In keeping with the theme of surveillance and ominous sound of Boards of Canada's latest album, and with their negative stance toward the Internet and governmental intrusion (for example, their sympathy toward victims of the Waco incident), take a look at this image and accompanying article just published by the Guardian. Apparently, the NSA has been secretly wire-tapping--harvesting--every single communication between American users of the Verizon telecom company, Microsoft, Apple, and Google, as well as other controllers of media communications, for five years, and is continuing to do so. Enough said, I'll let you draw your own conclusions:
In my opinion, this is harrowing. Even if someone has nothing to hide, it's still an invasion of their privacy. The lack of general outrage toward this matter is unsettling.
What is your stance on this, Twoismers? Do you think this ties in directly with BOC's views?
Last edited by saturdayindex on Fri Jun 07, 2013 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It's horrendous, obviously, but I'm not sure why it's seen as a shock revelation. I'd be surprised if it hadn't being going on a lot longer.
There are plenty stories about phone users back in the eighties in the UK being able to hear a little click on the line if certain words were used - a sign that the spooks were tuning in.
A_Northern_Soul wrote:It's horrendous, obviously, but I'm not sure why it's seen as a shock revelation. I'd be surprised if it hadn't being going on a lot longer.
There are plenty stories about phone users back in the eighties in the UK being able to hear a little click on the line if certain words were used - a sign that the spooks were tuning in.
*checks out window for black Omegas*
You're right, it may not be incredibly surprising, but i found the symbolism of the PRISM campaign (with the hexagons and all!) and the whole deal to be somewhat in line with the new album and some of their general ideas.
saturdayindex wrote:In my opinion, this is harrowing. Even if someone has nothing to hide, it's still an invasion of their privacy. The lack of general outrage toward this matter is unsettling.
I can't understand the sort of thinking of "if you've got nothing to hide, why worry?", when it's a clear case of people who are supposed to work for the people coldly asserting power over them (and doing more damage than good, in the process). It's terrifying how that sort of view is becoming more widespread and accepted amongst ordinary people: Theresa May over here considering scrapping the Human Rights act was welcomed by some, simply because criminals have them; the increasingly disturbing growth of fascist opinions...
How does any mind with a level of basic rationality and compassion reach the conclusion that the best way to combat terrorism is to terrorise ordinary people?
When Hitler was standing on that balcony yelling about god knows what, I can only bet a large number of Jews said "Let him have his say, we've got nothing to hide". Eventually they had to hide THEMSELVES. You don't have to hide anything NOW as being a certain type of person is not a criminal act YET.
What if, say, hypothetically, (so this is an example) listening to Boards of Canada becomes severely frowned upon over the next 5 years. That's not going to stop me listening to it, its only going to make me hide my activity for doing so, and bam, suddenly I have something to hide, and suddenly its quite impossible to hide anything anymore as the FBI, the CIA, the GIABD, the NPLOPD, the KAFKA, the ZFFTD3.3.11, the ORPPPEEGAGGEFYKLAAMNSSD and every fucking organisation with a bit of money will be peer into my computer activity. Defend your constitutional protected rights! No one else will do it for you!
Cupz wrote:When Hitler was standing on that balcony yelling about god knows what, I can only bet a large number of Jews said "Let him have his say, we've got nothing to hide". Eventually they had to hide THEMSELVES. You don't have to hide anything NOW as being a certain type of person is not a criminal act YET.
What if, say, hypothetically, (so this is an example) listening to Boards of Canada becomes severely frowned upon over the next 5 years. That's not going to stop me listening to it, its only going to make me hide my activity for doing so, and bam, suddenly I have something to hide, and suddenly its quite impossible to hide anything anymore as the FBI, the CIA, the GIABD, the NPLOPD, the KAFKA, the ZFFTD3.3.11, the ORPPPEEGAGGEFYKLAAMNSSD and every fucking organisation with a bit of money will be peer into my computer activity. Defend your constitutional protected rights! No one else will do it for you!
Cupz wrote:When Hitler was standing on that balcony yelling about god knows what, I can only bet a large number of Jews said "Let him have his say, we've got nothing to hide". Eventually they had to hide THEMSELVES. You don't have to hide anything NOW as being a certain type of person is not a criminal act YET.
What if, say, hypothetically, (so this is an example) listening to Boards of Canada becomes severely frowned upon over the next 5 years. That's not going to stop me listening to it, its only going to make me hide my activity for doing so, and bam, suddenly I have something to hide, and suddenly its quite impossible to hide anything anymore as the FBI, the CIA, the GIABD, the NPLOPD, the KAFKA, the ZFFTD3.3.11, the ORPPPEEGAGGEFYKLAAMNSSD and every fucking organisation with a bit of money will be peer into my computer activity. Defend your constitutional protected rights! No one else will do it for you!
Well said Cupz.
Agreed.
From the Guardian article:
Microsoft -- which is currently running an advertising campaign with the slogan "Your privacy is our priority" -- was the first [to connect with PRISM], with collection beginning in December 2007.
I'm not super surprised, not at all actually, especially considering this is being done under the Patriot Act and FISA.
However, it has prompted me to consider making the switch to TOR browsing (pianoforte, that list was also helpful)
Check out this piece in the The Guardian. The concept of '3 hops' is an interesting one. The Guardian have perhaps been slightly liberal with their maths,but just based on Facebook contacts alone, that would be somewhere around 6 MILLION people that the NSA consider fair game - purely if they consider little old me the potential 'issue'.