:i think even with the crappy quality you can still hear that it's an awesome track.

i'm not sure how much more of this i can take.....i need this album now.

Assuming this is real (and it sounds like it is), I keep repeating it trying to imagine what the real thing sounds like.

PlatrixECV · Post by **PlatrixECV** » Mon May 27, 2013 3:11 am

If you held me at gunpoint and made me guess which track this was based upon the Quietus review I would say Sick Times.