Fact Magazine - One very important thought: MHTRTC at 15

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

Post a reply
User avatar
Psilcosyn
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Rome
Contact:

Post by Psilcosyn »

Good read
User avatar
softfokus
Posts Quantity
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 3:37 am
Location: Austin TX

Post by softfokus »

it's a good read, but i also disagree with a lot of the opinions expressed in this article.

specifically, i take issue with using the term "twee" in regards to anything boards of canada has done musically.
User avatar
Dorrrian
New Seed
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:12 pm
Contact:

Post by Dorrrian »

softfokus wrote: i take issue with using the term "twee" in regards to anything boards of canada has done musically.
Yeah. I love this passage from Nico Muhly:

-Now, I have major objections to the word “precious.” It tends to be borderline homophobic in its coded usage, first of all, but second of all, it’s a derogatory adjective with no alternative. It’s reviewspeak. What I mean is: if you say, “that’s ugly” somebody else can say, “no, it’s beautiful.” If you say, “it’s over-stuffed” somebody can say, “really, I thought it was pretty thin.” So the problem with a word like precious is that the scale of adjectives with “precious” on it belongs solely to the reviewer and is just a way of being mean. Case in point: this whole nonsense about Sufjan Stevens’s's BQE Thing. Words like fey, twee, and precious have become these little nuggets of coded disdain, but they are really just useless self-congratulatory gestures on the part of the reviewer. What is the opposite of twee? Muscular? It all reminds me of the insane misogynist critiques of Jane Austen’s novels.
breadmaker
Posts Quantity
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:23 am
Location: canada

Post by breadmaker »

Dorrrian wrote:
softfokus wrote: i take issue with using the term "twee" in regards to anything boards of canada has done musically.
Yeah. I love this passage from Nico Muhly:

-Now, I have major objections to the word “precious.” It tends to be borderline homophobic in its coded usage, first of all, but second of all, it’s a derogatory adjective with no alternative. It’s reviewspeak. What I mean is: if you say, “that’s ugly” somebody else can say, “no, it’s beautiful.” If you say, “it’s over-stuffed” somebody can say, “really, I thought it was pretty thin.” So the problem with a word like precious is that the scale of adjectives with “precious” on it belongs solely to the reviewer and is just a way of being mean. Case in point: this whole nonsense about Sufjan Stevens’s's BQE Thing. Words like fey, twee, and precious have become these little nuggets of coded disdain, but they are really just useless self-congratulatory gestures on the part of the reviewer. What is the opposite of twee? Muscular? It all reminds me of the insane misogynist critiques of Jane Austen’s novels.
oh nico muhly! you're pretty great.

Dorrrian is your avatar Al Parker?
User avatar
Dorrrian
New Seed
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:12 pm
Contact:

Post by Dorrrian »

breadmaker wrote:Dorrrian is your avatar Al Parker?
Yeah :D
Post a reply