who are these kids, anyway?

akrotiri · Post by **akrotiri** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:13 pm

Here I have attached the cover and sleeves to Geogaddi.
Now, we must find out: who these kids are.
[clarification for the anti-humorous: i dont mean find the kids. that was a sarcastic sort of statement. i am interested in the source films]

polarbear · Post by **polarbear** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:26 pm

interesting..

polarbear · Post by **polarbear** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:35 pm

geogaddi art

polarbear · Post by **polarbear** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:44 pm

would be really great to find originals of these artworks!

re-phaelam-ed · Post by **re-phaelam-ed** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:37 pm

akrotiri wrote:Here I have attached the cover and sleeves to Geogaddi.
Now, we must find out: who these kids are.

why?

akrotiri · Post by **akrotiri** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:38 pm

re-phaelam-ed wrote:
akrotiri wrote:Here I have attached the cover and sleeves to Geogaddi.
Now, we must find out: who these kids are.
why?

why not?

re-phaelam-ed · Post by **re-phaelam-ed** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:45 pm

akrotiri wrote:
re-phaelam-ed wrote:
akrotiri wrote:Here I have attached the cover and sleeves to Geogaddi.
Now, we must find out: who these kids are.
why?
why not?

who fucking cares...you some kinda pedophile or something?
does everything have to be defined. cant you just accept it for what it is.....album art?
do you have an imagination? make your own story.

so you find out who they are...then what? can you go on without knowing? or will you not be able to function anymore.

akrotiri · Post by **akrotiri** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:51 pm

re-phaelam-ed wrote:
akrotiri wrote:
re-phaelam-ed wrote: why?
why not?
who fucking cares...you some kinda pedophile or something?
does everything have to be defined. cant you just accept it for what it is.....album art?
do you have an imagination? make your own story.

so you find out who they are...then what? can you go on without knowing? or will you not be able to function anymore.

i think you're taking this a bit too seriously

is it really appropriate to even conjure the idea of pedophilia? come on man.
i'm just curious to see the original films of these pictures is all. that's not too bad. im not meaning literally go out and find the kids.

re-phaelam-ed · Post by **re-phaelam-ed** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:57 pm

akrotiri wrote:
re-phaelam-ed wrote:
akrotiri wrote: why not?
who fucking cares...you some kinda pedophile or something?
does everything have to be defined. cant you just accept it for what it is.....album art?
do you have an imagination? make your own story.

so you find out who they are...then what? can you go on without knowing? or will you not be able to function anymore.
i think you're taking this a bit too seriously

i think some want to know too much and ask the creepiest questions.
shit like this takes the fun out of it....taking things into the realm of the psycho fan.

akrotiri · Post by **akrotiri** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:58 pm

re-phaelam-ed wrote:
akrotiri wrote:
re-phaelam-ed wrote: who fucking cares...you some kinda pedophile or something?
does everything have to be defined. cant you just accept it for what it is.....album art?
do you have an imagination? make your own story.

so you find out who they are...then what? can you go on without knowing? or will you not be able to function anymore.
i think you're taking this a bit too seriously
i think some want to know too much and ask the creepiest questions.
shit like this takes the fun out of it....taking things into the realm of the psycho fan.

i recommend you read my edit to my post above

northernlite · Post by **northernlite** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:58 pm

they are probably family/friends/kids of friends

akrotiri · Post by **akrotiri** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:04 pm

northernlite wrote:they are probably family/friends/kids of friends

all photography by the brothers, the credits say. hmm.

GRIM.657 · Post by **GRIM.657** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:55 pm

akrotiri wrote:
northernlite wrote:they are probably family/friends/kids of friends
all photography by the brothers, the credits say. hmm.

Yep, this. Also apparently dealer's boc maxima was originally from someone featured in the geogaddi artwork: http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5756

polarbear · Post by **polarbear** » Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:38 pm

northernlite wrote:they are probably family/friends/kids of friends

most probably

thepastinsidepressant · Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:55 pm

meh, these are more than likely random old slides they found in a car boot, nobody will ever know.
same with campfire, all random. go to ebay, theres loads of this stuff for sale. it's what artists, designers, illustrators have done for years, they source things from all over the place no matter how obscure and change it to fit the purpose.

don't go looking too much into it.

egbdf · Post by **egbdf** » Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:01 am

re-phaelam-ed wrote:
akrotiri wrote:
re-phaelam-ed wrote: why?
why not?
who fucking cares...you some kinda pedophile or something?
does everything have to be defined. cant you just accept it for what it is.....album art?
do you have an imagination? make your own story.

so you find out who they are...then what? can you go on without knowing? or will you not be able to function anymore.

It would be creepy if this guy wanted personal information about these kids (who are now probably adults, by the way. Did you think of that?). But curiosity about why they were chosen or whether they are taken from a movie or something, while indicative of extreme fandom, is pretty harmless.

Why would you immediately think it's sexual?

GH · Post by GH » Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:27 am

Man. I'm not even gonna say anything, aside from saying I notice another irregularity in the consistency captain.

To the OP, read through Grim's post and it becomes apparent that at least one of the girls knows the guys. That would make it possible that some of the others do too, which would put me off looking for source films etc. But who knows.

Opothecary · Post by **Opothecary** » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:40 am

I'm sure these are old photos from when they were kids. Pretty easy to surmise based on them taking credit for the photos, and just based on the quality of the photos/hairstyles/etc that they're probably childhood friends or family. A little creepy and probably best to leave it alone.

Lens Larque · Post by **Lens Larque** » Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:10 am

This whole thing is weird!

On the real!

polarbear · Post by **polarbear** » Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:36 am

Opothecary wrote:I'm sure these are old photos from when they were kids. Pretty easy to surmise based on them taking credit for the photos, and just based on the quality of the photos/hairstyles/etc that they're probably childhood friends or family. A little creepy and probably best to leave it alone.

not leave this alone, investigate, please!

____twoism

who are these kids, anyway?

who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?

Re: who are these kids, anyway?