GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
- luminousdusk
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:25 pm
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
It's an analogy for a flashback. Next album is gonna be a trip.
It's Mushy season
It's Mushy season
Last edited by luminousdusk on Fri Aug 29, 2025 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
The fact that the cosecha site now redirects to the Tomorrow's Harvest video can only mean one thing: That this is hinting at something *other* than Tomorrow's Harvest, yes yes.
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
I posted about the Laravel update on bocpages’ Instagram. (17:43 Paris time)HASHY wrote:The site now redirects to the Tomorrow's Harvest Transmission video? thats either a very good sign, or it just means they aren't gonna do anything new with it so it just redirects to the very video the site originally revealed for the ARG. Either way its interesting and i wonder why they now suddenly made this decision
Little over three hours later (21:10 Paris time) they updated the website.
Maybe it’s related?
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Ambiguous you say.2020k wrote:But, for now, it's still too ambiguous.
Black Box.
Placeholder Square.
QED.
- HappyCyclist
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 10:29 pm
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Is this what the site pointed to at the height of the ARG?
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
https://bocpages.org/wiki/Cosecha-transmisiones.comHappyCyclist wrote:Is this what the site pointed to at the height of the ARG?
On April 29, 2013 all Boards of Canada's sites pointed to cosecha-transmisiones.com with a terminal. Entering the correct code redirected you to this video which contained the album launch date.
- HappyCyclist
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 10:29 pm
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Is this what the site pointed to at the height of the ARG?
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
See answer above or is this a double post on accident?HappyCyclist wrote:Is this what the site pointed to at the height of the ARG?
- northernlite
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:32 pm
- Location: north woods
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
well well well...
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II

Some of you all..
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
This is a big piece of the dam breaking off. Amazing!
- luminousdusk
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:25 pm
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Either this is all going to make sense very shortly.. Or they've just gone completely fucking mental
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
The bros are so cheeky
I bet cosecha-transmisiones now remains like this indefinitely. It's now just an artifact that showcases what the original intent of the website was. Even if it's a redirect rather than an embed.
I bet the new website is now being moved to boardsofcanada.com
As to why cosecha was used to work on it, simple. Test the website, and hype up the nutty fans who'd even know what cosecha is.
... it's really starting to feel quite real now
I bet cosecha-transmisiones now remains like this indefinitely. It's now just an artifact that showcases what the original intent of the website was. Even if it's a redirect rather than an embed.
I bet the new website is now being moved to boardsofcanada.com
As to why cosecha was used to work on it, simple. Test the website, and hype up the nutty fans who'd even know what cosecha is.
... it's really starting to feel quite real now

- Dudeman162
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:31 am
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
it just looks like warp is mukinabaht with the website for whatever reason. Gonna be skeptical until John Boards O. Canada himself tells me there's gonna be a new album
turn this tv off, turn this tv off
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
It's wild to me that people are still skeptical, you'll all be listening to track 6 of the new album saying "yeah I'll believe it when BoC tells me it's real"

- Dudeman162
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:31 am
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
demo wrote:It's wild to me that people are still skeptical, you'll all be listening to track 6 of the new album saying "yeah I'll believe it when BoC tells me it's real"
at this point imma need a taste test of the LP5 vinyl disc
turn this tv off, turn this tv off
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Dudeman162 wrote:it just looks like warp is mukinabaht with the website for whatever reason. Gonna be skeptical until John Boards O. Canada himself tells me there's gonna be a new album
Why would they 'mukinabaht' a website that hasn't been in use for 12 years? Why say Nobody Home followed by Morse code for it to only go through so many offline changes and now be redirected to a video that was part of a promo for TH? Why would they or WARP tinker around with a virtually useless site like that? Are they bored?
They've known that we've seen the changes since several months ago, and they'd have to be sociopaths to mess with the website only to have it mean nothing.
- belchmaster
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:37 pm
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
So the whole Laravel thing was just a hiccup? I bet with flash this would have never happened.
- HappyCyclist
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 10:29 pm
Re: GENERAL NEW RELEASE SPECULATION TOPIC PART II
Thanks for the answer, sorry for the double post. It’s weird because this site should have naturally pointed to this youtube video ever since the ARG ended a decade ago. The place it ended up is unremarkable, but the way we got here is undeniable— there has been activity. If we hadn’t been tracking the site it would be like not much happened at all.Fredd-E wrote:See answer above or is this a double post on accident?HappyCyclist wrote:Is this what the site pointed to at the height of the ARG?