Old Tunes and BOC Maxima cassettes for sale on ebay

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

User avatar
Melts
Boqurant
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 6:26 pm

Post by Melts »

I disagree with setting the price at "what the market will bear" at unreasonable levels just for the heck of maximizing profits. A customer should get their moneys worth, but hey lets be honest, if customers TRULY got their moneys worth there would be 0 profit. "Business is born out of sin." -unknown
"And people like The Bird Lady here, they devote a tremendous amount of their time and energy to taking care of these creatures, and shes not paid, she does all this out of her own pocket. The world needs people like that, they're special, very special." - Bob Ross
Weekend_Warrior
Boqurant
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Weekend_Warrior »

I know that she mentioned financial issues, but I still can't help but wonder if Mike somehow got inside information about a future Warp cd/digital release of this old BoC material, and that's why they feel selling these right now would be a good idea?
User avatar
BunnyRabbit
Sherbet Head
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

Post by BunnyRabbit »

Weekend_Warrior wrote:I know that she mentioned financial issues, but I still can't help but wonder if Mike somehow got inside information about a future Warp cd/digital release of this old BoC material, and that's why they feel selling these right now would be a good idea?
Yeah, probably got his old lady knocked up and bought a new house on the strength of that.... :roll:

I'm taking their reasons at face value and the timing is good due to TH hype. I'm thinking of getting round to auctioning my spare Japanese Geogaddi cd for the same reasons.

I can't believe there will be anything too soon after TH and the value of these things may not peak until after a bocset (please let that happen one day) anyway.
[/img]
User avatar
mono
Posts Quantity
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:23 am

Post by mono »

This is all very sentimental. The fact is that present-day ideology on what is desirable or worthy is not inherent to trade itself and is, in my opinion, wholly unreasonable. There are even class asymmetries to this supposed universality of uniqueness/sentimental value: nobody will give three shits about the sentimental worth of your belongings if you REALLY need to pawn them off.

If you think that when it comes to music the mode of production is unimportant, then good luck trying to make music for a living. Collectors are just a layer of leeching middlemen and in this respect their combined social effect is not different from that of the worst major label, appropriating the labour of musicians to set in motion the circulation of a commodity which will net a profit which didn't exist before. As for musical surplus production, it really is grotesque: obscure and mediocre garage bands fetching crazy prices on the collector market serve a similar purpose to Enrique Iglesias or the Hansons, but with a different strategy.
User avatar
BunnyRabbit
Sherbet Head
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

Post by BunnyRabbit »

mono wrote:This is all very sentimental. The fact is that present-day ideology on what is desirable or worthy is not inherent to trade itself and is, in my opinion, wholly unreasonable. There are even class asymmetries to this supposed universality of uniqueness/sentimental value: nobody will give three shits about the sentimental worth of your belongings if you REALLY need to pawn them off.

If you think that when it comes to music the mode of production is unimportant, then good luck trying to make music for a living. Collectors are just a layer of leeching middlemen and in this respect their combined social effect is not different from that of the worst major label, appropriating the labour of musicians to set in motion the circulation of a commodity which will net a profit which didn't exist before. As for musical surplus production, it really is grotesque: obscure and mediocre garage bands fetching crazy prices on the collector market serve a similar purpose to Enrique Iglesias or the Hansons, but with a different strategy.
What are you? Some kind of commie? :lol:
User avatar
mono
Posts Quantity
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:23 am

Post by mono »

end of thread
Last edited by mono on Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Opothecary
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1751
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by Opothecary »

mono wrote:end of thread
No way, we need something to discuss for the next 44 hours! What's the next stop on the BoC hype train? Hooper Bay leak?
User avatar
PlacentaSand
Eagle Minded
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:53 am
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by PlacentaSand »

Mike's handwriting is awesome
User avatar
PorridgeGun
Boqurant
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:59 am
Location: Scotland, Europe
Contact:

Post by PorridgeGun »

Image
User avatar
thepastinsidepressant
Sherbet Head
Posts: 957
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:39 am
Location: the past

Post by thepastinsidepressant »

i think theyre copies, all 3 tapes inc boc maxima are identical. a watmm moderator apparently has an original boc maxima. its not Memorex either, its Sony.

they look fresh considering they're from mid 90s and compare those tapes on ebay to the older scans on boc pages to see how aged the older tapes look. here also notice - not the same brand of tapes as on ebay.

do note that datathief did mention he and a producer (surprise surpise) friend did make copies and i tell you now that as i re-read that story on bocpages i'm even more confused.

copies of originals, original copies, who copied what, did they get just 1 copy of vol 1 and one of vol. 2 from boc and then made a copy each and each kept one original or made 2 copies of each ???? ffs

very hard to know whats what tbh but hey thats not to say boc mixed up the brands of tape when copying them or their recipients when.. ehem… copying them
:lol:
User avatar
LWTUA
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:29 pm

Post by LWTUA »

Of the three tapes, which would you rather have? AFOT 1??
User avatar
PlacentaSand
Eagle Minded
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:53 am
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by PlacentaSand »

LWTUA wrote:Of the three tapes, which would you rather have? AFOT 1??
Vol.2 for sure.
User avatar
re-phaelam-ed
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1106
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:58 am
Location: Canadian trapped in USA

Post by re-phaelam-ed »

interesting...remember the ol' old tunes vol 1 debate?
well seems like a few old tunes is old tunes vol 1.

in the pics...of the few old tunes auction...the cassette labels say old tunes vol.1
guess its one in the same.
User avatar
jcotteri
Eagle Minded
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:13 pm
Contact:

Post by jcotteri »

PorridgeGun wrote:Image
hahahaha I thought the same thing :D
User avatar
everythingyoudoisorange
Eagle Minded
Posts: 287
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:06 pm

Post by everythingyoudoisorange »

thepastinsidepressant wrote:i think theyre copies, all 3 tapes inc boc maxima are identical. a watmm moderator apparently has an original boc maxima. its not Memorex either, its Sony.

they look fresh considering they're from mid 90s and compare those tapes on ebay to the older scans on boc pages to see how aged the older tapes look. here also notice - not the same brand of tapes as on ebay.

do note that datathief did mention he and a producer (surprise surpise) friend did make copies and i tell you now that as i re-read that story on bocpages i'm even more confused.

copies of originals, original copies, who copied what, did they get just 1 copy of vol 1 and one of vol. 2 from boc and then made a copy each and each kept one original or made 2 copies of each ???? ffs

very hard to know whats what tbh but hey thats not to say boc mixed up the brands of tape when copying them or their recipients when.. ehem… copying them

:lol:
Yikes ! An easy way to deflate this sale would be for Mdg to just say they're not real :D

Glad I don't have the money to bid anyways

It is quite possible they used different brands though and no two tapes are the same.
User avatar
Iced Cooly Beatnik
Posts Quantity
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 9:02 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Iced Cooly Beatnik »

While I'd love to own Vol. 2 (tunes dating back to '85, whaaa?), we really should wait out the release of some kind of compilation of unreleased material. Considering MHTRTC was almost a compilation of things they'd been working on in the past, it doesn't seem like too unrealistic an idea for this to be made. I trust mdg with every bit of light he's shed on the subject thus far (who should be popping up with a comment about this sale in the next day or two).
Be music friends: http://last.fm/user/will-neill
Be friends with my music: http://willneill.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
jcotteri
Eagle Minded
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:13 pm
Contact:

Post by jcotteri »

thepastinsidepressant wrote:i think theyre copies, all 3 tapes inc boc maxima are identical. a watmm moderator apparently has an original boc maxima. its not Memorex either, its Sony.

they look fresh considering they're from mid 90s and compare those tapes on ebay to the older scans on boc pages to see how aged the older tapes look. here also notice - not the same brand of tapes as on ebay.

do note that datathief did mention he and a producer (surprise surpise) friend did make copies and i tell you now that as i re-read that story on bocpages i'm even more confused.

copies of originals, original copies, who copied what, did they get just 1 copy of vol 1 and one of vol. 2 from boc and then made a copy each and each kept one original or made 2 copies of each ???? ffs

very hard to know whats what tbh but hey thats not to say boc mixed up the brands of tape when copying them or their recipients when.. ehem… copying them
:lol:
:roll: If you think they used one particular tape brand or copied them all at once, would be somewhat absurd. I think they just made copies willy nilly when ever an opportunity presented itself, like sending a demo off or a present for a hexagon sun member, friend or what ever speculative reason. So they no doubt used what ever tapes were on hand at the time.. Unless you can show multiple occasions of the same tape being used, then go ahead.
User avatar
apriorion
Posts Quantity
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:50 pm

Post by apriorion »

I'm curious to read mdg's response on the matter. To be honest, her excuse for selling the tapes sounds flimsy to me, and the timing seems crass. Kinda insulting to BOC fans, really, the shamelessness of it all. Yet, the Paradinases will probably not be disappointed by their results: I wish that they don't get more than $500 worth for it (since no tape should sell for more than that, anyway--it's a fucking injustice to the world when they do), but let's be realistic--someone will pay up.
User avatar
seanandcandy
Sherbet Head
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:34 pm
Location: Australia

Post by seanandcandy »

apriorion wrote:To be honest, her excuse for selling the tapes sounds flimsy to me
since when did you need justification to sell your own property?
*farts*

idk
User avatar
jcotteri
Eagle Minded
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:13 pm
Contact:

Post by jcotteri »

I'm sorry but I fail to see why a tape should sell for less than any other hard format? Unless you are judging the price on artwork realestate? Which would be absurd. For some like myself, cassettes hold a special place in my heart as my first albums were purchased on Tape not CD nor vinyl.. I'm not sure about yourself though.

I do now hold a special penchant for vinyl though and love this format possibly more than cassette.
Post a reply