Tomorrow's Harvest - How do you rate it now?

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

How do you rate Tomorrow's Harvest?

10 - This album exceeds even my wildest dreams. Pure lifechanging bliss.
22
15%
9 - Absolutely incredible. It's everything I wanted it to be but still not as good as <insert your favourite album here>.
36
24%
8 - Superb! I loved every bit of it. Unlike their early work, but still amazing nonetheless.
34
23%
7 - A solid release by our favourite Scottish duo.
36
24%
6 - Enjoyable, but dragged a little in the middle.
7
5%
5 - Average. Can't decide if I like it or not? I have splinters in my **** from sitting on this fence basically.
5
3%
4 - I enjoyed it, but I'm hipster scum with a beard and I'd never admit to enjoying anything that isn't recorded by an obscure Nigerian in 1972.
1
1%
3 - Genuinely didn't think it was all that great. I still love BoC and it had its moments, but I was honestly disappointed.
6
4%
2 - Did we really have to wait 8 years for this? If only they put in more effort in the actual music instead of the viral campaign.
1
1%
1 - If it weren't by BoC I wouldn't even listen to it.
1
1%
0 - Absolutely rubbish. Does not live up to the hype at all. I'd rather listen to Justin Bieber.
1
1%
 
Total votes: 150

User avatar
Fredd-E
Drone Operator
Posts: 4662
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 12:39 am
Contact:

Tomorrow's Harvest - How do you rate it now?

Post by Fredd-E »

It's been a year since its release. How do you rate Tomorrow's Harvest?

Thanks Mexicola for helping me with the descriptions. ;)

Please also vote @ http://bocpages.org/wiki/bocpages:Polls
bkillsb
Posts Quantity
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 6:25 am

Post by bkillsb »

Clever bunch you lot are. Took the polls earlier :D
User avatar
Mexicola
Telepath
Posts: 8882
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 9:36 pm
Location: Dorset, UK

Post by Mexicola »

I was especially proud of no.4 :wink:

Welcome Fredd-e. Always happy to help out.
Image

Slow down...
bkillsb
Posts Quantity
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 6:25 am

Post by bkillsb »

HAHAHA!! OMG that's brilliant Mexi...doesn't sound familiar AT ALL! :-P
User avatar
Mexicola
Telepath
Posts: 8882
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 9:36 pm
Location: Dorset, UK

Post by Mexicola »

bkillsb wrote:HAHAHA!! OMG that's brilliant Mexi...doesn't sound familiar AT ALL! :-P
:wink:
Image

Slow down...
User avatar
Jonse
Happy Cycler
Posts: 3521
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:19 am
Location: BPR. OG
Contact:

Post by Jonse »

"I enjoyed it, but I'm hipster scum with a beard and I'd never admit to enjoying anything that isn't recorded by an obscure Nigerian in 1972."

Biased poll is biased. :lol:

3 is more accurate description wise but I honestly would give TH an average rating - totally average, about a dead 5. It's just that the description is off there as well, so I guess I won't vote.

My score is 5 - Disappointed. Has some moments that feel like legit BoC, has some high spots, would have worked much better as an EP with less filler (which is the version I actually listen to for the most part), "palindrome" gimmick doesn't do it for me. Much less layering, absence of the same sort of textural love we got with the previous albums, and finally very cold - which is not an inherently negative thing. It's that they didn't utilize the cold feeling in a way that I thought benefited the album. They seemed to try and make it in the same old "warm" way but with that sound. They got to doing that part right with Uritual, they almost did it with Split Your Infinities, but it falls short just about everywhere else.

New Seeds is still by miles my favorite track on the album. Personally, I preferred it modified with a little bit of stereo widening and EQ'ing it differently (to circumvent the thing I was talking about) but although repetitive, it's a track reminiscent of TCH that definitely says BoC. Unlike some of the moments such as Cold Earth where it comes off like a BoC-alike, that track has it where it counts, and I have listened to it quite a bit.

I just can't help but feel if it were about half the length, mastered a bit differently and slightly less repetitive, I could give this a solid 6.5 or so like Trans Canada Highway. I think if they'd retained the signals and whatnot that we heard in the promotional stuff, the tone of the album would be much better. I think the promo version of Seeds of the Dead is a lot better as it adds texture that was otherwise missing to it. All in all though, while it's undoubtedly the worst official release yet for me, it's not some sort of tragedy by any means and it's pointless to get too upset about it. Its existence doesn't ruin Geogaddi or something. Still, it's very disappointing, not as much as it might be for those who literally waited 8 years in the sense that all they did was keep checking BoC's website (I've never understood all of the "UUUUGHHHHHHHH COME OUT ALREADY...just go on with your life until it's over), but disappointing nonetheless because it's a 5/10 record from a 9/10 band. The band that released Geogaddi. The band that released MHTRTC. The band that released Hi Scores. Etc.

It wasn't an atrocity, an "I fucking hate this band now and can't believe they did that" by any means, like Random Access Memories by Daft Punk which deserves probably a -1 out of 10. As such, I'm still looking forward to what BoC might be up to in the future and hopefully it'll be at least as good or better than TCH this time, which is what about nine billion people were saying about TH before it came out. Tomorrow's Harvest was just very average and the whole experience was just one long hype train fueled by the third rate Year Zero clone ARG that was supposed to take us to Six Flags but dropped us off at a traveling carnival - probably the best analogy I can make. It was one of the big disappointments for me in 2013, a year that was probably the worst for music in my entire life, just barely redeemed in the fall.

That's all, and that's just my opinion on it. Of course if you're one of those people who are offended by the fact that I have that opinion, that probably doesn't matter to you.
Last edited by Jonse on Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
User avatar
Mexicola
Telepath
Posts: 8882
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 9:36 pm
Location: Dorset, UK

Post by Mexicola »

Rodheh wrote:"I enjoyed it, but I'm hipster scum with a beard and I'd never admit to enjoying anything that isn't recorded by an obscure Nigerian in 1972."

Biased poll is biased. :lol:
:lol: I aim to please.

Incidentally, for the record, I have a beard and have music by an obscure Nigerian, although it was more 1978 I think :wink:
Image

Slow down...
User avatar
Jonse
Happy Cycler
Posts: 3521
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:19 am
Location: BPR. OG
Contact:

Post by Jonse »

Mexicola wrote:
Rodheh wrote:"I enjoyed it, but I'm hipster scum with a beard and I'd never admit to enjoying anything that isn't recorded by an obscure Nigerian in 1972."

Biased poll is biased. :lol:
:lol: I aim to please.

Incidentally, for the record, I have a beard and have music by an obscure Nigerian, although it was more 1978 I think :wink:
Boards of Nigeria?
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
User avatar
Mexicola
Telepath
Posts: 8882
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 9:36 pm
Location: Dorset, UK

Post by Mexicola »

Image

Slow down...
User avatar
Jonse
Happy Cycler
Posts: 3521
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:19 am
Location: BPR. OG
Contact:

Post by Jonse »

Mexicola wrote:Enjoy
YOU NEED TO HEAR THIS


Do I?
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
User avatar
Mexicola
Telepath
Posts: 8882
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 9:36 pm
Location: Dorset, UK

Post by Mexicola »

Oh yes, although I'm hijacking the thread here. Continue over here I reckon :wink:
Image

Slow down...
User avatar
mechanismj
Nova Scotia Robot
Posts: 5153
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:35 am
Contact:

Post by mechanismj »

I give it an 8 to 9. I admittedly pick and choose certain tracks to listen to. Palace Posy, Nothing Is Real, Split Your Infinities, Sick Times, Cold Earth, Come To Dust and Reach For The Dead are up there with my absolute favorites.

Also sporting a beard.

Beards Of Canada.
User avatar
Betacord
Eagle Minded
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:34 am
Location: UK

Post by Betacord »

8 - a superb album - but also totally agree with the summary / description of 7.
User avatar
arvy
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by arvy »

This was my biggest music albums ever, really gave me a push to explore more music and not just BOC music, so why not 10, 10.
Image
PiotrG.
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 5:27 am

Post by PiotrG. »

Yeah, definitely 10.

Considering any kind of synaesthetic associations, it gave me the best visual experiences to date I think. Typical warmish sound but in a new context regarding main theme and sonic concepts inherited from TCH era. Definitely less emotional than absolutely great TCH, really cold in places. Content as always a bit obscure but it gradually became more familiar to me, enough to find something of my own out there, and remains my favourite.
User avatar
lewwatt
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 2:40 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by lewwatt »

When I first listened to this album it felt like the black sheep of BoC's discography (along with Trans-Canada Highway to a lesser extent). The soundtrack-like, modernised sound along with an 8 year gap made the album feel alien - like Boards of Canada in an alternative universe. After three or four listens I dropped it for a while, feeling a little underwhelmed.

Seeing people's thoughts and analyses of the album online showed me that a lot of people felt the same way, but also that a lot of people really appreciated the new sound and got it in a way I didn't seem to have connected with. I revisited the album, paying more attention to it and became accustomed to the different format and style. The atmosphere and strangely undefined theme stood out more than it had previously.

I now see this is a new paradigm of BoC, or at least an alternative one. After this realisation, both sub-consciously and consciously, I began to really to enjoy the album despite, in my opinion, a lack of stand-out tracks or even tracks that are worth playing individually. The album as a whole evokes very strong images of a cold future, a ghost of humanity, rather than the traditional looking glass to the past which BoC have always created. As an album I think it's fantastic (gave it an 8/10) and deserving to be one of BoC's four studio albums. When it comes to individual tracks I find that Nothing is Real, New Seeds, Come to Dust and Reach for the Dead can stand alone just as Pete does. I guess they have more in common with previous BoC than the rest of the album while I feel the rest belongs together.
User avatar
Headphase
Eagle Minded
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:26 pm

Post by Headphase »

TH is definitely my least favourite from BoC, but it's still pretty good.

Campfire Headphase will always be my favourite though. I have listened to that album on repeat hundreds of times and I never get bored of it. Every track is superb.
ShaneAnthony
Eagle Minded
Posts: 362
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:24 am

Post by ShaneAnthony »

All I know is I can't get enough of "come to dust". Wicked tune. The layering of a wave crashing within the snare and the kazoo (at least I think that's what they used, no expert) coming in with the synth melodies takes me away every time I hear it. I absolutely love this tune! This whole album is extremely layered and textured in such a way, that sometimes it freaks me out! I think Mike and Marcus are brilliant musicians! They know how to let tunes evolve and are extremely detailed. That's my thoughts on this album;-)

Much love and respect twoism fam!

Shane Anthony
User avatar
Jonse
Happy Cycler
Posts: 3521
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:19 am
Location: BPR. OG
Contact:

Post by Jonse »

:lol:
Okay...now...wait for fog machine.
User avatar
several
Boqurant
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:53 am

Post by several »

cold earth doesn't get enough love.... :c
Several
Post a reply