NEUROMUTE wrote:ABCDecide wrote:NEUROMUTE wrote:Cupz wrote:Basefree wrote:I don't know..
Stretched in Irfanview from 200x200 to 450x450
vs.
"HD"
The funny thing is, that artwork isn't exactly that complicated.
You could just remake that artwork in vector in about the time you would spend adding those photoshop filters and have it like 10000000000000000x10000000000000000 if you'd like.
In fact...I'll do that tonight.
That would be cool. But the file size wouldn't be...
Unless you have a supercomputer. Then it's okay.
If you use a vector image, the filesize is miniscule and you can make it however large you like.
Yes, a vector maintains a relatively small file size, however, a complete rendering/export of a file with that resolution would be nearly uncontainable. Dependent, of course, on other varying circumstances.
If it's an optimised PNG of, for example, the Catalog 3 cover art, it would still be quite small.
