Jacquard Causeway structural thumbprint

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

User avatar
JESUSANDHOES
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:44 am
Location: Madison, WI, USA

Post by JESUSANDHOES »

Radiobuzz wrote:Here's another great way to represent time:

Image
What does the fact that you can also visualize music on a lined sheet of paper with a particular notation have to do with what I'm talking about in this thread?

Your argument seems to be: (And if the below isn't your argument, correct me -- my intention is not to make you the "straw man")

P1. JESUSANDHOES sees something a certain way
P2. The same thing can be seen a different way
C. Therefore, that way JESUSANDHOES sees it isn't the only way

This argument is sound but trivial. Yes, a thing can be looked at multiple ways. That's why I brought it up - to hear what others thought of my way of seeing this. Unfortunately I don't think your opinion thus far has been very interesting or helpful. If you could maybe demonstrate why I'm wrong to point out the patterns I pointed out, that would be a start. Instead you just post a half-baked insult!

Peace
User avatar
Radiobuzz
Eagle Minded
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am
Location: On a beach in Argentina

Post by Radiobuzz »

Because you're not technically wrong in the same way a kid can grab a a play doh and make a figure with it and be perfectly valid. You're grabbing A, B and C and you draw a beautiful figure within it, it's not for me to question the figure you make, but to pass it as something planned by the makers to be seen that way is just a tad misleading.
---
Fuck transphobes
User avatar
JESUSANDHOES
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:44 am
Location: Madison, WI, USA

Post by JESUSANDHOES »

Radiobuzz wrote:Because you're not technically wrong in the same way a kid can grab a a play doh and make a figure with it and be perfectly valid. You're grabbing A, B and C and you draw a beautiful figure within it, it's not for me to question the figure you make, but to pass it as something planned by the makers to be seen that way is just a tad misleading.
When you have 18 minutes, watch this video:

http://youtu.be/-RXNtK0kULI (the beginning got cut off, but you don't miss anything. There's also a glitch around 3:38; you just miss 3 seconds)

I re-did all my measurements tonight in a DAW and recorded a screencast while walking through the results. And I actually confirmed my results and discovered more!

I will say that I can appreciate where you're coming from, though, Radiobuzz. As mentioned elsewhere, I was still in the process of figuring out new things as I wrote my first couple posts, so I went back and added a note to the top my original post.

Regardless, I think this video has at least 7 or 8 pieces of evidence pointing towards a pattern with some amount of intention.

39, 234, 3, 6.

Why would 39 recur in a song? 39 divides the length of the song into 6.

The 0.4519 extra bars of silence also fit in perfectly, a little bit on both ends. And I think it's reasonable to say that the shape also fits eerily well. A shape made of 39 sixes, with a sum of unique shape-factors of 70, three axes of symmetry like a revolving 3/4 beat, 6 sides.

There's really so much more to the song that is human, and inexplicable. But I think coincidences of this nature have the mark of a masterfully executed work. My point doesn't have to mean anything more than what it is - but it fits.

Allright, time for pizza. :D
edit: mentioned 3-second glitch in video
Post a reply