warphead wrote:I listen to full albums all the time, I'm from the era before ipod so playing from beginning to end is a natural process for me. I also skip between bits and pieces plenty if I need to, depends what mood I'm in.
Right now. I'm playing LCD Soundsystem This is Happening. Yesterday I played Talking Heads Remain in Light, Tools Lateralus. and a few eps from Autechre.
Though I use mp3 players for years. I've never made a playlist in my life lol. Heh, I'm a bit of a luddite. I presume a playlist is when you randomly put together a mix for certain things? Like a running playlist and a cycling playlist? Yeah whatever, I couldn't care less mate

a bit wanky imo
I'd just like to say one important thought. Many, many times I have had that eureka moment with tracks I thought I definitely did not like when I could not be bothered to press skip, or when the skip button wasn't close to hand (for example when cycling heh). And that is the main reason why I like listening to full albums. There are a lot of tracks that I've just had 'lightbulb' moments with. And those moments are special imo.

Yeah this essentially..
I think playlists should begin at DJing and be left there, and many may many years ago I would have identified as a DJ, now not so much, but I can certainly still throw a few records together. I like to think that an artist that I listen too would prefer her or his music to be heard in the order that it is released in. If I have a favourite track on an album, I relish hearing it play sometimes seamlessly after the track that precedes it, and when it ends I find bliss in hearing the song that proceeds it. I think that most of the artists that I listen to in the electronic/post/psych/shoegaze/synth have all intention of one track following a certain track on an album, and then in turn being followed by another track, it's obvious really as elements of songs are heard in the previous song and there is no gap in between tracks when heard on a CD player or on record. Or if you turn off automatic fades on your media player of choice and rid yourself of synthetic gaps between songs when you rip them off CD if you still in fact do that.
Of course there is always music that was created without an album in mind and for this, I think it's ok (in most cases) to listen how ever you please, take for example Erik Satie or Dmitri Shostakovich, It is here however that I personally would listen as the the artist wrote it if it is possible, for example Shostakovich's 24 prelude-fugue pairs (one in each of all of the major and minor keys of the chromatic scale) in Opus 87 would be listened in order C, Am, G, Em etc. etc. to Dm. In most cases however this isn't possible and so I listen as the performer or recording label has gathered the tracks, as it's usually with some uniformity, take for example Fujiko Hemming performing Chopin standards on La Campanella, or Idil Biret doing the same.
The there is the compilation and the mix, where I listen as the artists that compiled the tracks intended. A great example would be an original Sasha and John Digweed Northern Exposure, Adam Freelands Back To Mine, The Art Of Zen Relaxation released on Creative Vibes, pretty much any DJ Kicks or as someone mentioned Thievery Corporation. All worthy of a mention but in completely different styles of mixing and compilation. A good mixtape is any of the
2-TIMES mixes currently, particularly the
Ptaki and
Paul Murphy ones. These are well thought out, and aren't just slap-sticked together like some gym playlist (gross).
So after a bit of a rant..
1. Pretty much exclusively
1. It was yesterday, the last time I listened to music apart from right now. Bing & Ruth - Tomorrow Was The Golden Age.. Though I'm listening to Loscil - Plume right now.
2. They are pretty chav IMO and have no place in my life. I would't consider a mixtape or a compilation to be a playlist.
Spotify is a crud of our musical world and predominantly only serves to further disintegrate music. All all for the future, but this service is just too unfair to artists.