Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album?

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

Post a reply
User avatar
clear blue water
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2025 1:03 pm

Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album?

Post by clear blue water »

Surely these two tracks would have fitted onto MHTTC at the expense of two weaker tracks on that album? I just don't get why they would leave them off official releases?
User avatar
babylulu
Eagle Minded
Posts: 261
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:17 am
Location: philly

Re: Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album

Post by babylulu »

they’re a little simple compared to most of their studio albums, not to say they are bad or ineffective, but not really fitting within the canon of their studio albums.

i feel Sequoia is most deserving of being on MHTRTC
Image
User avatar
Negamuse
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 2122
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:45 am

Re: Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album

Post by Negamuse »

We know that of the unreleased stuff that's leaked some of it was from tapes made for friends. It's possible that any one track that's "good enough" had some special meaning to its intended recipient that releasing it on an album "for everybody" would cheapen it somehow.

You get this with artwork that gets discovered after the death of an artist, or stuff written in letters sent by authors. Why not with musicians too?

But this is just me speculating
User avatar
DFD21
Boqurant
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:19 pm
Location: Wiltshire, UK

Re: Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album

Post by DFD21 »

My theory on it is that they sound much less glossy than the other tracks on MHTRTC, so could not be used in their known form without standing out, even as extra tracks. Perhaps they tried to re-record them but couldn't get the same vibe; it happens.
Frindia
Posts Quantity
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:08 am

Re: Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album

Post by Frindia »

babylulu wrote:
i feel Sequoia is most deserving of being on MHTRTC
feels like a cousin of roygbiv
User avatar
Altruizine
Eagle Minded
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album

Post by Altruizine »

DFD21 wrote:My theory on it is that they sound much less glossy than the other tracks on MHTRTC, so could not be used in their known form without standing out, even as extra tracks. Perhaps they tried to re-record them but couldn't get the same vibe; it happens.
Sounds right to me. MHTRTC has a homogenous mood throughout the record. While the tracks have some analogue grittiness to them there's this almost sterile glossiness at the same time. As opposed to Geogaddi which is darker and muddier.

Didn't they make hundreds of new tracks between MHTRTC and Geogaddi or something? Those tracks might've been just as good as what we received but didn't fully fit in with the overall theme
xeno
New Seed
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2025 5:39 am

Re: Why was Boqurant/5.9.78 not included on any studio album

Post by xeno »

Frindia wrote:
babylulu wrote:
i feel Sequoia is most deserving of being on MHTRTC
feels like a cousin of roygbiv
Agreed. Especially the bassline.
Post a reply