I'm not sure that's accurate, the font weight is quite considerably darker, not within the range of the resolution of that photo.
As for the one from dropbox, that's weird ass, that's like a third version, the font is completely different. the font is clearly helvetica in the book type cover. You can see it more clearly here: http://s51.radikal.ru/i133/1007/c8/5eb0c8747d8d.jpg and you can DEFINITELY see it more clearly in the file which I was sent:
It even has the glossy effect and staple marks you would get from scanning a CD cover.
However I just don't believe the track I was sent is genuine so I am wondering the source of this image. is it just a really good shoop?
Techboy wrote:I'm not sure that's accurate, the font weight is quite considerably darker, not within the range of the resolution of that photo.
As for the one from dropbox, that's weird ass, that's like a third version, the font is completely different. the font is clearly helvetica in the book type cover. You can see it more clearly here: http://s51.radikal.ru/i133/1007/c8/5eb0c8747d8d.jpg and you can DEFINITELY see it more clearly in the file which I was sent:
It even has the glossy effect and staple marks you would get from scanning a CD cover.
However I just don't believe the track I was sent is genuine so I am wondering the source of this image. is it just a really good shoop?
That's impressive. Maybe you should upload the track? I've never seen artwork that HQ of PBN.
EDIT: Analyzing a bit of the photographic data seems that this wasn't shopped, or, at least, saved from Photoshop. Please do upload the track, even if it's unconvincing.
"What 'M' is a garden flower, whose bright orange petals-" "Yes, Sarah?" "Football." "That's it!"
Techboy wrote:I'm not sure that's accurate, the font weight is quite considerably darker, not within the range of the resolution of that photo.
As for the one from dropbox, that's weird ass, that's like a third version, the font is completely different. the font is clearly helvetica in the book type cover. You can see it more clearly here: http://s51.radikal.ru/i133/1007/c8/5eb0c8747d8d.jpg and you can DEFINITELY see it more clearly in the file which I was sent:
It even has the glossy effect and staple marks you would get from scanning a CD cover.
However I just don't believe the track I was sent is genuine so I am wondering the source of this image. is it just a really good shoop?
That's impressive. Maybe you should upload the track? I've never seen artwork that HQ of PBN.
EDIT: Analyzing a bit of the photographic data seems that this wasn't shopped, or, at least, saved from Photoshop. Please do upload the track, even if it's unconvincing.
there are a few things wrong with this track and i don't want to give them all away incase they get "fixed" in time for a second "leak".
my main example is audio dropouts existing in the guitar track where they exist on r35tt, and the echo at the end isn't quite as i would expect for what this is.
but mostly it's just the quality of the track. it isn't "right", it isn't "boc".
i am pretty sure i have the identity of the leaker, also, who has a membership on this forum - I have PM'ed him.
for that reason, i will be waiting to hear from them before a leak happens. they can post it themselves and explain how they made it.
Techboy wrote:there are a few things wrong with this track and i don't want to give them all away incase they get "fixed" in time for a second "leak".
my main example is audio dropouts existing in the guitar track where they exist on r35tt, and the echo at the end isn't quite as i would expect for what this is.
but mostly it's just the quality of the track. it isn't "right", it isn't "boc".
i am pretty sure i have the identity of the leaker, also, who has a membership on this forum - I have PM'ed him.
for that reason, i will be waiting to hear from them before a leak happens. they can post it themselves and explain how they made it.
I honestly don't know what to make of this. That artwork is wonderful, and seems legit. The track sounds odd, but honestly, it almost sounds legitimate. THis person send you anything else?
"What 'M' is a garden flower, whose bright orange petals-" "Yes, Sarah?" "Football." "That's it!"
Techboy wrote:Also worth noting it was posted from PA in the US, which is not what I would expect (UK).
Disregarding that fact, is there anything you find that could make this legitimate, aside from the CD cover? I know you say there are audio flaws that you'd like to keep hidden until the full leak, but is there anything "for" this by means of authenticity?
"What 'M' is a garden flower, whose bright orange petals-" "Yes, Sarah?" "Football." "That's it!"
Techboy wrote:Also worth noting it was posted from PA in the US, which is not what I would expect (UK).
Disregarding that fact, is there anything you find that could make this legitimate, aside from the CD cover? I know you say there are audio flaws that you'd like to keep hidden until the full leak, but is there anything "for" this by means of authenticity?
just the cover, really, although it could be a decent shop. it's an easy font to identify and the staples and glossy paper would take not long to do with a printer/re-scan.
and also the guitar quality is higher than i think has existed before. but ive been in contact with someone who may be able to prove me wrong on that and i'll be up to date soon i hope
Techboy wrote:Also worth noting it was posted from PA in the US, which is not what I would expect (UK).
Disregarding that fact, is there anything you find that could make this legitimate, aside from the CD cover? I know you say there are audio flaws that you'd like to keep hidden until the full leak, but is there anything "for" this by means of authenticity?
just the cover, really, although it could be a decent shop. it's an easy font to identify and the staples and glossy paper would take not long to do with a printer/re-scan.
and also the guitar quality is higher than i think has existed before. but ive been in contact with someone who may be able to prove me wrong on that and i'll be up to date soon i hope
Cool, cool. Please keep us updated!
"What 'M' is a garden flower, whose bright orange petals-" "Yes, Sarah?" "Football." "That's it!"
I can't go through another fake like the Whitney Houston Remix or any of the countless others. My hope is stretching thin, and I grow increasingly suspicious with each "leak"
no. i received this one file only - numerator - from PA on 24th nov, 2am gmt and firmly believe it is fake. I came here asking where the guy got the HQ artwork, that's all
He can post the track himself when he decides to come out from under his little anonymity cloak.
edit: to clarify i just dont think he should be given the desired effect of having me post it here and then have the community go crazy over it as if it is definitely 100% real. the reason i take uploads on rareboc is because i am pretty well versed in the fakes which are out there and would tend to know when something BS comes in.
∴
